Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege Guardium account
-
DeliverySubmit input with shell metacharacters to vulnerable command handler
-
ExploitImproper neutralization passes payload to OS shell
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary commands on appliance
-
ImpactFull compromise of monitored database-activity data (C/I/A)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a valid authenticated session on IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 at low privilege (CVSS PR:L) - this is not unauthenticated. Exploitation then depends only on reaching the feature that passes user-controlled input into an OS command; no user interaction and no non-default configuration are indicated by the CVSS vector (AC:L/UI:N). Limiting factors: the appliance's management interface must be network-reachable to the attacker, and valid credentials (even low-privilege) are needed, so realistic risk centers on malicious insiders, compromised operator accounts, or attackers who have already gained a foothold. The specific vulnerable input/feature is not disclosed in the description. |
| Impact | This is a genuine, exploitable-by-authenticated-users OS command injection (CWE-78) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) is internally consistent and credible: network-reachable, low attack complexity, only low privileges required, no user interaction, and full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability via arbitrary command execution. All decision signals point one way for exploitability but temper real-world urgency: there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC identified at time of analysis - exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' A vendor patch is already available (IBM node 7288035), which is the strongest mitigating signal. Net: this is a legitimately high-severity flaw that warrants prompt patching for any org running Guardium, but the absence of KEV/POC/EPSS and the requirement for valid low-privilege authentication mean it is not an internet-scale mass-exploitation threat - it is an insider/post-authentication privilege-escalation-to-RCE risk. Note the description's 'could allow' phrasing is standard IBM advisory hedging, not evidence of non-exploitability. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker holding a low-privilege authenticated account on the Guardium appliance (or one who has phished/stolen such credentials) submits input containing shell metacharacters to a feature that passes it to an OS command without proper neutralization. Because the special elements are not sanitized, the injected commands execute on the appliance host, giving the attacker arbitrary command execution with the service's privileges. No public POC exists at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026
Authenticated OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote attacker holding a valid low-privilege session to execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the affected appliance, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1 base 8.8). The flaw is rated AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U, so exploitation requires credentials - authentication requirements are confirmed as authenticated (PR:L) by the assessed vector - but no user interaction and no non-default configuration; the specific vulnerable feature and input parameter are not disclosed in the advisory, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis (not listed in CISA KEV). Realistic risk therefore centers on malicious insiders, compromised or reused operator accounts, and attackers who have already established a foothold on the management network, and IBM states a vendor patch is available.
RemediationAI
Patch availability is confirmed by IBM: 'Patch available per vendor advisory' - consult https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035 for the fixed build applicable to Guardium Data Protection 12.2, since no exact fix version number is stated in the supplied data and none should be assumed. Until the appliance is updated, the highest-value compensating controls follow directly from the PR:L precondition: enforce least privilege and account hygiene so that low-privilege operator credentials cannot be reused, shared, or phished, and enable MFA on the Guardium management interface - trade-off is added login friction for administrators but it directly removes the easiest path to the required session. Restrict network reachability of the management interface to a dedicated administrative VLAN or jump host with IP allow-listing, since the vector is AV:N - trade-off is reduced operational flexibility for remote administrators and a need for a documented break-glass path. Audit and rotate credentials for all low-privilege accounts and review recent sessions for anomalous command or configuration activity, noting that detection is weakened by the fact that the vulnerable feature has not been publicly identified. Because the specific vulnerable input is undisclosed, there is no reliable way to disable a single offending feature without vendor guidance, so deploy monitoring on the appliance for unexpected child processes spawned by Guardium services and treat any suspicious shell activity from the web/management tier as a potential compromise.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, the classic command-injection class in which attacker-supplied text is concatenated into a shell or process invocation without escaping, allow-listing, or argument separation. In IBM Guardium Data Protection - a database activity monitoring and data security platform whose appliance exposes an administrative management interface for configuration, policy, and reporting - the vulnerable code path takes input from an authenticated session and passes it to an operating-system command, allowing shell metacharacters to break out of the intended command and run arbitrary commands under the privileges of the Guardium process (typically an appliance service account). The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates the attack is network-reachable, low-complexity, and requires only low privileges, with no scope change; the published CPE, cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, is a wildcard that does not itself pin a version range, while ENISA EUVD (EUVD-2026-83313) narrows the affected release to Guardium Data Protection 12.2. Because the vendor advisory does not identify which feature or parameter is injectable, the exact injection surface cannot be enumerated from the available data; the practical precondition is that a low-privilege authenticated user can reach an interface component that shells out with user-controlled input, which is why the effect escalates from limited operator rights to full command execution on the appliance.
Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable management interface (AV:N), straightforward injection (AC:L), only a low-privilege authenticated account needed (PR:L), no interaction (UI:N); arbitrary command execution yields full C/I/A.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorVendor: ibm
DescriptionCVE.org
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, the platform our teams rely on to monitor and protect sensitive database activity, contains an authenticated command-injection flaw rated CVSS 8.8 that would let someone with a valid low-privilege account run arbitrary operating-system commands on the appliance. Because exploitation requires credentials but no user interaction, the practical exposure sits with insiders, shared or stale operator accounts, and attackers who have already reached the management network - meaning a single compromised login could hand over control of a system that holds audit and data-protection visibility across the estate. Leadership should treat this as a containment and credential-hygiene issue for the security operations and database platform teams, not a broad internet-facing emergency.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Guardium Data Protection
View allSQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma
Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang
Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app
Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers
Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2
Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac
Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen
Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent
Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c
A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u
Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL
EUVD-2026-83313
GHSA-5rg7-x363-pvjp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB