Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent network position (same L2/RF)
-
ExploitSend crafted PAPI protocol packets
-
ExecutionBypass AP authentication controls
-
ImpactInject unauthorized traffic to device
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Authentication mechanism validation
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Defense Evasion, Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Attacker must be network-ADJACENT to the target (AV:A): same Layer 2 broadcast domain / VLAN as the AP, or otherwise able to reach the AP's PAPI control-plane interface (Aruba/HPE PAPI is the AP management/provisioning protocol, historically UDP/8211), not routable from the internet. No authentication (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) are required, and complexity is low (AC:L). Affected: HPE Networking Instant On APs running firmware ≤3.4.1.0. The principal limiting factor is the adjacency requirement - exploitation needs an existing on-network or on-air position - which substantially narrows realistic exposure versus a routable remote flaw. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, credible-but-not-urgent risk. The vendor CVSS of 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N) describes an unauthenticated, low-complexity authentication bypass reachable only from an ADJACENT position (AV:A) - the attacker must be on the same Layer 2 segment / broadcast domain or within RF/management reach of the AP, not the open internet. Impact is integrity-only and high (I:H: the attacker circumvents auth controls and injects unauthorized network traffic to the device), with no confidentiality (C:N) or availability (A:N) consequence claimed. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit - status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No SSVC decision data was supplied. The signals are internally consistent (adjacent + unauth + integrity bypass), so there is no contradiction to flag; the main tempering factor is the adjacency requirement, which converts this from an internet-wide risk into an on-network/on-air threat. CWE is 'N/A' in the input, which is a minor data gap but does not change the assessment. Net: a real issue worth patching on a normal cycle, not a drop-everything emergency, given adjacency scope, integrity-only impact, and absence of exploitation signals. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a foothold on the same LAN/VLAN as an Instant On access point - for example a rogue device on a guest or SMB office network, or a compromised host in the broadcast domain - crafts malformed PAPI protocol messages to the AP's management interface. Because the AP fails to properly enforce authentication on these control-plane requests, the attacker circumvents the auth check and sends unauthorized network traffic to the device. No public proof-of-concept is known. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 29, 2026
Authentication bypass in the PAPI control-plane protocol of HPE Networking Instant On access points running firmware 3.4.1.0 and earlier allows an unauthenticated attacker on the same Layer 2 segment to circumvent existing authentication controls and push unauthorized traffic to the device. The issue is rated CVSS 6.5 (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, integrity-only impact) because exploitation requires an adjacent network position rather than internet reachability, and the PAPI interface is not routable from the public internet. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, the flaw is not confirmed actively exploited (not in CISA KEV), and the principal exposure limiter is the requirement for an existing on-network or on-air foothold.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Instant On AP firmware to a release above 3.4.1.0 per the HPE security bulletin at https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05150en_us&docLocale=en_US; the exact patched build is not specified in the available data, so confirm the fixed version against that advisory before rolling out. Until firmware is updated, the effective compensating controls all target the adjacency prerequisite: place AP management interfaces and PAPI traffic (historically UDP/8211) on a dedicated management VLAN that is not shared with user or guest traffic, and enforce firewall/ACL rules permitting PAPI only from known management hosts - the trade-off is that overly tight scoping can break AP discovery, controller-assisted provisioning, and centralized management, so validate onboarding flows first. Enable wireless client isolation and wired 802.1X/port security on access ports to make it harder for an attacker to obtain the Layer 2 position needed for exploitation, with the trade-off of extra onboarding and troubleshooting effort. Disable unused management and discovery services on the APs where the platform allows it, accepting that this may remove functionality some deployments rely on. Finally, monitor for unexpected PAPI traffic or anomalous provisioning requests from non-management segments, since detection rather than prevention may be the only option for unpatched APs already exposed to shared Layer 2 segments.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
PAPI (Aruba/HPE's Access Point provisioning and management protocol, historically carried over UDP/8211) is the control plane used to discover, provision, and manage Instant On access points. CVE-2026-76730 is an authentication/authorization weakness in that protocol implementation: the AP fails to correctly enforce its authentication state, so an attacker who can reach the PAPI service can interact with it without presenting valid credentials and cause unauthorized network traffic to be sent to the target device. Although no CWE was supplied, the behaviour maps to the improper-authentication / authentication-bypass class (CWE-287 lineage), specifically a missing or insufficiently validated credential check on a management-protocol handler. The CVSS vector AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N confirms the attack is adjacent-network based, low complexity, requires no credentials and no user interaction, and produces a high integrity impact with no confidentiality or availability impact - consistent with an attacker injecting or manipulating provisioning/traffic parameters rather than extracting secrets or crashing the AP. The supplied CPE, cpe:2.3:a:hewlett_packard_enterprise_(hpe):instant_on:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, is version-wildcarded, so the precise vulnerable code base is defined by the EUVD version data ('Instant On 0.0.0.0 ≤ 3.4.1.0') rather than by the CPE string itself.
Know when Instant On gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Adjacent PAPI control-plane reach (AV:A), no auth or interaction (PR:N/UI:N), low complexity; auth bypass yields unauthorized traffic injection so I:H with no confidentiality or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).
CVSS VectorVendor: hpe
DescriptionCVE.org
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the PAPI protocol of HPE Networking Instant ON APs that could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to circumvent certain existing authentication mechanisms and send unauthorized network traffic to the target device.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Instant On
View allUnauthenticated remote command execution is possible on HPE Networking Instant On access points running firmware version
Unauthenticated remote code execution in HPE Networking Instant On firmware through 3.4.1.0 allows an attacker who can r
Authentication controls in the management protocol of HPE Networking Instant On access points (firmware ≤3.4.1.0) can be
Unauthenticated command injection in the CLI of HPE Networking Instant On access points allows an attacker on the same a
Unauthenticated attackers on the same Layer-2/wireless broadcast domain as an HPE Networking Instant On access point can
An authentication bypass in the API endpoint of HPE Networking Instant ON (affected versions 0.0.0.0 through 3.4.1.0) al
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the management API endpoint of HPE Networking Instant ON access points lets an aut
Command injection in HPE Networking Instant ON firmware versions up to and including 3.4.1.0 allows an authenticated rem
Memory corruption reachable through an unvalidated format string in the management API of HPE Networking Instant On acce
Authentication bypass in the captive portal of HPE Networking Instant On (all versions up to and including 3.4.1.0) lets
Local privilege escalation in HPE Networking Instant On firmware 3.4.1.0 and earlier allows an attacker who already hold
Denial of service in HPE Networking Instant On firmware version 3.4.1.0 and earlier lets a remote attacker who already h
EUVD-2026-89349
GHSA-ch2c-mfgg-5cgv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB