EUVD-2025-209661
GHSA-2rh5-wmhh-6qgc
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessFingerprint DFXAnalytics instance
-
DeliveryIdentify outdated bundled component
-
ExploitMatch public exploit for that dependency
-
ExecutionDeliver exploit over network
-
ImpactCompromise application
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires that a specific unpatched library or sub-component bundled in DFXAnalytics 3.1 or earlier has a publicly known, exploitable vulnerability, and that the attacker possesses (or can obtain) a working exploit for that component reachable in this deployment's configuration. The vendor CVSS marks it network-exploitable with no authentication or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N), but the description is generic and names no feature, so realistic exploitability hinges on the identity of the outdated component and whether its known flaw is actually reachable and unauthenticated in a given DFXAnalytics install. Limiting factors: the product's small deployment footprint, no known exploit for this CVE, and SSVC assessing technical impact as only partial. |
| Impact | Signals conflict sharply. The vendor-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.8 Critical) implies trivial remote unauthenticated full compromise, but this is a CWE-1395 'Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities' finding - an inherently indirect, catch-all class where actual exploitability depends entirely on WHICH unpatched sub-component is present and whether a working exploit exists for it. CISA SSVC contradicts the 9.8: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, and Technical Impact=partial (not total), which is inconsistent with the C:H/I:H/A:H the vendor asserts. EPSS is 0.03% (9th percentile) - near the floor - and there is no KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: despite the Critical numeric score, real-world priority is LOW-to-MEDIUM at most. The 9.8 is a worst-case placeholder for an unspecified dependency flaw rather than evidence of a discrete, weaponizable bug; the true severity cannot be confirmed without HCL naming the vulnerable component and version. Combined with the product's niche footprint, this does not warrant emergency patching but should be remediated on a normal cycle by upgrading past 3.1. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker fingerprints a DFXAnalytics 3.1-or-earlier instance, identifies an outdated bundled library or sub-component, and reuses a publicly known exploit for that specific dependency to gain unauthorized access or compromise the application. No public exploit for this CVE itself is identified, and the concrete attack path depends entirely on which vulnerable component ships in the deployment. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Sep 30, 2026
HCL DFXAnalytics 3.1 and earlier ship with outdated third-party libraries or sub-components that carry publicly known vulnerabilities, giving remote attackers a potential route to unauthorized access or full compromise of a deployment. The vendor rates this 9.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), but the independent assessment downgrades complexity to AC:H because exploitability depends entirely on which outdated component is present, whether its known flaw is reachable, and whether a working exploit for that component exists and applies to this configuration. No public exploit specific to this CVE has been identified at time of analysis, EPSS is negligible at 0.03% (9th percentile), and CISA SSVC records Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, and Technical Impact: partial - so the headline score overstates near-term practical risk despite the high theoretical ceiling.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
HCL DFXAnalytics contains unpatched third-party libraries with known vulnerabilities that could allow remote attackers with high effort to gain limited unauthorized access. The application fails to update or isolate vulnerable dependencies, potentially enabling exploitation of publicly disclosed security flaws in embedded components to bypass authentication or extract sensitive information.
RemediationAI
Patch status for CVE-2025-59851 is not confirmed by the available data - no fixed version string or commit is supplied - so the first action is to consult the HCL advisory KB0130569 (https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0130569) and apply the release HCL designates for DFXAnalytics 3.1 or later; because the flaw is a dependency issue rather than a single code defect, upgrading the application alone is only sufficient if the new build also refreshes the bundled libraries, so verify the fixed build's component inventory against the affected dependency list. Where a patched build is not yet deployable, take a component-level approach: generate or refresh an SBOM for each DFXAnalytics install to identify the exact outdated libraries and their known CVEs, then remove or disable bundled modules you do not use (export/reporting plugins, sample applications, unused web endpoints, administrative or diagnostic consoles) - this shrinks the reachable attack surface but can silently break integrations, so test in staging first. Restrict network access to the DFXAnalytics listener with firewall rules or a reverse proxy limited to trusted management subnets and known client IPs; the trade-off is that this will block legitimate remote users and machine-to-machine integrations if the allow-list is incomplete. Because SSVC rates the issue as not automatable and technical impact as partial, and EPSS is only 0.03%, emergency out-of-band action is not indicated, but do add the identified vulnerable components to your routine vulnerability-management and patch-cadence tracking, and monitor application and web logs for exploitation attempts against those component endpoints since no dedicated detection signature is provided by the vendor.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-1395, Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component: the weakness is not in HCL's own code but in the bundle of libraries, runtimes, or sub-modules that DFXAnalytics packages and loads at runtime. Because the CVE is written generically - it names no specific library, version, endpoint, or feature - the actual vulnerability surface is whatever an inventory of a given DFXAnalytics 3.1 install reveals, and the practical exploit path is the known CVE of whichever embedded component is reachable. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:hcl:dfxanalytics:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms the affected product but floats the version, consistent with a vendor advisory covering "3.1 and below," and the intelligence tags reference "Authentication Bypass," suggesting the feared outcome of exploiting a bundled component is authentication or authorization circumvention rather than a purely local issue. External attack surface exists in principle (AV:N, PR:N, UI:N per the vendor vector), but the independent assessment applies AC:H, meaning a successful attack requires the attacker to first identify the vulnerable component from the deployed build and match it to an exploit that works unauthenticated in that environment; the tag-level "Authentication Bypass" label should be treated as a description of consequence, not as confirmation that this CVE itself is an authentication bypass.
Know when Hcl gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Kept AV:N/PR:N per vendor but raised to AC:H because exploitation depends on identifying a specific reachable vulnerable component and obtaining a matching exploit; impact retained as worst-case pending component disclosure.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionNVD
HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities flaw where the application utilizes unpatched libraries or sub-components, which could allow an attacker to identify and exploit publicly known security vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access or compromise the application.
Executive ViewAI
HCL DFXAnalytics 3.1 and earlier bundle outdated third-party components that, in the worst case, could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to take full control of a deployment - but whether that outcome is reachable depends entirely on which outdated component a given installation actually contains and whether a working exploit for that component applies. Because no vendor patch exists and no exploit targeting this CVE has been observed, the near-term likelihood of compromise is low, yet any organization running this analytics platform with internet- or broad-network exposure carries a high-ceiling exposure that security leadership should track and contain. Ownership sits with the teams operating DFXAnalytics and the vendor relationship owner who must press HCL for a fixed release.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network access to trusted networks/VPN, deploy WAF or gateway filtering for known third-party library exploit patterns, enforce least privilege and multi-factor authentication on the deployment and its data stores, segment the host from high-value systems, continuously monitor for anomalous authentication and process activity, and complete a software composition analysis to identify and independently patch the specific outdated components in use.
Threat Intelligence Overview
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Information disclosure in HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain sensi
SQL injection and cross-tenant data exposure flaws in HCL BigFix Service Management allow an attacker who can reach the
A Boolean-based SQL injection vulnerability exists in HCL Unica that allows remote attackers to manipulate backend datab
HCL DFXAnalytics 3.1 and earlier transmit sensitive data across the network without transport encryption, allowing anyon
Command injection in HCL BigFix RunBookAI 11.2 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating syst
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 ships with an outdated, vulnerable WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) ser
HCL BigFix Service Management (SX) is affected by a Broken Access Control vulnerability leading to privilege escalation.
SQL injection in HCL Aftermarket DPC version 1.0.0 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to extract sensitive databas
Broken access control in HCL BigFix Service Management lets a low-privileged authenticated user reach administrative scr
Content Security Policy weakness in HCL Hive Telco Observability's Keycloak authentication component allows remote attac
Missing functional level access control in HCL Aftermarket DPC version 1.0.0 enables privilege escalation attacks that c
Authorization bypass in HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management allows a remote, authenticated user to read database reco
Exploit-DB