Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged account on adjacent network
-
ExploitSubmit crafted "Utilisateur" parameter
-
ExecutionTrigger SQL injection in query
-
ImpactRead/modify arbitrary database records
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated low-privileged user account on the affected ARKETEAM Protectel module (PROTECTELMAJ before v6.5.19 or BDF before v6.4.67) and, per the CVSS vector, adjacent-network reachability (AV:A) rather than arbitrary internet access. The concrete trigger is unsanitized input supplied through the "Utilisateur" parameter. Limiting factors: it is not remote-unauthenticated (an account is needed), the attacker must reach the application over the adjacent/local network segment, and only these two niche modules in the stated version ranges are affected. Note the input CVSS encodes PR:H while the description says the required account is low-privileged; the privilege bar should be confirmed with the vendor. |
| Impact | This is a CWE-89 SQL injection in the ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF, reachable through the "Utilisateur" parameter. The CNA-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L, base 8.4) describes an adjacent-network, low-complexity attack with high confidentiality and integrity impact. A clear signal conflict exists: the CVSS vector encodes PR:H (high privileges required), yet the description explicitly states the flaw is triggered by input from a "low privileged user" - these disagree, and the description's lower bar is the more exploit-relevant of the two; verify the true privilege requirement with the vendor/CERT-PL advisory. On the decision side, the input carries a vuln.today priority of "this_week" and a vendor patch is available, but there is no EPSS probability, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit or PoC reference supplied. So while the technical impact is high (full read/write of the backing database typical of SQLi), the real-world urgency signals are moderate rather than critical: no evidence of active exploitation and no published exploit code, against a niche vendor product. Net: a genuine high-impact, patch-now-this-week issue for anyone running these modules, but not an emergency mass-exploitation scenario based on the available signals. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a low-privileged account on the Protectel application, positioned on the adjacent network, submits crafted input in the "Utilisateur" parameter that is not properly neutralized before being used in a SQL query. This lets them read or modify arbitrary database contents (credentials, business records) belonging to other users. No public exploit code or PoC was identified in the provided sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026
SQL injection in the ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ (before 6.5.19) and BDF (before 6.4.67) allows an authenticated user with adjacent-network access to inject arbitrary SQL through the "Utilisateur" parameter, potentially reading and modifying database contents and affecting availability. The issue is CWE-89 and has vendor-released fixes; no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis. Exposure is limited by the need for a valid account and adjacent-network reachability, and the supplied privilege metric is inconsistent with the described low-privileged user requirement.
RemediationAI
Upgrade PROTECTELMAJ to v6.5.19 or later and BDF to v6.4.67 or later; these are the fixed versions identified by the vendor and EUVD. No separate workaround is described in the available sources. Because the assessed prerequisites are an authenticated account and adjacent-network reachability, exposure is lower where the modules are not reachable from untrusted adjacent segments and where low-privileged accounts are restricted, but those measures do not correct the SQL injection. Vendor advisory: https://protectel.arketeam.com/; CERT-PL: https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/10/CVE-2025-68391.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-89 SQL injection: input supplied through the "Utilisateur" parameter is not properly neutralized before being incorporated into a SQL query, allowing a user who can reach that parameter to alter query logic. The affected code is in the ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF, identified by CPEs cpe:2.3:a:arketeam:protectelmaj and cpe:2.3:a:arketeam:bdf. Per the independent assessment, exploitation requires an authenticated account and adjacent-network reachability (AV:A); the supplied CVSS 4.0 vector records PR:H while the description and the CVSS 3.1 assessment describe a low-privileged user, so the exact privilege requirement is not fully consistent across sources and should be confirmed with the vendor. The trigger is the "Utilisateur" parameter; how the application constructs or invokes the underlying query beyond that is not described in the available sources.
Know when Protectelmaj gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Description states a low-privileged user triggers it, so PR:L not PR:H; AV:A and AC:L kept per CNA; SQLi yields C:H/I:H with limited availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (CERT-PL).
CVSS VectorVendor: CERT-PL
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to SQL injection vulnerability. Improper neutralization of input provided by a low privileged user into "Utilisateur" parameter allows for SQL Injection attacks. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67
Executive ViewAI
ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF contain a high-severity SQL injection vulnerability that requires an authenticated user with adjacent-network access. This could allow unauthorized database reads, modifications, and availability disruptions, impacting data integrity and operational continuity.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
More in Protectelmaj
View allSQL injection in ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF allows an authenticated user to submit crafted input th
Unauthenticated file upload in ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ (before 6.5.19) and BDF (before 6.4.67) lets any
Stored cross-site scripting in the note editor of ARKETEAM Protectel PROTECTELMAJ (before 6.5.19) and BDF (before 6.4.67
Improper authorization in the ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ (before v6.5.19) and BDF (before v6.4.67) lets a l
EUVD-2025-211225
GHSA-fxxw-wh9q-438c
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB