Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection CVE-2026-82887

| EUVDEUVD-2026-83313 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-5rg7-x363-pvjp
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege Guardium account
  2. Delivery
    Submit input with shell metacharacters to vulnerable command handler
  3. Exploit
    Improper neutralization passes payload to OS shell
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary commands on appliance
  5. Impact
    Full compromise of monitored database-activity data (C/I/A)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid authenticated session on IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 at low privilege (CVSS PR:L) - this is not unauthenticated. Exploitation then depends only on reaching the feature that passes user-controlled input into an OS command; no user interaction and no non-default configuration are indicated by the CVSS vector (AC:L/UI:N). Limiting factors: the appliance's management interface must be network-reachable to the attacker, and valid credentials (even low-privilege) are needed, so realistic risk centers on malicious insiders, compromised operator accounts, or attackers who have already gained a foothold. The specific vulnerable input/feature is not disclosed in the description.

Impact

This is a genuine, exploitable-by-authenticated-users OS command injection (CWE-78) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) is internally consistent and credible: network-reachable, low attack complexity, only low privileges required, no user interaction, and full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability via arbitrary command execution. All decision signals point one way for exploitability but temper real-world urgency: there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC identified at time of analysis - exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' A vendor patch is already available (IBM node 7288035), which is the strongest mitigating signal. Net: this is a legitimately high-severity flaw that warrants prompt patching for any org running Guardium, but the absence of KEV/POC/EPSS and the requirement for valid low-privilege authentication mean it is not an internet-scale mass-exploitation threat - it is an insider/post-authentication privilege-escalation-to-RCE risk. Note the description's 'could allow' phrasing is standard IBM advisory hedging, not evidence of non-exploitability.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker holding a low-privilege authenticated account on the Guardium appliance (or one who has phished/stolen such credentials) submits input containing shell metacharacters to a feature that passes it to an OS command without proper neutralization. Because the special elements are not sanitized, the injected commands execute on the appliance host, giving the attacker arbitrary command execution with the service's privileges. No public POC exists at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

Authenticated OS command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote attacker holding a valid low-privilege session to execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the affected appliance, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 3.1 base 8.8). The flaw is rated AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U, so exploitation requires credentials - authentication requirements are confirmed as authenticated (PR:L) by the assessed vector - but no user interaction and no non-default configuration; the specific vulnerable feature and input parameter are not disclosed in the advisory, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis (not listed in CISA KEV). Realistic risk therefore centers on malicious insiders, compromised or reused operator accounts, and attackers who have already established a foothold on the management network, and IBM states a vendor patch is available.

RemediationAI

Patch availability is confirmed by IBM: 'Patch available per vendor advisory' - consult https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035 for the fixed build applicable to Guardium Data Protection 12.2, since no exact fix version number is stated in the supplied data and none should be assumed. Until the appliance is updated, the highest-value compensating controls follow directly from the PR:L precondition: enforce least privilege and account hygiene so that low-privilege operator credentials cannot be reused, shared, or phished, and enable MFA on the Guardium management interface - trade-off is added login friction for administrators but it directly removes the easiest path to the required session. Restrict network reachability of the management interface to a dedicated administrative VLAN or jump host with IP allow-listing, since the vector is AV:N - trade-off is reduced operational flexibility for remote administrators and a need for a documented break-glass path. Audit and rotate credentials for all low-privilege accounts and review recent sessions for anomalous command or configuration activity, noting that detection is weakened by the fact that the vulnerable feature has not been publicly identified. Because the specific vulnerable input is undisclosed, there is no reliable way to disable a single offending feature without vendor guidance, so deploy monitoring on the appliance for unexpected child processes spawned by Guardium services and treat any suspicious shell activity from the web/management tier as a potential compromise.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, the classic command-injection class in which attacker-supplied text is concatenated into a shell or process invocation without escaping, allow-listing, or argument separation. In IBM Guardium Data Protection - a database activity monitoring and data security platform whose appliance exposes an administrative management interface for configuration, policy, and reporting - the vulnerable code path takes input from an authenticated session and passes it to an operating-system command, allowing shell metacharacters to break out of the intended command and run arbitrary commands under the privileges of the Guardium process (typically an appliance service account). The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates the attack is network-reachable, low-complexity, and requires only low privileges, with no scope change; the published CPE, cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, is a wildcard that does not itself pin a version range, while ENISA EUVD (EUVD-2026-83313) narrows the affected release to Guardium Data Protection 12.2. Because the vendor advisory does not identify which feature or parameter is injectable, the exact injection surface cannot be enumerated from the available data; the practical precondition is that a low-privilege authenticated user can reach an interface component that shells out with user-controlled input, which is why the effect escalates from limited operator rights to full command execution on the appliance.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable management interface (AV:N), straightforward injection (AC:L), only a low-privilege authenticated account needed (PR:L), no interaction (UI:N); arbitrary command execution yields full C/I/A.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, the platform our teams rely on to monitor and protect sensitive database activity, contains an authenticated command-injection flaw rated CVSS 8.8 that would let someone with a valid low-privilege account run arbitrary operating-system commands on the appliance. Because exploitation requires credentials but no user interaction, the practical exposure sits with insiders, shared or stale operator accounts, and attackers who have already reached the management network - meaning a single compromised login could hand over control of a system that holds audit and data-protection visibility across the estate. Leadership should treat this as a containment and credential-hygiene issue for the security operations and database platform teams, not a broad internet-facing emergency.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 65% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise database-activity-monitoring appliance, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

CVE-2026-80441 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy