Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection CVE-2026-84085

| EUVDEUVD-2026-83438 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-4mgj-9vmr-j9cj
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach network-exposed Guardium interface
  2. Delivery
    Craft input with shell metacharacters
  3. Exploit
    Bypass improper neutralization (CWE-78)
  4. Execution
    Achieve arbitrary OS command execution
  5. Impact
    Full compromise of monitoring appliance

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and requires the vulnerable network service/interface to be reachable by the attacker; no authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N). The AC:H rating means exploitation is NOT a single deterministic request - the attacker must satisfy a specific precondition (e.g. a particular application/input state, timing window, or crafted payload meeting constraints outside their full control) to reach and successfully trigger the unneutralized OS command path. The primary limiting factor is this elevated attack complexity plus the typical network segmentation of a security-monitoring appliance, which reduces exposure; the description does not name the exact endpoint or parameter.

Impact

This is a genuinely serious flaw whose signals are internally consistent. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.1) describes an unauthenticated (PR:N), network-reachable OS command injection with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - command injection that yields arbitrary code execution is well-matched to CWE-78. The single dampening signal is AC:H, indicating a non-trivial precondition (e.g. a specific input state, race, or crafted payload that must satisfy conditions the attacker cannot fully control), which is why the score lands at 8.1 rather than the 9.8 typical of AC:L unauthenticated RCE. On the exploitation side there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC identified at time of analysis, so there is currently no evidence of active or automated exploitation. Net: treat as a real, patch-worthy priority because it is an unauthenticated RCE-class bug on a security appliance, but the AC:H barrier plus absence of a public exploit means it is not (yet) a mass-exploitation emergency. No conflicting signals were found - the vendor CVSS, CWE, and description all agree on unauthenticated network command injection.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker with no credentials sends a crafted request to a network-exposed Guardium 12.2 interface, embedding shell metacharacters in a field that is passed unsanitized to an OS command, achieving arbitrary command execution in the appliance context. The AC:H rating implies the attacker must satisfy a specific precondition or win a timing/state window rather than firing a single deterministic request. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the affected appliance, giving full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 8.1, CWE-78). The assessed vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) means no credentials and no user interaction are needed, but exploitation is not a single deterministic request - the attacker must first satisfy a specific precondition such as a crafted payload meeting input constraints or a particular application/timing state, and the target's vulnerable network service must be reachable, which is uncommon for a security-monitoring appliance that is typically segmented. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis; a vendor patch is available per the referenced IBM support advisory.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory - IBM has published a fix through the support page at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035; because no exact fixed version string is supplied in the available data, consult that advisory for the specific 12.2 fixpack/APAR and apply it to every Guardium collector, aggregator, and central manager in the environment, verifying the fix level after upgrade. Until patching completes, reduce exposure by restricting the appliance's management and collection interfaces to trusted administrative networks with firewall rules or ACLs and by removing any internet-facing exposure - the trade-off is that remote collectors or S-TAP agents connecting from outside those allowed ranges may need temporary exceptions. Additional compensating controls: run Guardium service processes under least-privilege OS accounts so a successful injection yields less than full appliance control, and monitor appliance logs and process-spawn activity for unexpected shell invocations from the Guardium application, accepting that this is detection rather than prevention. Because no public exploit code is currently identified but the flaw is remotely triggerable without authentication, treat the segmentation controls as time-bounded until the vendor patch is in place.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, meaning user-controllable input reaches a system shell or command-execution primitive without adequate escaping, allow-listing, or argument separation. IBM Guardium Data Protection is a database activity monitoring and data-security platform whose management, collection, and aggregation components expose network services used for administration and reporting; the advisory does not name the exact endpoint, parameter, or binary carrying the unneutralized command path, so the injection surface should be treated as any externally reachable service on port-exposed Guardium 12.2 deployments. The CPE record cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, confirming the identifier is scoped by the advisory text (12.2) rather than a single build. AC:H is the key technical qualifier: the attacker's payload must land in the correct state to reach the vulnerable command path, so reliable exploitation likely depends on fingerprinting the deployment and tailoring input rather than firing a generic request. The impact metrics (C:H/I:H/A:H) indicate commands execute with the privileges of the affected Guardium process, which is typically enough to read or alter collected audit data and to pivot within the appliance.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Unauthenticated (PR:N) network-reachable OS command injection yields full C/I/A on the appliance; AC:H reflects the non-deterministic precondition implied by the vendor score.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by an OS command injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-84085, CVSS 8.1) that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute operating system commands on the appliance, placing the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the platform at full risk. Guardium underpins database activity monitoring, audit evidence, and regulatory compliance reporting for many organizations, so a successful compromise could disrupt audit coverage, expose monitored data, and force an expensive rebuild and re-validation of the monitoring estate. Leadership should note that no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis and that a vendor patch is available, while recognizing that exploitation requires the attacker to satisfy a precondition and reach the vulnerable service, which the vendor describes as uncommon given typical segmentation of security-monitoring appliances.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 75% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise database-activity-monitoring appliance, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

CVE-2026-80441 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy