Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach Hive network endpoint
-
DeliveryAccess overly permissive inter-service interface
-
ExploitIntercept internal communications
-
ExecutionPivot laterally to adjacent containers
-
ImpactEscape container isolation to host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Default permission hardening
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network connectivity to a default HCL Hive 1.0 deployment - no authentication, no elevated privileges, and no non-default configuration are required, as the vulnerability IS the default configuration. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N confirms this: the flaw is present in a standard out-of-the-box installation and is reachable over the network with low complexity. The primary limiting factor is network exposure: organizations that isolate HCL Hive behind strict ingress firewalls or zero-trust network policies significantly reduce the attack surface, as the attacker must first reach the platform's internal or management network interfaces. Container breakout impact is further limited to host systems or co-located containers - scope beyond the immediate Hive deployment depends on the surrounding infrastructure. |
| Impact | The vendor-assigned CVSS score of 7.5 (High) is driven by AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with a confidentiality-only impact (C:H/I:N/A:N). However, the described impact set - lateral movement, container breakout, and communications interception - is operationally more severe than C:H/I:N/A:N implies; container breakout inherently involves scope change to the host or adjacent containers, which the vendor's S:U metric does not reflect. No EPSS score was provided in the intelligence data, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. The vulnerability has not been added to the CISA KEV catalog, and no public proof-of-concept exploit is known at time of analysis - both moderately positive signals. That said, CWE-276 flaws in containerized platforms are generally straightforward to exploit once an attacker has network connectivity, as they require no memory-corruption primitives or timing precision. The primary real-world risk limiter is HCL Hive's relatively narrow deployment footprint as a version 1.0 product. Organizations running Hive 1.0 in network segments accessible to untrusted users or tenants should treat this as a priority patch. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker with network access to a HCL Hive 1.0 deployment connects to an inter-service endpoint or management interface protected only by the platform's default (overly permissive) access controls, then leverages those permissions to enumerate or intercept internal service communications - extracting credentials, tokens, or sensitive data transiting the platform. From there, the attacker pivots laterally to adjacent containers or services using the same default permissions, potentially achieving container breakout to the underlying host. No public proof-of-concept code is known, but CWE-276 vulnerabilities in containerized platforms generally require no exploit primitives - only knowledge of the exposed endpoint and understanding of the default permission model. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 24, 2026
Incorrect default permissions in HCL Hive 1.0 expose containerized deployments to unauthorized lateral movement, container breakout, and interception of sensitive inter-service communications by network-accessible attackers requiring no authentication. The flaw (CWE-276) means the platform ships with overly permissive defaults - not a misconfiguration by the operator - making any default deployment potentially vulnerable without additional hardening. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, and the vulnerability has not been added to the CISA KEV catalog, but the combination of a network-accessible vector, no authentication requirement, and high confidentiality impact warrants prompt remediation.
RemediationAI
Consult the HCL Support knowledge base article KB0131731 (https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0131731) for the primary remediation guidance; an exact patched release version is not specified in the available intelligence data, so the patch version should be confirmed directly with HCL before deployment. As compensating controls while a patch is applied: restrict network access to HCL Hive management and inter-service endpoints using firewall rules or network policies that enforce least-privilege communication paths between containers - this limits an attacker's ability to reach overly permissive endpoints. Audit and harden container runtime security contexts (drop unnecessary Linux capabilities, enforce read-only root filesystems, disable privilege escalation) to reduce the blast radius of any container breakout. Additionally, enable mTLS or equivalent encryption on internal service-to-service communications to mitigate the interception risk independently of the permission flaw. These controls reduce exposure but do not eliminate the root-cause permission defect; patching remains the definitive fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-276 (Incorrect Default Permissions) indicates that HCL Hive 1.0 (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:hclsoftware:hcl_hive:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) ships with file system permissions, network policies, or inter-container access controls set more permissively than the principle of least privilege requires. In containerized or microservices platforms, this class of vulnerability typically manifests as containers running with excessive Linux capabilities, overly broad service account bindings, unrestricted inter-pod network policies, or world-readable mount points on shared volumes - any of which can be chained to escape container isolation, pivot to adjacent services, or passively intercept internal API traffic and credentials transiting the service mesh. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N confirms the permissive defaults are reachable from the network without authentication, consistent with exposed management interfaces or inter-service endpoints lacking access controls.
Know when Hcl Hive gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Scope changed to C because container breakout crosses the container isolation boundary; I:L added since lateral movement implies write or execution capability in adjacent systems.
Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).
CVSS VectorVendor: HCL
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL Hive is affected by incorrect default permissions which could allow an attacker unauthorized lateral movement, container breakout, and interception of sensitive internal communications.
Executive ViewAI
HCL Hive 1.0 ships with overly permissive default permissions that expose containerized deployments to network-based lateral movement, container breakout, and inter-service communication interception without requiring authentication. Any organization running Hive with default settings faces immediate infrastructure compromise risk; the lack of available patches makes urgent hardening essential.
Restrict network access to Hive infrastructure via firewall and segmentation policies; enforce application-layer authentication and authorization above platform defaults; implement container network policies to limit lateral movement; deploy monitoring for unusual inter-container communications and privilege escalation attempts; disable non-essential Hive services and ports.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Unauthorized system access in HCL Hive results from the product bundling third-party components that contain publicly do
HCL Hive employs a risky cryptographic primitive (CWE-1240) that creates systemic trust failure across the platform: if
Broken access control in HCL Hive 1.0 allows a high-privileged network attacker to bypass code verification gates and in
HCL Hive 1.0 exposes its authentication endpoint without rate limiting, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to con
Insufficient access control granularity in HCL Hive's Keycloak IAM instance exposes protected resources to unauthenticat
HCL Hive exposes its Swagger API documentation publicly to unauthenticated users, revealing API endpoint structures, HTT
EUVD-2025-210763
GHSA-xpcx-m92f-xj7q
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB