Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection CVE-2026-81669

| EUVDEUVD-2026-83307 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-09-18 ibm GHSA-97mm-h99g-pggx
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain privileged CLI credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to Guardium CLI over SSH
  3. Exploit
    Run 'create csr wildcard' with malicious alias
  4. Execution
    Inject shell metacharacters into alias input
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary commands as root
  6. Impact
    Full appliance compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated PRIVILEGED CLI user on IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 who can invoke the 'create csr wildcard' command; the injection point is the 'alias' input parameter, into which shell metacharacters/commands are embedded to break out of the restricted CLI. Limiting factors: the attacker must already possess privileged CLI credentials and CLI access (typically SSH) to the appliance (PR:H), so this is not remotely exploitable by an unauthenticated actor - it functions as a restricted-shell-to-root privilege escalation. Successful injection yields command execution with root privileges on the appliance.

Impact

The vendor rates this 7.2 High (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), and the vector is internally consistent with the description: exploitation requires an already-authenticated, PRIVILEGED CLI user (PR:H), so this is fundamentally a privilege-escalation/restricted-shell-escape rather than an unauthenticated remote compromise. AV:N is defensible because the Guardium CLI is typically reached over SSH, but the real gating factor is that the attacker must already hold privileged CLI credentials - the payoff is that command injection via the 'create csr wildcard' alias input yields full root code execution, breaking the appliance's restricted-shell containment (justifying C:H/I:H/A:H). There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC in the provided intelligence, so no signals point to active or imminent widespread exploitation; the combination of high privilege prerequisite and low real-world prevalence makes this a genuine-but-lower-urgency issue best handled through normal patch cycles. This is a real defense-in-depth fix (privileged-CLI-to-root escalation) but not an internet-facing unauthenticated critical - treat it as important for the specific population of Guardium 12.2 operators rather than a broad emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An operator (or an attacker who has already obtained privileged Guardium CLI credentials, e.g. via credential theft or a malicious insider) logs into the appliance CLI and runs the 'create csr wildcard' command, supplying an alias value containing embedded shell metacharacters and commands. The injected commands execute as root, letting the attacker escape the restricted CLI and gain full control of the appliance. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and successful exploitation depends on first holding privileged CLI access.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 1.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

Command injection in the 'create csr wildcard' CLI command of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an authenticated privileged CLI user to embed shell metacharacters in the 'alias' input, breaking out of the restricted CLI and executing arbitrary commands with root privileges on the appliance. The CVSS v3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 7.2 High) confirms this is not an unauthenticated remote compromise: the attacker must already hold privileged CLI credentials and CLI access, typically over SSH, making this fundamentally a restricted-shell-to-root privilege escalation rather than an external initial-access vector. Impact is total for confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the appliance given the root-level execution context; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and CISA KEV does not list this CVE as actively exploited.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix for IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 as documented in IBM support flash https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288040; patch availability is confirmed by IBM, but no specific fixed build number is provided in the available data, so consult the advisory to confirm the exact patched version for your deployment track before considering the appliance remediated. Until the fix is applied, the most effective compensating control is to treat the Guardium CLI as a high-value administrative interface: restrict SSH/CLI access to the smallest possible set of trusted operators and network ranges (for example via management-network ACLs, jump hosts, or bastion access), since exploitation requires an already-privileged CLI account - this reduces the population of potential attackers but does not protect against a malicious or compromised privileged insider. As an additional hardening measure, monitor CLI command auditing/logs for invocations of 'create csr wildcard' containing shell metacharacters (;, |, $(), backticks, &&) and alert on them, acknowledging that this is detective rather than preventive. Avoid granting shared or generic privileged CLI accounts, and rotate credentials for any account that may have been used to exercise the vulnerable command. Note that these mitigations carry trade-offs: tightening CLI access can impede legitimate administrative workflows, and log-based detection will miss an attacker who can also tamper with the appliance's own audit trail once root is obtained.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), a classic command-injection weakness in which user-supplied input is passed to a shell without adequate sanitization or parameterization. IBM Guardium Data Protection exposes a restricted administrative CLI to appliance operators, and the 'create csr wildcard' subcommand generates a certificate signing request while accepting an 'alias' value that is ultimately interpolated into a system command. Because the CLI runs with elevated privileges on the underlying Linux-based Guardium appliance, shell metacharacters placed in the alias prentice the attacker to escape the CLI sandbox and run arbitrary OS commands as root. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, version-agnostic in the feed, but EUVD and the vendor both scope the flaw to the 12.2 release line. This class of bug is particularly dangerous on security appliances like Guardium, where root access undermines the integrity of the audit, monitoring, and data-protection functions the product exists to enforce.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Privileged CLI credentials required (PR:H) reachable over SSH (AV:N); injection is reliable (AC:L) and yields root, so C:H/I:H/A:H with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the create csr wildcard CLI command. An authenticated privileged CLI user can inject arbitrary shell commands through the alias input, resulting in command execution with root privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, an appliance that organizations rely on to monitor and protect sensitive database activity, contains a command-injection flaw that lets someone who already holds privileged CLI credentials break out of the restricted shell and run commands as root on the appliance. Because root control of this system can expose audit data and stored credentials and allows those records to be altered or destroyed, the exposure is significant for any team using Guardium as a system of record for compliance and monitoring. The vulnerability is not remotely exploitable by outsiders and no public exploit code has been identified, so the practical risk concentrates on misuse by insiders or attackers who have already obtained privileged CLI access.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.3%
Top 30% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise database-activity-monitoring appliance, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

CVE-2026-80441 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy