Skip to main content

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway CVE-2026-84830

| EUVDEUVD-2026-70365 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-03 NCSC.ch GHSA-8gfp-fw48-772r
8.6
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: NCSC.ch
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain admin credentials via phishing or reuse
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to SEPPmail web management interface
  3. Exploit
    Submit OS metacharacters into vulnerable admin input field
  4. Execution
    Application passes unsanitized input to system shell
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary OS commands with elevated privileges
  6. Impact
    Full appliance compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation unconditionally requires authenticated administrator-level access to the SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway management interface, confirmed by the CVSS PR:H metric. The interface is network-reachable (AV:N), so exploitation can occur remotely once credentials are in hand. No non-default configuration or special deployment mode is required beyond holding valid admin credentials - the CVSS AC:L and AT:N metrics confirm no additional complexity or precondition applies. Exploitation is strictly limited to actors who already possess administrator credentials; the vulnerability is not exploitable by unauthenticated users or by lower-privileged accounts, which is the primary factor tempering real-world risk despite the high CVSS score.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.6 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) accurately characterizes a high-severity but access-constrained vulnerability. The PR:H requirement is the dominant mitigating signal - exploitation demands prior possession of valid administrator credentials, placing it outside the reach of unauthenticated remote attackers. Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in rybnik should treat patching this as urgent, since email gateway appliances are frequently internet-exposed and admin credentials in such environments can be shared, reused across services, or obtained through phishing. The absence of a CISA KEV listing and no identified public exploit code keep immediate mass-exploitation risk low. Risk is most acute in organisations where the admin panel is directly reachable from the internet without VPN enforcement, where MFA is absent, or where the gateway is managed through automated pipelines with embedded credentials. The subsequent-system metrics (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) in the CVSS 4.0 vector suggest impact is bounded to the gateway appliance itself rather than propagating to downstream systems, consistent with a single-system compromise scenario.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained SEPPmail administrator credentials - through phishing, credential reuse, or internal compromise - logs into the management interface and locates a configuration input field that passes data to a system command. By injecting OS metacharacters into that field, the attacker escapes the application context and executes arbitrary OS commands with elevated privileges, achieving full control over the underlying appliance. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, but CWE-78 exploits in web-management interfaces are well-documented and straightforward for anyone already authenticated as admin.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 1.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 03, 2026

Command injection in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.7 enables authenticated administrators to execute operating system commands at elevated privilege levels beyond the intended administrative scope. Classified CWE-78, the flaw exists within the network-accessible management interface and was reported by NCSC.ch (Swiss National Cybersecurity Centre). No active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis; the vendor-released fix is available in version 15.0.7.

RemediationAI

Upgrade SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway to version 15.0.7 or later, which resolves this command injection per the vendor's external release notes at https://downloads.seppmail.com/extrelnotes/150/ERN15.0.html. If immediate patching is not operationally feasible, restrict the administrative interface to trusted internal IP ranges or enforce access exclusively over VPN, substantially reducing the exploitable network surface even though the vulnerability itself remains present. Enforce multi-factor authentication on all administrator accounts to raise the bar for credential compromise. Audit administrator access logs for unexpected commands or shell activity as a detection measure. Note that network restriction does not fix the underlying injection flaw and should be treated as a temporary compensating control only until the 15.0.7 upgrade is applied.

Affected VersionsENISA

Secure Email Gateway 0 <15.0.7

Affected Packages

euvd secure_email_gateway fix: 15.0.7

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:seppmail_ag:secure_email_gateway) is a commercial appliance for email encryption and secure message delivery, widely deployed in DACH-region enterprise environments. CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command) indicates that input accepted through an administrative UI function is passed unsanitized to a system shell or command-execution routine. Administrators can inject shell metacharacters - such as semicolons, backticks, or pipe operators - into a vulnerable parameter, causing the application to execute arbitrary OS commands at a privilege level higher than the web management context alone would grant. This pattern is a classic command injection root cause: insufficient lexical filtering of control characters in a privileged code path.

Know when Secure Email Gateway gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (NCSC.ch) PRIMARY 8.6 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Network-accessible admin interface requires high-privilege credentials; no scope change as CVSS 4.0 SC/SI/SA:N confirms impact is contained to the gateway appliance.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (NCSC.ch).

CVSS VectorVendor: NCSC.ch

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 03, 2026 - 10:16 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 03, 2026 - 08:45 cve.org
HIGH 8.6

DescriptionCVE.org

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before 15.0.7 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to execute commands with elevated privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.7 contains a command injection flaw that allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary operating system commands at elevated privilege levels. For organizations relying on SEPPmail to protect email infrastructure, this vulnerability creates a critical escalation risk: a compromised administrative account can gain full system control, potentially enabling email service disruption, credential theft, or lateral movement into the broader network.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch to version 15.0.7 immediately. Interim mitigation: restrict administrative access to locked-down networks with additional authentication factors (multi-factor authentication on admin accounts) and monitor administrative account activities for unauthorized command execution patterns.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.1%
Top 37% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
Niche European enterprise email encryption appliance, primarily DACH market
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +43
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2024-9043 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 20

Secure Email Gateway from Cellopoint has Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in authentication process. Rated critical severit

CVE-2024-20401 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 17

A vulnerability in the content scanning and message filtering features of Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unau

CVE-2024-6744 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 15

The SMTP Listener of Secure Email Gateway from Cellopoint does not properly validate user input, leading to a Buffer Ove

CVE-2026-44128 CRITICAL
9.3 May 08

Remote code execution in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions prior to 15.0.2.1 enables unauthenticated attackers to e

CVE-2026-44125 CRITICAL
9.3 May 08

Authorization bypass in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions prior to 15.0.4 enables remote unauthenticated attackers

CVE-2026-44127 HIGH
8.8 May 08

Remote unauthenticated attackers can read arbitrary local files and trigger deletion of targeted files in SEPPmail Secur

CVE-2026-44129 HIGH
8.3 May 08

Remote code execution in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions before 15.0.4 allows unauthenticated attackers to execut

CVE-2026-29144 HIGH
7.8 Apr 02

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows attackers to bypass subject sanitization and forge security t

CVE-2026-29143 HIGH
7.8 Apr 02

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 fails to properly authenticate inner messages within S/MIME-encrypte

CVE-2026-29139 HIGH
7.8 Apr 02

Account takeover in SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions before 15.0.3 allows unauthenticated attackers to reset victi

CVE-2026-29141 HIGH
7.7 Apr 02

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows remote attackers to bypass subject line sanitization controls

CVE-2026-29140 HIGH
7.7 Apr 02

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows remote attackers to inject malicious certificates into S/MIME

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy