Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local session
-
DeliveryInteract with Windows Error Reporting component
-
ExploitExploit missing authorization check
-
ExecutionRead restricted error data
-
ImpactDisclose sensitive information
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker to already have a local, authenticated foothold on the target Windows host with low privileges (AV:L, PR:L) and the ability to interact with the Windows Error Reporting service/component; there is no remote vector and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors: the attacker must first obtain valid low-privileged credentials or a running session on the machine, and the impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H, I:N, A:N) - the flaw neither modifies data nor affects availability, and it cannot be triggered across a network. Affected systems are Windows 10 (1809/21H2/22H2), Windows 11 (23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2), and Windows Server 2019/2022/2025 below the patched build levels listed in EUVD-2026-99319. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, locally-exploitable information disclosure flaw (CVSS 5.5) in Windows Error Reporting (WER). The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) and CISA's SSVC assessment agree on a low-urgency picture: SSVC reports Exploitation 'none', Automatable 'no', and Technical Impact only 'partial', which is consistent with a local, authenticated, confidentiality-only bug that cannot be mass-automated across the internet. No KEV listing and no public POC were provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. No EPSS score was supplied, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be compared here. The signals are internally consistent - nothing conflicts - and point to a real but non-urgent issue: it requires prior local access with low privileges (PR:L) and yields high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. One metadata caveat: the input Tag 'Authentication Bypass' conflicts with the actual weakness class (CWE-862 Missing Authorization / improper access control leading to information disclosure); this is not an authentication bypass and the tag appears mislabeled. Priority should be routine patch-cycle remediation rather than emergency response, weighted up only by the ubiquity of Windows. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged authenticated user already on a Windows host abuses improper access control in Windows Error Reporting to read error-reporting data they should not be permitted to access, disclosing sensitive information such as memory contents or data belonging to other users or higher-privileged processes. No public exploit code was identified, and the attack is strictly local (AV:L) requiring an existing foothold with low privileges. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local information disclosure in Windows Error Reporting (WER) allows an authenticated low-privileged attacker with an existing session on a Windows host to read report data that should be restricted from their privilege level, rated CVSS 5.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) under CWE-862 missing authorization. The impact is confidentiality-only: no data is modified and availability is unaffected, and because the vector is local there is no network path to exploit it, so the attacker must first hold valid low-privileged credentials or a running session on the machine. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as 'none', but vendor patches are available for the affected Windows 10 (1809/21H2/22H2), Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), and Windows Server 2019/2022/2025 builds listed in EUVD-2026-99319.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes, so update to at least the fixed build level for each branch - Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019 (and Server Core) 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 and Server 2025 10.0.26100.9711 / 10.0.26100.33650 (Server Core 10.0.26100.33650), Windows 11 25H2 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H2 10.0.26300.9711, Windows 11 26H1 10.0.28000.3231, and Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5761, as detailed in the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83658 and the EUVD record EUVD-2026-99319. Because exploitation requires an already-authenticated local low-privileged foothold (AV:L, PR:L), patch priority is lower than for remote or network-facing flaws, but the flaw is worth remediating wherever untrusted or lower-trust users share a host with sensitive workloads. Interim compensating controls, each with a trade-off: tighten NTFS ACLs on the WER artifact directories (%ProgramData%\Microsoft\Windows\WER, and any configured corporate error-reporting share or store) so that only Administrators and SYSTEM have read access, accepting that standard users and support tooling lose visibility into their own crash reports; disable the Windows Error Reporting Service (WerSvc) or suppress reporting through the policy registry value HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\Disabled = 1, at the cost of losing crash diagnostics, telemetry and supportability data; and remove unnecessary low-privileged interactive or RDP logon rights on hosts that hold sensitive data in user processes, which reduces the number of accounts capable of reaching the vulnerable surface but does not eliminate the risk for legitimate local users. None of these substitutions replace the vendor update, and the SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: partial) indicates no urgency for emergency out-of-band deployment.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 13 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Windows Error Reporting is the built-in Microsoft crash and diagnostic telemetry subsystem: the WerSvc service (Windows Error Reporting Service) and related components run with high privilege, collect user-mode and kernel error reports, minidumps and crash artifacts, stage them under locations such as %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportQueue and ReportArchive, and forward them to Microsoft or a configured corporate server via the WER/SevSnap infrastructure. The flaw is a classic missing authorization check (CWE-862), meaning the WER component fails to enforce an access-control decision on a resource or operation, so a caller holding only low privileges is served data that the design intends to restrict; the CVSS vector (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N, S:U, C:H/I:N/A:N) confirms a local, authenticated, no-interaction-read vector with high confidentiality loss and no integrity or availability impact. Practically this matters because WER artifacts are rich: minidumps can expose process memory, heap fragments, file paths, internal hostnames, and in some cases credentials or tokens captured at crash time, so cross-user or cross-process disclosure of these reports is a meaningful information-leak primitive rather than a mere logging bug. The affected platforms are the Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server branches enumerated in EUVD-2026-99319, spanning builds from 10.0.17763.x (Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019) through 10.0.19044/19045 (21H2/22H2), 10.0.20348 (Server 2022), 10.0.22631 (23H2), 10.0.26100 (24H2 / Server 2025), 10.0.26200 (25H2), 10.0.26300 (26H2) and 10.0.28000 (26H1), which indicates the issue is in shared WER code carried across the servicing branches rather than in a single OS edition.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local-only WER access abuse requires an existing low-privileged session (AV:L, PR:L), needs no user interaction, and discloses sensitive data only (C:H, I:N, A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper access control in Windows Error Reporting allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-99319
GHSA-4j35-v63p-9x8p
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB