Skip to main content

PowerProtect Data Domain CVE-2026-90720

| EUVDEUVD-2026-111824 MEDIUM
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value (CWE-354)
2026-10-28 dell GHSA-7pq2-p7c8-9q29
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: dell
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high-privileged local access to Data Domain
  2. Exploit
    Target integrity-check validation routine
  3. Execution
    Bypass protection mechanism (CWE-354)
  4. Impact
    Undermine backup integrity/immutability controls

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integrity verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires both local access to the Dell PowerProtect Data Domain appliance (AV:L) and pre-existing high privileges on it (PR:H) - consistent with a trusted administrator/operator account or insider, not an external or low-privileged user. No user interaction is required (UI:N). The specific product feature, configuration, or code path that triggers the improper integrity-check validation is not described in the available sources. The dominant limiting factors are the high-privilege requirement and lack of network vector, which together sharply reduce realistic attacker reach despite the high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity issue (CVSS 6.7) whose real-world risk is substantially constrained by its access requirements rather than by its impact. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N is internally consistent and the limiting factors are clear: AV:L requires local access and PR:H requires the attacker to already hold high privileges on the Data Domain appliance, so this is not a remotely reachable, unauthenticated flaw. The impact metrics (C:H/I:H/A:H) are high because the outcome is a protection-mechanism bypass (CWE-354, Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value), but the prerequisite privilege level means an attacker must essentially already be a trusted administrator/operator. No EPSS score was supplied, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept or exploit reference is present in the input, so there is no signal of active or imminent exploitation. The vuln.today priority is 'this_month' (not act_now/emergency), which aligns with the high-privilege/local profile: a real issue worth patching on a normal cycle rather than an all-hands emergency. The main caveat is missing data - no EPSS, no independent fix-version confirmation, and the triggering mechanism is not described - so prioritization should rest on the access model rather than on any exploitation evidence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds high-privileged local access to a Dell PowerProtect Data Domain appliance (e.g. a compromised administrative/operator account or insider) abuses the improper integrity-check validation to bypass a protection mechanism, potentially undermining the trust or immutability controls the appliance enforces over backup data. No public exploit code or PoC reference is present in the available data, and the specific trigger is not described in the sources. Exploitation is gated by the need for pre-existing high privileges and local access, not network reachability.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

Improper validation of integrity check values in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain lets a local attacker who already holds high privileges bypass a protection mechanism, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability (CVSS 6.7, CWE-354). Affected builds span Feature Release 7.7.1.0 through 8.8 and the LTS2024 (7.13.1.0-7.13.1.80), LTS2025 (8.3.1.0-8.3.1.40) and LTS2026 (8.6.1.0-8.6.1.20) trains, per Dell advisory DSA-2026-416. The dominant limiting factors are the local access vector and the pre-existing high-privilege requirement, so realistic exposure is essentially confined to trusted administrators or insiders on the appliance rather than remote or low-privileged users; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

The fix path is the Dell security update described in advisory DSA-2026-416 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000515178/dsa-2026-416-security-update-for-dell-powerprotect-data-domain-multiple-vulnerabilities); the provided intelligence does not list a specific fixed build number per release train, so the exact target version for each of Feature Release, LTS2024, LTS2025 and LTS2026 must be taken from that advisory before scheduling the upgrade. Because exploitation requires local access plus high privileges on the appliance (CVSS PR:H/AV:L), the practical compensating control while an upgrade window is arranged is to tighten who holds administrative or operator-level local access to Data Domain systems - restrict local administrative logins to named, necessary personnel and review existing high-privilege accounts (including any shared or vendor accounts) - accepting that this reduces insider and credential-misuse exposure but does not remove the underlying validation defect, and that the vendor update remains the only complete fix. No other workaround is stated in the available sources.

Affected VersionsENISA

PowerProtect Data Domain 0 <8.9.0.0 or later
PowerProtect Data Domain 0 <8.6.1.30 or later
PowerProtect Data Domain 0 <7.13.1.90 or later
PowerProtect Data Domain 0 <8.3.1.50 or later

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is classified CWE-354, Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value: the product accepts or acts on data whose integrity check value is not correctly verified, so a manipulation that should be detected is instead treated as trustworthy. On a backup and deduplication appliance such as Data Domain, integrity check values are what underpin assurance that stored or transferred data has not been altered, which is why successful bypass maps to the 'protection mechanism bypass' impact in the Dell description and to high C/I/A in the assessed vector. The assessed vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, i.e. local access, low attack complexity once the attacker is positioned, high privileges required, no user interaction and no scope change. The exact feature, configuration or code path that triggers the improper validation is not described in the available sources, so the specific integrity-checked artifact involved cannot be confirmed from this intelligence. CPE coverage is a single wildcard entry (cpe:2.3:a:dell:powerprotect_data_domain:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), so version scoping must come from the advisory text rather than the CPE.

Know when Powerprotect Data Domain gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (dell) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Description states local access and a high-privileged attacker, giving AV:L and PR:H; a protection-mechanism bypass plausibly yields full C/I/A impact with no user interaction.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (dell).

CVSS VectorVendor: dell

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Oct 28, 2026 - 09:16 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 100% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise backup/storage appliance, common in data centers but vendor-specific
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2026-53481 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 07

Path traversal leading to full system compromise affects Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (DD OS) versions 7.7.1.0 through

CVE-2026-53483 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 07

Improper authentication in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, plus the LTS2026, LTS2025, and L

CVE-2026-26354 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 22

Stack-based buffer overflow in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain DD OS allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute ar

CVE-2026-103780 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 28

Unauthenticated remote command execution is possible on Dell PowerProtect Data Domain appliances running Feature Release

CVE-2026-86384 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 28

Remote, unauthenticated attackers can obtain exposed credentials from Dell PowerProtect Data Domain appliances running F

CVE-2026-86400 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 28

Improper authentication in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain allows remote unauthenticated attackers to bypass authenticatio

CVE-2026-86385 HIGH
8.8 Oct 28

Privilege escalation in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Feature Release 7.7.1.0 through 8.8 allows an authenticated, low-p

CVE-2025-29987 HIGH
8.8 Apr 03

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain with Data Domain Operating System (DD OS) versions prior to 8.3.0.15 contain an Insufficie

CVE-2026-23776 HIGH
8.8 Apr 17

Improper certificate validation in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain DD OS 7.7.1.0-8.5, 8.3.1.0-8.3.1.20 (LTS2025), and 7.13

CVE-2026-86378 HIGH
8.8 Oct 28

Stack-based buffer overflow in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain allows a low-privileged authenticated remote attacker to po

CVE-2026-86398 HIGH
8.8 Oct 28

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain appliances running Feature Release 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80

CVE-2026-23853 HIGH
8.4 Apr 17

Local attackers can gain full system access to Dell PowerProtect Data Domain storage systems without authentication due

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy