Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach network-exposed Guardium interface
-
DeliveryCraft input with shell metacharacters
-
ExploitBypass improper neutralization (CWE-78)
-
ExecutionAchieve arbitrary OS command execution
-
ImpactFull compromise of monitoring appliance
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and requires the vulnerable network service/interface to be reachable by the attacker; no authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N). The AC:H rating means exploitation is NOT a single deterministic request - the attacker must satisfy a specific precondition (e.g. a particular application/input state, timing window, or crafted payload meeting constraints outside their full control) to reach and successfully trigger the unneutralized OS command path. The primary limiting factor is this elevated attack complexity plus the typical network segmentation of a security-monitoring appliance, which reduces exposure; the description does not name the exact endpoint or parameter. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely serious flaw whose signals are internally consistent. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.1) describes an unauthenticated (PR:N), network-reachable OS command injection with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - command injection that yields arbitrary code execution is well-matched to CWE-78. The single dampening signal is AC:H, indicating a non-trivial precondition (e.g. a specific input state, race, or crafted payload that must satisfy conditions the attacker cannot fully control), which is why the score lands at 8.1 rather than the 9.8 typical of AC:L unauthenticated RCE. On the exploitation side there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC identified at time of analysis, so there is currently no evidence of active or automated exploitation. Net: treat as a real, patch-worthy priority because it is an unauthenticated RCE-class bug on a security appliance, but the AC:H barrier plus absence of a public exploit means it is not (yet) a mass-exploitation emergency. No conflicting signals were found - the vendor CVSS, CWE, and description all agree on unauthenticated network command injection. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote attacker with no credentials sends a crafted request to a network-exposed Guardium 12.2 interface, embedding shell metacharacters in a field that is passed unsanitized to an OS command, achieving arbitrary command execution in the appliance context. The AC:H rating implies the attacker must satisfy a specific precondition or win a timing/state window rather than firing a single deterministic request. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026
OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the affected appliance, giving full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 8.1, CWE-78). The assessed vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) means no credentials and no user interaction are needed, but exploitation is not a single deterministic request - the attacker must first satisfy a specific precondition such as a crafted payload meeting input constraints or a particular application/timing state, and the target's vulnerable network service must be reachable, which is uncommon for a security-monitoring appliance that is typically segmented. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis; a vendor patch is available per the referenced IBM support advisory.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory - IBM has published a fix through the support page at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035; because no exact fixed version string is supplied in the available data, consult that advisory for the specific 12.2 fixpack/APAR and apply it to every Guardium collector, aggregator, and central manager in the environment, verifying the fix level after upgrade. Until patching completes, reduce exposure by restricting the appliance's management and collection interfaces to trusted administrative networks with firewall rules or ACLs and by removing any internet-facing exposure - the trade-off is that remote collectors or S-TAP agents connecting from outside those allowed ranges may need temporary exceptions. Additional compensating controls: run Guardium service processes under least-privilege OS accounts so a successful injection yields less than full appliance control, and monitor appliance logs and process-spawn activity for unexpected shell invocations from the Guardium application, accepting that this is detection rather than prevention. Because no public exploit code is currently identified but the flaw is remotely triggerable without authentication, treat the segmentation controls as time-bounded until the vendor patch is in place.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, meaning user-controllable input reaches a system shell or command-execution primitive without adequate escaping, allow-listing, or argument separation. IBM Guardium Data Protection is a database activity monitoring and data-security platform whose management, collection, and aggregation components expose network services used for administration and reporting; the advisory does not name the exact endpoint, parameter, or binary carrying the unneutralized command path, so the injection surface should be treated as any externally reachable service on port-exposed Guardium 12.2 deployments. The CPE record cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, confirming the identifier is scoped by the advisory text (12.2) rather than a single build. AC:H is the key technical qualifier: the attacker's payload must land in the correct state to reach the vulnerable command path, so reliable exploitation likely depends on fingerprinting the deployment and tailoring input rather than firing a generic request. The impact metrics (C:H/I:H/A:H) indicate commands execute with the privileges of the affected Guardium process, which is typically enough to read or alter collected audit data and to pivot within the appliance.
Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Unauthenticated (PR:N) network-reachable OS command injection yields full C/I/A on the appliance; AC:H reflects the non-deterministic precondition implied by the vendor score.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by an OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-84085, CVSS 8.1) that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute operating system commands on the appliance, placing the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the platform at full risk. Guardium underpins database activity monitoring, audit evidence, and regulatory compliance reporting for many organizations, so a successful compromise could disrupt audit coverage, expose monitored data, and force an expensive rebuild and re-validation of the monitoring estate. Leadership should note that no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis and that a vendor patch is available, while recognizing that exploitation requires the attacker to satisfy a precondition and reach the vulnerable service, which the vendor describes as uncommon given typical segmentation of security-monitoring appliances.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Guardium Data Protection
View allSQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma
Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang
Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app
Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers
Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2
Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac
Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen
Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent
Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c
A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u
Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL
EUVD-2026-83438
GHSA-4mgj-9vmr-j9cj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB