Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain valid low-privileged credentials
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to Integration Server
-
ExploitSubmit crafted request with internal target URL
-
ExecutionServer issues unauthorized outbound request
-
PersistReceive/infer response to enumerate internal services
-
ImpactPivot to discovered internal targets
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to hold a valid, low-privileged authenticated session on IBM webMethods Integration Server (PR:L per CVSS vector) - unauthenticated access is insufficient. The server must be reachable over a network (AV:N), and no user interaction is required beyond the attacker's own actions (UI:N). The SSVC 'not automatable' designation indicates that successful exploitation is not trivially scriptable at scale and likely requires attacker knowledge of internal network topology to yield meaningful intelligence. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the requirement for valid credentials before any SSRF trigger is possible, (2) the inability to escape the server's security scope (S:U), and (3) the practical need to know or guess internal hostnames/IPs for the SSRF to yield actionable results. Organizations with strong egress filtering from the Integration Server host face significantly reduced real-world exposure even if credentials are compromised. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 5.4 (Medium) correctly reflects a constrained impact profile: Confidentiality:Low and Integrity:Low with no Availability impact, and Scope:Unchanged, meaning the vulnerability does not escape the integration server's security boundary. The PR:L requirement means unauthenticated exploitation is not possible - an attacker must first possess valid credentials. EPSS at 0.02% (7th percentile) is exceptionally low, indicating the broader security community has not observed meaningful exploitation attempts. SSVC signals corroborate this: Exploitation 'none', Automatable 'no', and Technical Impact 'partial'. The 'not automatable' designation suggests crafting a successful SSRF request likely requires contextual knowledge of the target environment (internal hostnames, services). Taken together, these signals point to a real but limited risk: this is a meaningful vulnerability for organizations with sensitive internal services reachable from the Integration Server host, but it is not an emergency for environments with strong network segmentation. The primary realistic threat is insider misuse or exploitation following credential compromise. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained low-privileged credentials to IBM webMethods Integration Server - for example, a developer account or a compromised service account - submits a crafted request containing an attacker-controlled internal URL (e.g., http://10.0.0.1:8080/admin) to a vulnerable endpoint. The Integration Server fetches the target resource on the attacker's behalf, and the response is returned or inferred, enabling the attacker to confirm the existence of internal services, read metadata endpoints, or prepare a more targeted follow-on attack against a discovered internal system. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, so exploitation currently requires manual crafting based on knowledge of the application's SSRF-vulnerable parameter. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in IBM webMethods Integration Server (on-premises) 10.15 through IS_11.1_Core_Fix10 allows authenticated remote attackers to coerce the server into issuing unauthorized outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations. An attacker with low-privileged credentials can leverage this to map internal network topology, probe non-publicly-routable services, or use the Integration Server as a pivot point for follow-on attacks against adjacent systems. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS at 0.02% (7th percentile) alongside SSVC exploitation status of 'none' indicate no observed active exploitation.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the fix documented at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7273550. IBM has published the corrective update and organizations should consult that advisory for the specific fix level applicable to their deployment (IS_10.15 or IS_11.1 branch). No exact patched fix-pack version number was independently extractable from the available reference data; verify the target fix level directly with the IBM advisory. As a compensating control pending patching, restrict network egress from the Integration Server host using host-based or perimeter firewall rules to allow only explicitly required outbound destinations, which reduces the attacker's ability to reach internal services even if SSRF is triggered. Additionally, enforce the principle of least privilege on Integration Server accounts - reducing the number of users with authenticated access limits the potential attacker pool. Note that egress filtering may affect legitimate integration workflows and should be tuned carefully against existing adapter and endpoint configurations.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM webMethods Integration Server is an on-premises enterprise integration platform used for API management, B2B integration, and workflow orchestration. CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) occurs when user-supplied input is used to construct outbound HTTP or network requests without adequate validation of the destination, allowing the server to act as an unwitting proxy. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:webmethods_integration_(on_prem)_-integration_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covering the version band from 10.15 with patch level IS_10.15_Core_Fix2611.1 through IS_11.1_Core_Fix10. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U confirms the attack is fully remote, requires no user interaction, and demands only low-level authenticated access - consistent with a logged-in integration user or service account exploiting an insufficiently sanitized URL parameter or endpoint within the server's management or integration layer.
Know when Webmethods Integration On Prem Integration Server gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM webMethods Integration (on prem) -Integration Server 10.15 through IS_10.15_Core_Fix2611.1 to IS_11.1_Core_Fix10 IBM webMethods Integration is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
EUVD-2025-209934
GHSA-7v43-w3v8-wwv7
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB