Skip to main content

Canonical MAAS EUVDEUVD-2025-201010

| CVE-2025-7044 MEDIUM
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2025-12-03 security@ubuntu.com
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as unprivileged MAAS user
  2. Delivery
    Open user.update websocket request
  3. Exploit
    Inject is_superuser=true property
  4. Execution
    Server fails input validation
  5. Impact
    Account elevated to administrator, full deployment control

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid but unprivileged authenticated MAAS user account and access to the MAAS websocket/user-management interface; the attacker sends a user.update websocket request with the is_superuser property set to true, which the server fails to validate against the caller's authorization. The key limiting factor is the need for pre-existing authenticated (PR:L) access - this is not exploitable by a fully unauthenticated remote attacker. No victim user interaction and no non-default configuration are required; any default deployment exposing the websocket API to a logged-in standard user is affected within the listed version ranges.

Impact

This is a privilege-escalation flaw (CWE-269) in Canonical MAAS reachable over the network websocket interface. The input CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) indicates a low-complexity attack by an authenticated, low-privileged user requiring no user interaction, which matches the description exactly. Real-world urgency signals are LOW: EPSS is 0.04% (13th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit was identified in the provided data. However, the technical impact is severe - successful exploitation yields full administrative control of the MAAS deployment, which manages bare-metal provisioning. CONFLICT TO NOTE: the supplied CVSS vector scores impact as C:H/I:N/A:N (6.5), but 'self-promote to administrator' with 'full administrative control' logically implies high integrity and availability impact as well, so the published 6.5 likely understates true impact - verify scoring with the vendor (Launchpad bug 2115714). On balance this is a meaningful but not emergency priority: the saving grace is that it requires a pre-existing authenticated account, so it is primarily an insider/post-compromise escalation rather than a mass-exploitable remote hole.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds a low-privileged MAAS user account (e.g. a developer or a compromised standard account) opens the web UI websocket session and crafts or intercepts a user.update message, adding is_superuser:true. Because the server fails to validate that the requester is authorized to set that property, the account is instantly elevated to administrator, giving the attacker control over every managed machine. No public proof-of-concept was identified in the provided data, and no user interaction from a victim is required.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 18, 2026

Privilege escalation in Canonical MAAS allows an authenticated low-privileged user to self-promote to administrator by manipulating a user.update websocket request so that the is_superuser property is set to true. The server fails to validate that the caller is authorized to change that privilege flag, giving the attacker full administrative control over the MAAS deployment. Canonical MAAS 3.3.x, 3.4.x, 3.5.x, and 3.6.x within the affected version ranges are impacted; vendor patches are available, EPSS is low at 0.04%, and no public exploit was identified at time of analysis.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Mar 15, 2026 - 16:14 CVSS 7.7

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Canonical MAAS 3.3.11, 3.4.9, 3.5.9, or 3.6.2 (or later in the corresponding release series) as applicable; the vendor bug and patch details are at https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/2115714. Because exploitation requires a valid but low-privileged authenticated account, interim compensating controls include auditing MAAS users and removing unnecessary standard accounts, restricting network access to the MAAS websocket/API to trusted administrators and management networks, and monitoring for unexpected user.update requests or superuser role changes. Restricting API access can break normal UI and CLI workflows for legitimate users, and removing accounts can disrupt operations, so these controls should be scoped to the exposure window until patching is complete.

Affected VersionsENISA

maas 3.4.0 <3.4.9
maas 3.3.0 <3.3.11
maas 3.5.0 <3.5.9
maas 3.6.0 <3.6.2

Affected Packages

euvd maas fix: 3.3.11, 3.4.9, 3.5.9, 3.6.2

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Canonical MAAS (Metal as a Service) exposes a websocket API used by its UI and clients for management operations, including user administration. The flaw is an authorization and input-validation failure in the user websocket handler: a user.update request can carry a client-controlled is_superuser property, and the server does not verify that the authenticated caller has permission to grant superuser status. This maps to CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), where privilege state is accepted from user input rather than derived from the authenticated session and its role. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:canonical:maas:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers the affected product family, and EUVD lists Canonical MAAS 3.3.0 before 3.3.11, 3.4.0 before 3.4.9, 3.5.0 before 3.5.9, and 3.6.0 before 3.6.2 as affected. The independent assessment rates the flaw as network-reachable with low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact once administrative control is obtained.

Know when Maas gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Authenticated low-priv user (PR:L) sends a network websocket request (AV:N) with no interaction; self-promotion to admin grants full control, so C/I/A all High (contrary to the input's I:N/A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

5
Severity Changed
Oct 18, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
HIGH MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Oct 18, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
7.7 (HIGH) 6.5 (MEDIUM)
Analysis Updated
Apr 16, 2026 - 06:24 EUVD-patch-fix
executive summary
Patch available
Apr 16, 2026 - 05:29 EUVD
3.4.9,3.3.11,3.5.9
CVE Published
Dec 03, 2025 - 16:16 nvd
HIGH 7.7

DescriptionNVD

An Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists in the user websocket handler of MAAS. An authenticated, unprivileged attacker can intercept a user.update websocket request and inject the is_superuser property set to true. The server improperly validates this input, allowing the attacker to self-promote to an administrator role. This results in full administrative control over the MAAS deployment.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2025-7044 affects MAAS (Metal as a Service) and allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to administrator through improper websocket input validation, granting complete control over infrastructure provisioning and management. Organizations running MAAS in production face immediate risk of unauthorized administrative access and potential compromise of bare-metal deployment pipelines.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. Interim mitigations if patching is delayed: restrict websocket access to trusted networks via firewall rules; disable non-essential user accounts; implement network segmentation to limit MAAS administrative access; monitor websocket logs for suspicious user.update requests containing is_superuser property modifications.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 87% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche Canonical bare-metal provisioning tool, limited to data-center/infra operators
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy