Skip to main content

AshAuthentication CVE-2026-85500

| EUVDEUVD-2026-81487 CRITICAL
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness (CWE-305)
2026-09-17 EEF
9.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: EEF
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (EEF) PRIMARY
9.1 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Primary rating from Vendor (EEF) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: EEF

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
X

Lifecycle Timeline

3
POC Analysis Generated
Sep 19, 2026 - 15:29 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Sep 17, 2026 - 13:51 vuln.today
CVE Published
Sep 17, 2026 - 13:09 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.1

DescriptionCVE.org

Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows an unconfirmed user to obtain a session, defeating a mandatory email confirmation requirement.

AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.Actions.check_user/2 decides whether the attribute named by require_confirmed_with is set using a bare is_nil(Map.get(user, value)). When that attribute is not selected on the loaded record Map.get/2 returns %Ash.NotLoaded{}, and when a field policy denies it for the current actor it returns %Ash.ForbiddenField{}. Neither is nil, so the rejection branch is skipped and sign-i

require_confirmed_with is enforced in two places, and neither holds in every configuration. sign_in_with_token and register are checked only inside AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.Actions, not on the action itself, so any caller that invokes the action directly skips the check. An API layer such as AshGraphql or AshJsonApi invokes the action directly, so this applies to the default configuration. Where a check does run it compares the confirmation attribute against nil. That attribute holds %Ash.NotLoaded{} or %Ash.ForbiddenField{} when it sets select_by_default?: false, when an API layer narrows the read's select, or when a field policy hides it from the sign-in actor. Neither struct is nil, so those configurations read every user as confirmed.

This issue affects ash_authentication: from 4.3.8 before 4.15.0 and from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.14.

AnalysisAI

Unconfirmed accounts can obtain an authenticated session in the AshAuthentication Elixir library, defeating the mandatory email-confirmation gate configured through the password strategy's require_confirmed_with option. The check in AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.Actions.check_user/2 compares the confirmation attribute against nil with a bare is_nil(Map.get(user, field)), so Ash's %Ash.NotLoaded{} and %Ash.ForbiddenField{} sentinels - returned when the attribute is not selected on the loaded record or is hidden from the current actor by a field policy - are treated as a confirmed value; the check also exists only inside the strategy's Actions module and is not attached to the sign-in/register action itself, so callers that invoke the action directly, including API layers such as AshGraphql and AshJsonApi in the default configuration, skip it entirely. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Remediation Vendor-released patch: upgrade ash_authentication to 4.15.0 (for the 4.x line) or 5.0.0-rc.14 (for the 5.0.0 release-candidate line), as documented in GHSA-fc47-6pgw-wh22. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Recommended ActionAI

Within 24 hours, inventory every application and service that depends on AshAuthentication (explicitly including those exposing sign-in through AshGraphql or AshJsonApi) and confirm which of them have require_confirmed_with configured, since that is the precondition for the bypass; then deploy the vendor-patched AshAuthentication release to the highest-exposure, internet-facing systems first. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

CVE-2025-25202 MEDIUM POC
6.3 Feb 11

Ash Authentication is an authentication framework for Elixir applications. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.3), this vulner

CVE-2026-49757 CRITICAL POC
9.2 Jun 15

Account takeover in team-alembic AshAuthentication (0.1.0 to <4.14.0 and 5.0.0-rc.0 to <5.0.0-rc.10) lets an unauthentic

CVE-2026-91039 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 17

Authentication bypass in the Elixir library ash_authentication lets an attacker who operates one federated identity-prov

CVE-2026-88952 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 17

Account takeover in AshAuthentication (Elixir/Ash) 4.14.0 through 4.14.x and 5.0.0-rc.10 through 5.0.0-rc.13 lets unauth

CVE-2026-86533 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 17

Revoked sessions continue to be treated as fully authenticated on affected AshAuthentication and AshAuthentication Phoen

CVE-2026-82761 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 17

Reusing a leaked single-use magic-link token is possible in the Elixir library ash_authentication because its validity c

CVE-2026-82760 HIGH
8.2 Sep 17

Denial of service in the AshAuthentication API-key sign-in strategy lets an unauthenticated, remote attacker exhaust ser

CVE-2026-65633 HIGH
7.6 Aug 25

JWT token replay in AshAuthentication exposes any application using the stateless bearer-token path to full account take

CVE-2026-80218 HIGH
7.6 Sep 17

Authentication bypass in the AshAuthentication library for Elixir/Ash lets an authenticated attacker who holds a valid s

CVE-2026-82685 HIGH
7.6 Sep 17

An authenticated account-takeover primitive exists in the Elixir library AshAuthentication (ash_authentication) versions

CVE-2026-81632 HIGH
7.2 Sep 17

Password sign-in in AshAuthentication Phoenix (ash_authentication_phoenix 1.7.0 to <2.17.4 and 3.0.0-rc.0 to <3.0.0-rc.1

CVE-2026-78223 MEDIUM
6.9 Sep 17

AshAuthentication's token-revocation action accepts forged JWTs without verifying their signature, letting an unauthenti

Share

CVE-2026-85500 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy