Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach unauthenticated vCast download endpoint
-
ExploitSupply malicious APK URL
-
ExecutionTrigger unprivileged APK installation
-
ImpactExecute attacker-controlled app on ViewBoard
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Authentication mechanism validation
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Defense Evasion, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires network access to the vCast APK delivery/download endpoint, which is exposed WITHOUT authentication (PR:N) and WITHOUT any user interaction (UI:N); the attacker must be able to supply or redirect the endpoint to a malicious APK URL that the device will fetch and install. Applies to ViewSonic vCast versions v0.0.0 through v3.2.715 inclusive. LIMITING FACTORS: the attacker must be able to reach the device's download endpoint (typically same-network or otherwise routable to the ViewBoard), and the resulting installation is UNPRIVILEGED - the planted APK runs as a normal app, not system/root, so by itself it is a foothold rather than full device compromise (the public writeup chains it with further steps to reach RCE). |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.5 (HIGH) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N - network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges and no user interaction, meaning the raw exploitability is high and the flaw is trivially repeatable. CISA SSVC in the input reinforces this operationally: Automatable=yes (the unauthenticated download endpoint can be scripted en masse), but Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation) and Technical Impact=partial. There is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score was provided, so I cannot quantify real-world exploitation probability; the SSVC 'Exploitation: none' plus absence of KEV suggests no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis, despite the easy exploitability. A detailed technical exploit-chain writeup is publicly hosted (l3afs blog, 'Vcast-Viewsonic-RCE-chain') and the issue is tracked by CERT/CC (VU#234131), which materially lowers the barrier to weaponization even though SSVC still rates exploitation as none. One conflict to flag: the official vector sets C:H/I:N/A:N, but the description ('arbitrary file download ... triggers unprivileged APK installation') describes an integrity/code-delivery problem rather than a confidentiality breach, and CWE-287 (auth bypass) also does not map cleanly to a confidentiality-only impact - verify the impact metrics with the vendor/CERT. Net: this is a genuine priority for organizations running ViewSonic vCast (it is one link in a documented RCE chain), but not a drop-everything internet-wide emergency given no KEV, SSVC exploitation=none, unprivileged install scope, and missing EPSS. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network reachability to a ViewSonic ViewBoard running vCast (v3.2.715 or earlier) sends a request to the unauthenticated vCast APK download/delivery endpoint, pointing it at an attacker-controlled URL hosting a malicious APK. Because no authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N), the device fetches and installs the attacker's unprivileged APK automatically, giving the attacker a foothold application on the display - a step the published l3afs writeup chains toward full RCE. A public technical exploit-chain writeup exists, lowering the effort to reproduce this. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Remote unauthenticated attackers can make ViewSonic vCast fetch and install an attacker-supplied APK by abusing the vCast APK delivery mechanism's unauthenticated download endpoint to point the device at a malicious APK URL. Affected versions are vCast v0.0.0 through v3.2.715 inclusive on ViewSonic ViewBoard devices; the endpoint is network-reachable with no privileges and no user interaction, but the resulting installation is unprivileged, so the planted app runs as a normal application rather than with system/root rights. The supplied CVSS 3.1 base vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N (7.5), while our independent assessment treats the practical impact as C:N/I:L/A:N because the outcome is unprivileged app installation; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV active exploitation is indicated.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; the supplied references do not specify a fixed vCast version beyond the affected range through v3.2.715. Until a patched vCast release is published, restrict network reachability to the vCast APK delivery/download endpoint using firewall rules or VLAN segmentation so only trusted management hosts can reach ViewBoard devices; this lowers exposure but may disrupt centralized app deployment and remote administration. If APK delivery is not required, disable or stop the vCast/APK delivery service on affected ViewBoards, accepting the loss of remote app installation and update capability. Where configuration permits, enforce an allowlist of trusted APK sources and require APK signature verification before installation, understanding that legitimate unsigned or non-allowlisted applications will be rejected. Monitor ViewBoard and network logs for requests to untrusted APK URLs and unexpected app installations to detect exploitation attempts. Re-check CERT/CC VU#234131 at https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/234131 and the NVD entry at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82988 for a vendor fix, and apply it as soon as a patched vCast version is released.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-287 (Improper Authentication) is the root-cause class: the vCast APK delivery/download endpoint in ViewSonic ViewBoard does not properly authenticate or authorize the party controlling the APK URL, allowing a remote unauthenticated request to direct the device toward a malicious APK. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:viewsonic:vcast:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies ViewSonic vCast as the affected product line, and EUVD lists affected versions from v0.0.0 through v3.2.715. The APK delivery mechanism is intended to distribute applications to ViewBoard devices, so the flaw is an authentication bypass/access control failure on an exposed download path rather than a memory corruption or cryptographic issue. Although the supplied CVSS vector emphasizes confidentiality impact (C:H/I:N/A:N), our independent assessment scores C:N/I:L/A:N because the practical effect is an unprivileged app installation; the public writeup referenced as an RCE chain likely combines this foothold with additional steps to reach full code execution. SSVC records Exploitation: none, Automatable: yes, and Technical Impact: partial, which is consistent with the unprivileged-install limiting factor.
Know when Vcast gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Unauthenticated network endpoint with no UI (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); primary effect is installing an unprivileged attacker APK, an integrity impact (I:L), with no inherent confidentiality or availability loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (certcc).
CVSS VectorVendor: certcc
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
There exists an arbitrary file download in vCast APK delivery mechanism in ViewSonic ViewBoard unknown allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to trigger unprivileged APK installation via serving a malicious APK URL through an unauthenticated download endpoint
Executive ViewAI
ViewSonic ViewBoard devices running vCast v0.0.0 through v3.2.715 are affected by a high-severity remote unauthenticated vulnerability that can cause the device to fetch and install an attacker-supplied APK. Although the installed application does not gain system or root privileges, it can still introduce untrusted software into meeting rooms and classrooms, creating risk of data exposure or follow-on compromise. Leadership should prioritize action because affected devices are often network-connected and no vendor-released patch is available.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include disabling vCast if not required, restricting network access to the vCast APK delivery endpoint, segmenting ViewBoard devices, blocking untrusted APK download URLs, and monitoring for unauthorized application installations.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-92874
GHSA-g3x9-2gpf-9qg7
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB