Skip to main content

RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW CVE-2026-89200

| EUVDEUVD-2026-98398 HIGH
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-10-13 siemens GHSA-83r2-p444-6pj7
8.4
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: siemens
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local admin access to CROSSBOW
  2. Delivery
    Open custom file label editor
  3. Exploit
    Inject SQL via Name/Value field
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary SQL on database
  5. Impact
    Read or tamper with backend data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated session with administrative privileges on RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (versions below V6.0) and access to the custom file label functionality, specifically the Name and Value input fields, which fail to validate or sanitize input. Limiting factors are significant: the attacker must already possess administrative credentials (PR:H) and local access (AV:L) per the vendor CVSS vector, no user interaction by a victim is needed (UI:N), and the fix is available in V6.0 and later. Because exploitation presupposes administrative control, the practical exposure is confined to insider threat, credential compromise, or post-authentication privilege abuse rather than external unauthenticated attack.

Impact

Signals point to a moderate, access-gated priority rather than an urgent mass-exploitation threat. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (base 8.4) encodes AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N with full high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the vulnerable system (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H), meaning the attacker must already be local and hold administrative privileges - a substantial precondition that caps real-world risk. There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC referenced in the provided intelligence, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No EPSS score was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from this data. A notable tension: CWE-89 SQL injection flaws are frequently network-reachable (AV:N) through a management web interface, yet Siemens scored this AV:L - verify with the vendor whether the custom-file-label feature is reachable only via a local client/console or whether AV:L reflects a thick-client/local management assumption. The high privilege requirement (PR:H, administrative) is the dominant risk-limiting factor: an attacker who already holds admin on CROSSBOW has significant control, reducing the marginal impact of SQL injection, though it still enables database-level actions beyond the application's intended authorization model.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained administrative credentials to a RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW instance (versions below V6.0) enters crafted SQL payloads into the Name or Value fields when creating or editing custom file labels. Because these inputs are not validated or sanitized, the payload is executed against the underlying database, allowing the attacker to read, modify, or destroy stored data. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the attack requires local access and administrative privileges per the CVSS vector.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 13, 2026

SQL injection in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW versions below V6.0 lets an attacker who already holds administrative credentials inject arbitrary SQL commands through the Name and Value fields of custom file labels, compromising the underlying database. The vendor-assessed vector (CVSS 4.0 8.4, PR:H, AV:L) and our independent assessment converge on a high-severity but access-gated issue: exploitation requires an authenticated administrative session and local access, with no user interaction, and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis. Siemens has released a fix in V6.0, so the practical priority is moderate and centered on insider or compromised-admin scenarios rather than external mass exploitation.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Oct 13, 2026 - 10:11 CVSS 6.7

SQL injection in Siemens RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (all versions before V6.0) lets an attacker who already holds an authenticated administrative session run arbitrary SQL commands against the product's underlying database by supplying crafted input in the Name or Value fields used for custom file labels. Per the CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N), the attack requires local access to the management interface and high privileges, so this is best treated as a moderate-risk, defense-in-depth issue rather than an emergency; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and there is no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV). Successful exploitation gives high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the database, but only to actors who already possess administrative rights on the appliance.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW V6.0 or later, per Siemens advisory SSA-508506 (https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-508506.html). Because exploitation requires administrative privileges and local access, compensating controls can reduce exposure while patching: restrict administrative accounts to trusted personnel and enforce least privilege; disable or tightly limit the custom file label functionality if it is not business-critical (side effect: loss of labeling capability); monitor database and application logs for anomalous SQL-like strings in label fields; and apply network segmentation to limit local access to the management interface. These are stopgaps, not replacements for the V6.0 upgrade.

Affected VersionsENISA

RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW 0 <V6.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-89 (SQL injection) in the custom file label feature of RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW, an industrial network management and security appliance. The Name and Value fields intended for labeling files are passed to the backend database without proper validation or parameterization, so crafted input is interpreted as SQL. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:siemens:ruggedcom_crossbow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates all versions before V6.0 are affected. Because the injection point is reached only through an administrative interface after local authentication, the attack surface is constrained to users who can already manage the device; successful exploitation yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the database component (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) but no assessed scope change (S:U). Siemens advisory SSA-508506 provides the vendor's analysis.

Know when Ruggedcom Crossbow gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (siemens) PRIMARY 8.4 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Follows the vendor's local vector and administrative requirement (AV:L, PR:H); SQL injection against the backend yields full read/write/destroy capability, so C:H/I:H/A:H with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (siemens).

CVSS VectorVendor: siemens

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Oct 13, 2026 - 10:22 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Oct 13, 2026 - 10:22 NVD
6.7 (MEDIUM) 8.4 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Name and Value fields for custom file labels. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW, Siemens' substation network security management platform, contains a SQL injection flaw in all releases below V6.0 that allows a user already holding administrative credentials and local access to execute arbitrary database commands and undermine the integrity of the platform's underlying database. Because exploitation is gated behind privileged, on-host access, the realistic threat is an insider or an attacker who has already compromised an administrative account rather than external mass exploitation, but the product's role in OT/substation environments means a successful attack could degrade the visibility and control that operations teams depend on. Leadership should treat this as a privilege-abuse and insider-risk exposure requiring tracked remediation, not a perimeter emergency.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch (RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW V6.0). Until the upgrade is completed, restrict local and administrative access to the CROSSBOW host to a minimal set of named, monitored accounts, remove or disable unused privileged accounts, and monitor database and application logs for unexpected SQL activity in custom file label Name and Value fields.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 93% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche Siemens critical-infrastructure access-management product for substations
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

CVE-2024-27939 CRITICAL
9.8 May 14

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.5). Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), thi

CVE-2023-37372 CRITICAL
9.8 Aug 08

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.4). Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), thi

CVE-2024-27941 HIGH
8.8 May 14

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.5). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vu

CVE-2024-27940 HIGH
8.8 May 14

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.5). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vu

CVE-2023-27411 HIGH
8.8 Aug 08

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.4). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vu

CVE-2023-27463 HIGH
8.8 Mar 14

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.3). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vu

CVE-2023-27310 HIGH
8.8 Mar 14

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.2). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vu

CVE-2023-27309 HIGH
8.8 Mar 14

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.2). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vu

CVE-2026-89198 HIGH
8.7 Oct 13

SQL injection in the firmware-upload filename handling of Siemens RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (all versions prior to V6.0) lets a

CVE-2026-89197 HIGH
8.7 Oct 13

SQL injection in the Value field of notification conditions handled by the Notification Profile configuration in RUGGEDC

CVE-2026-89196 HIGH
8.7 Oct 13

Authenticated SQL injection in Siemens RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (all versions prior to V6.0) allows a user with the specific p

CVE-2026-89199 HIGH
8.7 Oct 13

Authenticated, low-privilege users of Siemens RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW running any version earlier than V6.0 can bypass access

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy