Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach Guardium management interface over network
-
DeliveryCraft input with OS command metacharacters
-
ExploitBypass improper input neutralization (CWE-78)
-
ExecutionInjected command executed by appliance shell
-
ImpactFull compromise of appliance (C:H/I:H/A:H)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and requires network reachability to the affected appliance component that constructs an OS command from unsanitized attacker input (CWE-78); no authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). The key LIMITING factor is CVSS AC:H - successful exploitation depends on a specific condition beyond the attacker's direct control (such as a particular application state, input format, or reachable code path) rather than being reliably repeatable against any default install; the vendor did not specify this precondition. Real-world exposure is further limited because Guardium management interfaces are typically deployed on segmented internal/management networks rather than internet-facing, and version is constrained to 12.2. The vendor patch (IBM node 7288035) removes the vulnerability. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely serious flaw in signal terms: the vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.1 High) indicates a network-reachable, UNAUTHENTICATED (PR:N) OS command injection yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - effectively remote code execution on the appliance. The one tempering signal is AC:H, meaning successful exploitation is not trivial and depends on a precondition or non-guaranteed circumstance the vendor did not detail, which is why the score lands at 8.1 rather than the 9.8/9.9 seen for its unauthenticated Guardium siblings. Countervailing exploitation signals are all quiet: there is NO EPSS score provided, this is NOT on the CISA KEV list, and NO public proof-of-concept is referenced - so there is no evidence of active exploitation or automated weaponization at this time. This profile is best treated as a real patch-priority item (unauth + full impact + patch already available) rather than a hair-on-fire emergency: prioritize patching, but the AC:H gate and absence of KEV/POC/EPSS argue against imminent mass exploitation. Note the CVSS attack vector (AV:N) is consistent with the description's 'remote attacker' phrasing, so no vector-vs-description conflict exists here. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote attacker with network access to the Guardium Data Protection 12.2 management interface sends crafted input into a parameter that is passed to an OS command without proper neutralization of shell metacharacters, injecting attacker-controlled commands that execute on the appliance. Because the CVSS vector is PR:N, no authentication is required, but the AC:H rating implies the attacker must satisfy a specific precondition (e.g., particular input state, timing, or reachability of the vulnerable code path) for reliable exploitation. No public proof-of-concept exploit is currently identified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026
Unauthenticated OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote attacker with network reachability to a vulnerable appliance component to execute arbitrary operating system commands, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the affected system. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.1 High) confirms no authentication or user interaction is required, though the AC:H rating indicates exploitation depends on a precondition not fully specified by IBM rather than being reliably repeatable against any default install. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, but real-world risk is elevated because Guardium is a security-data platform that frequently holds sensitive audit and database activity records, and successful exploitation effectively equates to remote code execution on the appliance.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor fix for IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 as documented in IBM Support node 7288035 (https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035); the advisory is the authoritative source for the exact patched build or interim fix level, so confirm the target version there rather than assuming it, and apply the update during a maintenance window because appliance patching typically requires a restart of affected services. Where immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to restrict network access to Guardium management and appliance interfaces to a tightly scoped set of administrative hosts using firewall rules, ACLs, or jump hosts - the trade-off is reduced operational flexibility and potential disruption to legitimate administrative and integration traffic, which must be inventoried before tightening rules. Because the vector is PR:N, do not rely on authentication or role restrictions as a mitigation; instead, isolate the appliance on a dedicated management VLAN with no direct internet exposure, and monitor the appliance and adjacent systems for unexpected child processes, shell invocations, or outbound connections from the Guardium host, acknowledging that such monitoring is detective rather than preventive and will not stop a successful injection.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, commonly known as OS command injection. A component of the Guardium Data Protection appliance accepts attacker-supplied input and passes it into a shell or command-execution context without adequate sanitization, so shell metacharacters embedded in that input are interpreted by the underlying operating system rather than treated as inert data. IBM classifies the affected product generically via the CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, with the description narrowing the vulnerable release to version 12.2. Because the CVSS vector carries PR:N and UI:N, the vulnerable code path is reachable without credentials or victim interaction once an attacker can route traffic to the relevant management/appliance interface; the AC:H component reflects that a specific condition outside the attacker's direct control - such as a particular application state, input format, or code path - must be satisfied for the injection to succeed, and IBM did not document that precondition. This is a network-facing defect in a security-monitoring appliance, so post-exploitation impact extends beyond the host itself to any data, credentials, or downstream integrations the appliance manages.
Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable unauthenticated command injection (AV:N/PR:N) yielding full command execution (C:H/I:H/A:H); AC:H retained because a non-trivial precondition gates reliable exploitation.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
Executive ViewAI
The unauthenticated command injection vulnerability in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 presents a material risk to organizations that rely on this platform to secure and monitor sensitive database activity. A successful exploit could result in full compromise of the appliance, exposing regulated audit records, disrupting compliance reporting, and undermining the very security controls Guardium is designed to enforce. Leadership should treat remediation as urgent given the platform’s role in protecting high-value data.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Guardium Data Protection
View allSQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma
Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang
Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app
Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers
Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2
Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac
Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen
Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent
Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c
A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u
Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL
EUVD-2026-83409
GHSA-fgpf-phpq-hchq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB