Skip to main content

Protectel PROTECTELMAJ CVE-2025-68395

| EUVDEUVD-2025-211219 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-30 CERT-PL GHSA-vqgh-jhr9-j5c3
5.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: CERT-PL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged account on note module
  2. Delivery
    Inject HTML/JS payload into a note
  3. Exploit
    Victim opens the note in module
  4. Execution
    Stored script executes in victim browser
  5. Impact
    Hijack victim session / act as victim

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires access to the note-editor module of PROTECTELMAJ or BDF and the ability to create or edit a note, into which the attacker stores arbitrary HTML/JavaScript; the payload only executes when another user subsequently opens/renders that note (UI:P, passive user interaction). Limiting factors: the attack is confined to the note-editor feature; the supplied vector indicates adjacent-network reachability (AV:A) rather than open-internet exposure; and a second user must view the malicious note for impact to occur. The privilege precondition is unresolved - the description states a low-privileged attacker is needed while the CVSS vector states PR:N, so authentication requirements are not confirmed from available data and should be verified with the vendor.

Impact

This is a medium-severity stored XSS (CVSS 4.0 base 5.1, CWE-79) with no amplifying exploitation signals: EPSS is not provided, the CVE is not in CISA KEV, and no public exploit or PoC reference is supplied - so this is best read as a genuine-but-non-urgent issue rather than a high-priority emergency. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month', consistent with a patch-when-you-can posture rather than act_now/emergency. The supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N) shows no impact on the vulnerable system itself but low confidentiality and integrity impact on a subsequent system (the victim's browser/session), which is the normal shape for stored XSS. Two signals conflict and should be verified with the vendor/CERT-PL: the CVSS vector states PR:N (no privileges / unauthenticated), but the description explicitly says 'a low privileged attacker' injects the payload - these cannot both be true, so treat the authentication precondition as unresolved. The vector also states AV:A (adjacent) rather than the AV:N typical for web-delivered stored XSS, implying the module may be reachable only from an adjacent/internal network segment rather than the open internet; confirm the deployment's network exposure. Net: a real but bounded risk, gated by account access and victim interaction, not a wormable or mass-exploitable flaw.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A user with low-privileged access to a Protectel PROTECTELMAJ or BDF instance creates or edits a note in the note-editor module and embeds malicious HTML/JavaScript. When another user - potentially a higher-privileged operator - later opens that note, the stored script executes in their browser session, enabling session/credential theft or actions in the victim's context. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and execution depends on the victim viewing the crafted note (UI:P).

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the note editor of ARKETEAM Protectel PROTECTELMAJ (before 6.5.19) and BDF (before 6.4.67) lets an attacker with note access inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript that runs when another user opens the note. The issue is medium severity (CVSS 4.0 base 5.1, CWE-79), a vendor patch is available, and there are no amplifying exploitation signals: it is not in CISA KEV, EPSS is not provided, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The privilege requirement is ambiguous because the description refers to a low-privileged attacker while the supplied CVSS vector contains PR:N, so authentication requirements are not confirmed from available data.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade PROTECTELMAJ to v6.5.19 and BDF to v6.4.67; these are the fixed versions listed in the CVE data and patch availability is reported as available from the vendor. Use the vendor page at https://protectel.arketeam.com/ and the CERT-PL reference at https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/10/CVE-2025-68391 for advisory details, verifying that the CERT-PL URL's CVE identifier is a typo or related reference because it differs from CVE-2025-68395. No vendor workaround is provided in the available data, so updating is the complete fix described; if an update cannot be applied immediately, confirm compensating controls with the vendor rather than assuming unsupported mitigations.

Affected VersionsENISA

PROTECTELMAJ 0 <6.5.19
BDF 0 <6.4.67

Affected Packages

euvd bdf fix: 6.4.67
euvd protectelmaj fix: 6.5.19

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CVE-2025-68395 is a CWE-79 stored XSS in the web note-editor module shared by ARKETEAM's Protectel PROTECTELMAJ and BDF products. The CPE records identify arket eam:protectelmaj and arket eam:bdf, and EUVD lists affected ranges as PROTECTELMAJ 0 through <6.5.19 and BDF 0 through <6.4.67. The defect is insufficient neutralization of user-supplied note content before it is rendered, so HTML/JavaScript is stored and then executed in the browser of a user who later visits or opens the note. The supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N) describes adjacent-network reachability, passive user interaction, and low scoped confidentiality/integrity impact; the independent assessment records CVSS 3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N and notes the privilege precondition is unresolved: the description says low-privileged attacker while the vector says PR:N, so authentication requirements are not confirmed from available data and should be verified with the vendor. Exploitation requires access to the note-editor module and the ability to create or edit a note; the trigger is described in the sources, and no public exploit or PoC is supplied, with the CVE not in CISA KEV.

Know when Protectelmaj gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (CERT-PL) PRIMARY 5.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Stored XSS needs a low-privileged account to inject (PR:L per description) and a victim to view the note (UI:R); scope changes to the browser (S:C) with low C/I and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (CERT-PL).

CVSS VectorVendor: CERT-PL

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
Low
Subsequent system: Integrity
Low
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Oct 30, 2026 - 12:01 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF contain a note editor module vulnerable to Stored XSS. A low privileged attacker can inject arbitrary HTML and JS into notes, which will be rendered/executed when a user visits this module. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche vendor (ARKETEAM) compliance product, limited and regional enterprise footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy