Skip to main content

Hi.Events CVE-2026-76838

| EUVDEUVD-2026-65010 HIGH
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-08-24 VulnCheck GHSA-j9wc-mrp3-532h
8.4
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Authenticate to Hi.Events with low-privilege account
  2. Delivery
    Register webhook pointing to attacker-controlled domain
  3. Exploit
    Domain passes registration-time IP check
  4. Install
    Reconfigure domain DNS or HTTP response to redirect to internal/metadata IP
  5. C2
    Wait for or trigger webhook dispatch event
  6. Execute
    Server follows redirect to 169.254.169.254 or internal service
  7. Impact
    Exfiltrate internal service response from webhook logs API

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid Hi.Events platform account with permission to register webhooks - the CVSS PR:L metric confirms a low-privilege authenticated session is sufficient; unauthenticated access is not possible. The attacker must additionally control a domain that can be configured to serve an HTTP redirect to an internal or reserved IP address (covering the redirect-based path), or a domain whose DNS record can be changed after webhook registration before the next dispatch (covering the DNS rebinding path). The Hi.Events server must have outbound HTTP access to the targeted internal resource; cloud-hosted instances with accessible IMDS endpoints represent the highest-risk deployment. No non-default platform configuration is required - webhook functionality is a standard feature. Exploitation is bounded by: the authentication requirement limiting anonymous mass exploitation, and the need for attacker control over a DNS record or a redirect-serving endpoint.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N correctly captures the threat profile: the attack is network-reachable, requires no special conditions beyond a low-privilege account, and produces high confidentiality impact on both the vulnerable system and subsequent systems such as cloud metadata services. The subsequent-system confidentiality impact (SC:H) reflects the ability to reach AWS IMDS (169.254.169.254), GCP metadata (metadata.google.internal), or internal APIs and return their responses verbatim to the attacker - an impact level consistent with IAM credential theft in cloud-hosted deployments. EPSS data was not supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified against the broader threat landscape. The CVE is not in CISA KEV and no public exploit code has been identified, but the attack technique (redirect-based SSRF and DNS rebinding) is thoroughly documented in public SSRF literature and the entire codebase is open source, meaning the vulnerable path is trivially auditable. The PR:L authentication requirement is the primary limiting factor: an attacker must hold a valid platform account with webhook-registration permission. For any deployment running on a cloud provider with an accessible IMDS endpoint - the common case for SaaS-style Hi.Events installs - this should be treated as a high-priority patch.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated Hi.Events organizer registers a webhook pointing to a domain they control (e.g., attacker.example.com), which resolves to a legitimate public IP at registration time, passing the NoInternalUrlRule check. Before the next event trigger fires the webhook, the attacker reconfigures attacker.example.com to respond with an HTTP 301 redirect to http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/role-name. When the webhook dispatches, the server follows the redirect, retrieves the cloud IAM credentials from the metadata service, and stores the response body in the webhook log; the attacker then reads the credentials directly from the webhook logs API endpoint. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the attack technique requires no specialized tooling.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 24, 2026

Server-side request forgery in Hi.Events (all versions prior to 1.11.1-beta) allows an authenticated platform user to exfiltrate responses from internal network services, including cloud metadata endpoints, by exploiting a time-of-check/time-of-use gap in webhook URL validation. The registration-time guard in NoInternalUrlRule is never repeated at dispatch, and Guzzle's default redirect-following allows a destination that answers with a redirect to a loopback or RFC-1918 address to cause the server to issue the secondary request. Critically, this is not blind SSRF: WebhookResponseHandlerService stores the response body and WebhookLogResource exposes it via the webhook logs API, enabling direct credential or secret exfiltration. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to Hi.Events 1.11.1-beta, which resolves the vulnerability by revalidating the webhook URL at every dispatch invocation, pinning the IP address resolved at registration time, inspecting every redirect hop against the private-range blocklist, and normalizing IPv6 transition addresses before comparison. The patch commit cfbf468bb5b1 (https://github.com/HiEventsDev/Hi.Events/commit/cfbf468bb5b1) and the full diff in PR #1311 (https://github.com/HiEventsDev/Hi.Events/pull/1311) are publicly available for review. If immediate upgrade is not possible, disable webhook functionality for untrusted or low-privilege users at the application-access-control layer. As a network-level compensating control, configure egress firewall rules on the Hi.Events server to block outbound HTTP/HTTPS to RFC 1918 ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16), loopback (127.0.0.0/8), and cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254 and its IPv6 equivalents); note that this control must be enforced at the network layer because the application-layer check is the component that was bypassed. Disabling Guzzle redirect-following in backend/config/webhook-server.php eliminates the redirect-based attack path but does not address DNS rebinding, so it is insufficient as a standalone mitigation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Hi.Events 0 <1.11.1-beta

Affected Packages

euvd hi_events fix: 1.11.1-beta

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Hi.Events is an open-source PHP/Laravel event-ticketing platform identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:hieventsdev:hi.events:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), specifically a TOCTOU design flaw: NoInternalUrlRule resolves the webhook hostname with PHP's gethostbyname() and rejects private/reserved ranges only at registration time. At dispatch, WebhookDispatchService passes the stored URL directly to spatie/laravel-webhook-server, which uses Guzzle internally. Because backend/config/webhook-server.php sets no allow_redirects override, Guzzle follows HTTP 3xx redirects by default, providing the redirect-based attack path. A separate DNS rebinding path exists because no IP pinning was performed at registration - if the hostname's DNS record changes between registration and dispatch, the new address is used without scrutiny. Both event-level and organizer-level webhooks share the same validation rule and dispatch service. The fix in 1.11.1-beta (commit cfbf468bb5b1, PR #1311) revalidates at dispatch, pins the resolved IP, checks every redirect hop, and decodes IPv6 transition addresses such as IPv4-mapped IPv6 (::ffff:169.254.169.254) that previously bypassed the filter.

Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 8.4 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.5 HIGH

Network-reachable via webhook trigger; low-privilege auth required; scope changes because server is induced to access other internal systems; high confidentiality impact from response exfiltration; low integrity impact from potential internal side-effects.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
Low
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Hi.Events validates a webhook destination only when it is registered, never when it is used. NoInternalUrlRule in backend/app/Validators/Rules/NoInternalUrlRule.php resolves the hostname with gethostbyname() and rejects private and reserved ranges, which any public hostname passes. At dispatch, WebhookDispatchService takes the stored URL and calls it through spatie/laravel-webhook-server without repeating the check, and backend/config/webhook-server.php sets no Guzzle options, so redirect following remains enabled by default. A destination that answers with a redirect to a loopback, private or cloud metadata address therefore causes the server to issue that request, and changing the hostname's DNS record after registration reaches the same result because no resolution is repeated. The response is not discarded: WebhookResponseHandlerService stores the body on the webhook log and WebhookLogResource returns it from the webhook logs endpoint, so the requester reads what the internal service replied rather than inferring it. Both event and organizer webhooks share the rule and the dispatch path. Version 1.11.1-beta revalidates at dispatch, pins the validated address, checks every redirect hop, and decodes IPv6 transition addresses that previously bypassed the filter.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Hi.Events webhook functionality (versions prior to 1.11.1-beta) contains a vulnerability allowing authenticated platform users to exfiltrate cloud credentials, secrets, and access tokens. Attackers with a legitimate Hi.Events user account can configure webhooks that return sensitive data from internal services and cloud infrastructure, exposing this data through application logs. Compromised credentials enable unauthorized access to your cloud infrastructure and lateral network movement, creating material risk of infrastructure compromise.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
open-source event ticketing platform with limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

More in PHP

View all
CVE-2019-11043 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 28

In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it

CVE-2012-1823 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 11

sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not

CVE-2016-1555 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 21

(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear

CVE-2018-11138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 31

The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by

CVE-2024-11680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 26

ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C

CVE-2025-49113 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 02

Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au

CVE-2017-9841 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 27

Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c

CVE-2025-0108 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 12

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers

CVE-2021-25298 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2021-25296 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 15

Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re

CVE-2013-4983 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 10

The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy