Skip to main content

FortiOS FortiProxy EUVDEUVD-2025-210465

| CVE-2025-62675 MEDIUM
HTTP Response Splitting (CWE-113)
2026-07-14 fortinet GHSA-cm5j-986p-jqrj
4.3
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid web filter override token
  2. Delivery
    Craft URL embedding CRLF sequences in override parameter
  3. Exploit
    Deliver malicious link to target user via phishing
  4. Execution
    User clicks link triggering FortiOS/FortiProxy processing
  5. Persist
    Unsanitized CRLF sequences injected into HTTP response headers
  6. Impact
    Arbitrary headers written to victim browser or downstream cache

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization HTTP response header sanitization
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two specific preconditions: first, the attacker must be in possession of a valid web filter override token issued by the FortiOS or FortiProxy instance - this token is tied to the web filter override feature, which must be enabled and in active use in the target deployment; second, user interaction is required, specifically the victim must click a crafted link delivered by the attacker. Exploitation is therefore limited to environments where the web filter override feature is configured and tokens have been provisioned. The CVSS AC:H rating reflects that obtaining a valid token is a non-trivial precondition beyond normal network access. Factors limiting exploitation include: the need for a legitimate or stolen override token (non-default privileged artifact), mandatory victim interaction (UI:R), and no direct confidentiality or availability impact even upon successful header injection.

Impact

The overall risk is low. The CVSS base score of 3.4 reflects the genuine constraints: AC:H captures the requirement for an attacker-held web filter override token (an out-of-band precondition), UI:R requires victim interaction, and the impact is limited to low integrity (I:L) with no confidentiality or availability impact. The S:C flag elevates the score slightly due to potential cross-component impact. No KEV listing confirms no mass exploitation. The temporal qualifiers E:P/RL:O/RC:C indicate an official Fortinet remediation exists and the vendor has confirmed the finding, but only partial exploit evidence is available - no weaponized exploit. EPSS data was not provided; absent that signal, the limited impact surface and high-complexity preconditions suggest this is a low-priority item for most environments. CVSS indicates network vector (AV:N) but meaningful exploitation also requires social engineering to achieve UI:R, making mass automated exploitation (automatable=No) unlikely.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained a valid FortiOS web filter override token - whether through credential theft, insider access, or social engineering - crafts a URL that embeds CRLF sequences in a parameter processed by the web filter override endpoint. The attacker then delivers this URL to a target user via phishing or a malicious webpage. When the user clicks the link, the FortiOS/FortiProxy system incorporates the unsanitized input into an HTTP response header, injecting attacker-controlled headers that could poison the user's browser cache or facilitate a follow-on cross-site scripting attack.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026

HTTP Response Splitting in Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy enables an attacker who holds a valid web filter override token to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into server responses by tricking a user into clicking a crafted link. Affected versions span FortiOS 7.2 through 7.6.4 and FortiProxy 7.2 through 7.6.4. No active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV, though the CVSS temporal vector includes E:P, indicating partial proof-of-concept evidence exists. Real-world impact is constrained by the requirement to possess a valid web filter override token and to achieve user interaction.

RemediationAI

Consult the Fortinet FortiGuard advisory FG-IR-26-152 at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-152 for exact patched build versions; the CVSS temporal marker RL:O confirms an official fix has been released, but specific fix version numbers are not available in the provided input data and should not be assumed. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, administrators should audit and revoke web filter override tokens for users who do not strictly require them, reducing the pool of tokens an attacker could obtain or abuse. Additionally, user awareness training to avoid clicking unsolicited links from untrusted parties mitigates the UI:R requirement. Disabling the web filter override feature entirely eliminates the attack surface if the feature is not operationally required, though this will prevent legitimate override workflows. Restricting access to the FortiOS/FortiProxy management and web filtering interfaces to trusted networks also reduces exposure.

Affected VersionsENISA

FortiOS 7.2.0 ≤7.2.13
FortiPAM 1.7.0
FortiPAM 1.0.0 ≤1.0.3
FortiPAM 1.5.0 ≤1.5.1
FortiProxy 7.6.0 ≤7.6.4
FortiOS 7.6.0 ≤7.6.4
FortiPAM 1.2.0
FortiProxy 7.0.0 ≤7.0.23
FortiOS 7.0.0 ≤7.0.19
FortiPAM 1.3.0 ≤1.3.1
FortiPAM 1.1.0 ≤1.1.2
FortiOS 7.4.0 ≤7.4.12
FortiPAM 1.6.0 ≤1.6.2
FortiOS 6.4.0 ≤6.4.16
FortiProxy 7.4.0 ≤7.4.14
FortiProxy 7.2.0 ≤7.2.16
FortiPAM 1.4.0 ≤1.4.3

Affected Packages

euvd fortios no fix
euvd fortipam no fix
euvd fortiproxy no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

HTTP Response Splitting (CWE-113) arises when user-controlled data containing CRLF sequences (\r\n) is incorporated into HTTP response headers without sanitization, allowing an attacker to terminate one response header and inject additional headers or even a fabricated response body. In this case, the vulnerable attack surface is the web filter override mechanism within FortiOS and FortiProxy - a feature that allows authorized users to bypass category-based web filtering using a token. CPE data confirms affected products are cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortios, cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy, and cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortipam. The S:C (Changed Scope) in the CVSS vector reflects that the injected headers may affect a component beyond the FortiOS/FortiProxy instance itself, such as the victim's browser cache or downstream proxy, which is characteristic of response splitting primitives enabling cache poisoning or cross-site scripting.

Know when Fortios gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (fortinet) PRIMARY LOW
NVD 4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.1 MEDIUM

Token possession is a privilege prerequisite mapping to PR:L; once held, crafting the injection link is straightforward (AC:L), with S:C reflecting downstream browser or cache impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Jul 14, 2026 - 18:52 NVD
LOW MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Jul 14, 2026 - 18:52 NVD
3.4 (LOW) 4.3 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Jul 14, 2026 - 15:15 cve.org
LOW 3.4

DescriptionNVD

An Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions may allow an attacker in possession of a valid web filter override token to inject arbitrary headers via tricking a user into clicking on a crafted link.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise firewall, VPN, and web proxy platform
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

CVE-2022-40684 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 18

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an

CVE-2024-55591 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote

CVE-2024-21762 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 09

A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0

CVE-2023-27997 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 13

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi

CVE-2020-12812 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 24

FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication

CVE-2016-1909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 15

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0

CVE-2016-6909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 24

Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9

CVE-2025-25249 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 13

Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiOS (6.4 through 7.6.3) and FortiSwitchManager (7.0.x/7.2.x) lets an attacker run

CVE-2025-61624 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Apr 14

Path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM, and FortiSwitchManager allows authenticated admi

CVE-2015-1880 MEDIUM POC
4.3 May 12

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sslvpn login page in Fortinet FortiOS 5.2.x before 5.2.3 allows remote a

CVE-2025-24472 HIGH
8.1 Feb 11

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers with knowledge of upstream/do

CVE-2025-68686 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Feb 10

An Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability [CWE-200] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy