Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection CVE-2026-82892

| EUVDEUVD-2026-83409 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-fgpf-phpq-hchq
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Guardium management interface over network
  2. Delivery
    Craft input with OS command metacharacters
  3. Exploit
    Bypass improper input neutralization (CWE-78)
  4. Execution
    Injected command executed by appliance shell
  5. Impact
    Full compromise of appliance (C:H/I:H/A:H)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and requires network reachability to the affected appliance component that constructs an OS command from unsanitized attacker input (CWE-78); no authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). The key LIMITING factor is CVSS AC:H - successful exploitation depends on a specific condition beyond the attacker's direct control (such as a particular application state, input format, or reachable code path) rather than being reliably repeatable against any default install; the vendor did not specify this precondition. Real-world exposure is further limited because Guardium management interfaces are typically deployed on segmented internal/management networks rather than internet-facing, and version is constrained to 12.2. The vendor patch (IBM node 7288035) removes the vulnerability.

Impact

This is a genuinely serious flaw in signal terms: the vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.1 High) indicates a network-reachable, UNAUTHENTICATED (PR:N) OS command injection yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - effectively remote code execution on the appliance. The one tempering signal is AC:H, meaning successful exploitation is not trivial and depends on a precondition or non-guaranteed circumstance the vendor did not detail, which is why the score lands at 8.1 rather than the 9.8/9.9 seen for its unauthenticated Guardium siblings. Countervailing exploitation signals are all quiet: there is NO EPSS score provided, this is NOT on the CISA KEV list, and NO public proof-of-concept is referenced - so there is no evidence of active exploitation or automated weaponization at this time. This profile is best treated as a real patch-priority item (unauth + full impact + patch already available) rather than a hair-on-fire emergency: prioritize patching, but the AC:H gate and absence of KEV/POC/EPSS argue against imminent mass exploitation. Note the CVSS attack vector (AV:N) is consistent with the description's 'remote attacker' phrasing, so no vector-vs-description conflict exists here.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker with network access to the Guardium Data Protection 12.2 management interface sends crafted input into a parameter that is passed to an OS command without proper neutralization of shell metacharacters, injecting attacker-controlled commands that execute on the appliance. Because the CVSS vector is PR:N, no authentication is required, but the AC:H rating implies the attacker must satisfy a specific precondition (e.g., particular input state, timing, or reachability of the vulnerable code path) for reliable exploitation. No public proof-of-concept exploit is currently identified.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

Unauthenticated OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote attacker with network reachability to a vulnerable appliance component to execute arbitrary operating system commands, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the affected system. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.1 High) confirms no authentication or user interaction is required, though the AC:H rating indicates exploitation depends on a precondition not fully specified by IBM rather than being reliably repeatable against any default install. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, but real-world risk is elevated because Guardium is a security-data platform that frequently holds sensitive audit and database activity records, and successful exploitation effectively equates to remote code execution on the appliance.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix for IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 as documented in IBM Support node 7288035 (https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035); the advisory is the authoritative source for the exact patched build or interim fix level, so confirm the target version there rather than assuming it, and apply the update during a maintenance window because appliance patching typically requires a restart of affected services. Where immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to restrict network access to Guardium management and appliance interfaces to a tightly scoped set of administrative hosts using firewall rules, ACLs, or jump hosts - the trade-off is reduced operational flexibility and potential disruption to legitimate administrative and integration traffic, which must be inventoried before tightening rules. Because the vector is PR:N, do not rely on authentication or role restrictions as a mitigation; instead, isolate the appliance on a dedicated management VLAN with no direct internet exposure, and monitor the appliance and adjacent systems for unexpected child processes, shell invocations, or outbound connections from the Guardium host, acknowledging that such monitoring is detective rather than preventive and will not stop a successful injection.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, commonly known as OS command injection. A component of the Guardium Data Protection appliance accepts attacker-supplied input and passes it into a shell or command-execution context without adequate sanitization, so shell metacharacters embedded in that input are interpreted by the underlying operating system rather than treated as inert data. IBM classifies the affected product generically via the CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, with the description narrowing the vulnerable release to version 12.2. Because the CVSS vector carries PR:N and UI:N, the vulnerable code path is reachable without credentials or victim interaction once an attacker can route traffic to the relevant management/appliance interface; the AC:H component reflects that a specific condition outside the attacker's direct control - such as a particular application state, input format, or code path - must be satisfied for the injection to succeed, and IBM did not document that precondition. This is a network-facing defect in a security-monitoring appliance, so post-exploitation impact extends beyond the host itself to any data, credentials, or downstream integrations the appliance manages.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable unauthenticated command injection (AV:N/PR:N) yielding full command execution (C:H/I:H/A:H); AC:H retained because a non-trivial precondition gates reliable exploitation.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The unauthenticated command injection vulnerability in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 presents a material risk to organizations that rely on this platform to secure and monitor sensitive database activity. A successful exploit could result in full compromise of the appliance, exposing regulated audit records, disrupting compliance reporting, and undermining the very security controls Guardium is designed to enforce. Leadership should treat remediation as urgent given the platform’s role in protecting high-value data.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 68% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise database-activity-monitoring appliance, limited production footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

CVE-2026-80441 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy