Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessSubmit unauthenticated web form with XSS payload
-
DeliveryPayload stored unescaped in WordPress database
-
ExploitAdmin navigates to form submissions admin view
-
ExecutionStored script executes in admin browser context
-
ImpactExfiltrate session token or silently create rogue admin account
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the Groundhogg plugin to be installed, active, and at a version prior to 4.5.13 on the target WordPress site, with at least one publicly accessible web form exposing the optional fields that lack server-side escaping. No authentication is required to submit the malicious payload (PR:N per CVSS vector). Achieving impact additionally requires a privileged WordPress user with access to the Groundhogg administrative form submissions view to actively navigate to that page after submission, triggering the stored script (UI:R per CVSS vector). Sites that do not expose Groundhogg web forms to the public, or that have the form feature disabled, are not exploitable at the injection stage. The required admin-interaction step limits fully automated end-to-end exploitation and materially distinguishes this from zero-interaction network vulnerabilities despite the PR:N initial access. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects the near-zero attacker friction and high potential impact reasonably, though the S:U assignment may understate the true severity - stored XSS that executes inside a privileged admin session crosses a meaningful authorization boundary that many frameworks would score as S:C, which would push the score above 9.0. The low EPSS score of 0.17% (7th percentile) is notably inconsistent with both the high CVSS and confirmed public POC availability, suggesting that the UI:R dependency materially suppresses automated exploitation feasibility in observed telemetry. No CISA KEV listing exists, confirming no widespread active exploitation is confirmed at time of analysis. The attack cost is near-zero for the injection step - any anonymous visitor can submit a web form - while the payoff (admin session compromise) is high-value, meaning even deployments with modest traffic warrant treating this as a priority patch rather than deferring based on EPSS alone. The SSVC technical impact is total, but end-to-end automation is constrained by the required admin-view interaction, which meaningfully differentiates this from fully hands-off vulnerabilities. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker locates a WordPress site running Groundhogg before 4.5.13 and submits a web form with a JavaScript payload - such as a cookie-exfiltration or rogue-admin-creation script - embedded in an optional field that the plugin stores without escaping; a public proof-of-concept demonstrates this technique. The payload persists in the WordPress database alongside legitimate submissions. When a WordPress administrator subsequently navigates to the Groundhogg form submissions view in the admin panel, the stored script executes in their browser, enabling the attacker to steal the session cookie or silently escalate to a persistent admin account. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 31, 2026
Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the Groundhogg - CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin before version 4.5.13 allows unauthenticated attackers to inject persistent malicious scripts through optional web form fields, which subsequently execute in the browsers of privileged administrative users. Successful exploitation can yield full administrative session compromise, unauthorized rogue account creation, or arbitrary site modification. A publicly available proof-of-concept is confirmed by WPScan; however, EPSS remains low at 0.17% (7th percentile), indicating limited observed mass exploitation despite that availability.
RemediationAI
Update the Groundhogg plugin to version 4.5.13 or later using the WordPress admin dashboard under Plugins > Installed Plugins > Update, or via WP-CLI with 'wp plugin update groundhogg'. The patch is confirmed available from the vendor per the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/cfdb4107-6010-4c29-baf3-3111765f48c2/. As a temporary compensating control prior to patching, administrators can restrict access to the Groundhogg form submissions administrative view using WordPress capability controls, which prevents payload execution but does not prevent malicious data from being stored - any stored payloads will execute once the restriction is lifted without patching. Web application firewall rules targeting script injection patterns in POST parameters can reduce submission success but are bypassable via encoding and must not substitute for the vendor patch. Disabling the Groundhogg web form feature entirely eliminates the public-facing injection surface if forms are not operationally required during the patch window.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Groundhogg is a WordPress plugin providing CRM, email marketing campaign management, and marketing automation, enabling site visitors to submit data through configurable web forms. The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation - Cross-Site Scripting), specifically a persistent/stored variant: optional web form field values are neither server-side validated nor output-escaped before being written to the WordPress database and subsequently rendered inside the administrative dashboard. This allows user-supplied JavaScript to survive server-side processing intact and execute in an admin's browser context when privileged users navigate to the form submissions view. The CPE identifier cpe:2.3:a:unknown:groundhogg_-_crm,_newsletters,_and_marketing_automation:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* reflects an unresolved NVD vendor mapping; the plugin is published by Groundhogg Inc. on the WordPress.org repository and the 'unknown' vendor field is a data-pipeline artifact, not indicative of an unidentified vendor.
Know when Groundhogg Crm Newsletters And Marketing Automation gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
PR:N because form submission is unauthenticated; S:C because the attack crosses from the public form context into a privileged admin browser session.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
The Groundhogg - CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin before 4.5.13 does not validate or escape values submitted to some optional web form fields before storing them and outputting them back in an administrative area, allowing unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against high privilege users.
Technical POC Analysis
Bug class: CWE-79, Stored Cross-Site Scripting.
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
Organizations using the Groundhogg WordPress plugin (versions prior to 4.5.13) face risk of administrative account compromise and unauthorized website modification through a form-based vulnerability accessible to any website visitor. Successful exploitation can result in data theft, malware deployment, or reputational damage. Leadership should prioritize immediate patching and audit of affected systems.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Privilege escalation in the Groundhogg - CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress versions up to
Privilege escalation in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin (all versions up to a
Open redirect in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin (versions before 4.7.2) allo
Arbitrary file deletion in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters and Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress (all versions u
Privilege escalation in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters & Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress (all versions throug
Stored cross-site scripting in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin (all versions
SQL Injection in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin (all versions through 4.5.8)
Insecure Direct Object Reference in the Groundhogg WordPress plugin (all versions through 4.5.2) allows authenticated us
SQL injection in the Groundhogg WordPress CRM plugin (versions through 4.5.14) permits authenticated attackers holding v
SQL Injection in the Groundhogg WordPress CRM plugin (all versions through 4.5.5) allows authenticated attackers holding
SQL Injection in the Groundhogg WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 4.5.4) allows any authenticated WordPress
SQL injection in the Groundhogg CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation WordPress plugin exposes the underlying WordP
EUVD-2026-68159
GHSA-c4g6-w433-v47v
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB