Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as unprivileged MAAS user
-
DeliveryOpen user.update websocket request
-
ExploitInject is_superuser=true property
-
ExecutionServer fails input validation
-
ImpactAccount elevated to administrator, full deployment control
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a valid but unprivileged authenticated MAAS user account and access to the MAAS websocket/user-management interface; the attacker sends a user.update websocket request with the is_superuser property set to true, which the server fails to validate against the caller's authorization. The key limiting factor is the need for pre-existing authenticated (PR:L) access - this is not exploitable by a fully unauthenticated remote attacker. No victim user interaction and no non-default configuration are required; any default deployment exposing the websocket API to a logged-in standard user is affected within the listed version ranges. |
| Impact | This is a privilege-escalation flaw (CWE-269) in Canonical MAAS reachable over the network websocket interface. The input CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) indicates a low-complexity attack by an authenticated, low-privileged user requiring no user interaction, which matches the description exactly. Real-world urgency signals are LOW: EPSS is 0.04% (13th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit was identified in the provided data. However, the technical impact is severe - successful exploitation yields full administrative control of the MAAS deployment, which manages bare-metal provisioning. CONFLICT TO NOTE: the supplied CVSS vector scores impact as C:H/I:N/A:N (6.5), but 'self-promote to administrator' with 'full administrative control' logically implies high integrity and availability impact as well, so the published 6.5 likely understates true impact - verify scoring with the vendor (Launchpad bug 2115714). On balance this is a meaningful but not emergency priority: the saving grace is that it requires a pre-existing authenticated account, so it is primarily an insider/post-compromise escalation rather than a mass-exploitable remote hole. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds a low-privileged MAAS user account (e.g. a developer or a compromised standard account) opens the web UI websocket session and crafts or intercepts a user.update message, adding is_superuser:true. Because the server fails to validate that the requester is authorized to set that property, the account is instantly elevated to administrator, giving the attacker control over every managed machine. No public proof-of-concept was identified in the provided data, and no user interaction from a victim is required. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Oct 18, 2026
Privilege escalation in Canonical MAAS allows an authenticated low-privileged user to self-promote to administrator by manipulating a user.update websocket request so that the is_superuser property is set to true. The server fails to validate that the caller is authorized to change that privilege flag, giving the attacker full administrative control over the MAAS deployment. Canonical MAAS 3.3.x, 3.4.x, 3.5.x, and 3.6.x within the affected version ranges are impacted; vendor patches are available, EPSS is low at 0.04%, and no public exploit was identified at time of analysis.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Canonical MAAS 3.3.11, 3.4.9, 3.5.9, or 3.6.2 (or later in the corresponding release series) as applicable; the vendor bug and patch details are at https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/2115714. Because exploitation requires a valid but low-privileged authenticated account, interim compensating controls include auditing MAAS users and removing unnecessary standard accounts, restricting network access to the MAAS websocket/API to trusted administrators and management networks, and monitoring for unexpected user.update requests or superuser role changes. Restricting API access can break normal UI and CLI workflows for legitimate users, and removing accounts can disrupt operations, so these controls should be scoped to the exposure window until patching is complete.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Canonical MAAS (Metal as a Service) exposes a websocket API used by its UI and clients for management operations, including user administration. The flaw is an authorization and input-validation failure in the user websocket handler: a user.update request can carry a client-controlled is_superuser property, and the server does not verify that the authenticated caller has permission to grant superuser status. This maps to CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), where privilege state is accepted from user input rather than derived from the authenticated session and its role. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:canonical:maas:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers the affected product family, and EUVD lists Canonical MAAS 3.3.0 before 3.3.11, 3.4.0 before 3.4.9, 3.5.0 before 3.5.9, and 3.6.0 before 3.6.2 as affected. The independent assessment rates the flaw as network-reachable with low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact once administrative control is obtained.
Know when Maas gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Authenticated low-priv user (PR:L) sends a network websocket request (AV:N) with no interaction; self-promotion to admin grants full control, so C/I/A all High (contrary to the input's I:N/A:N).
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
5DescriptionNVD
An Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists in the user websocket handler of MAAS. An authenticated, unprivileged attacker can intercept a user.update websocket request and inject the is_superuser property set to true. The server improperly validates this input, allowing the attacker to self-promote to an administrator role. This results in full administrative control over the MAAS deployment.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2025-7044 affects MAAS (Metal as a Service) and allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to administrator through improper websocket input validation, granting complete control over infrastructure provisioning and management. Organizations running MAAS in production face immediate risk of unauthorized administrative access and potential compromise of bare-metal deployment pipelines.
Apply vendor patch. Interim mitigations if patching is delayed: restrict websocket access to trusted networks via firewall rules; disable non-essential user accounts; implement network segmentation to limit MAAS administrative access; monitor websocket logs for suspicious user.update requests containing is_superuser property modifications.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Untrusted search path vulnerability in maas-import-pxe-files in MAAS before 13.10 allows local users to execute arbitrar
maas-import-pxe-files in MAAS before 13.10 does not verify the integrity of downloaded files, which allows remote attack
Canonical MAAS exposes the region controller's RPC secret in plaintext through the vendor-data metadata endpoint, lettin
EUVD-2025-201010
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB