Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain or compromise 'power' role account
-
DeliveryCraft malicious ui-tour knowledge object with matching auto-tour page name
-
ExploitShare malicious object at app level
-
ExecutionVictim authenticated user navigates to targeted Splunk Web page
-
PersistSplunk Web resolves tour entry from app namespace using untrusted content
-
ImpactArbitrary JavaScript executes in victim's browser within their session permissions
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must hold the Splunk 'power' built-in role on the target Splunk Enterprise instance - this is a non-default privilege level above standard users and must be explicitly granted by an administrator. The attack requires the ability to create and share knowledge objects at the app level, a capability gated to the 'power' role. A second, separately authenticated Splunk user must visit a standard Splunk Web page that triggers auto-tour resolution for the poisoned page name - the victim's visit is the execution trigger. Exploitation is limited to the authenticated victim's session context: the JavaScript executes with the victim's permissions, not an elevated or system-level context, and scope is unchanged (S:U). The attack does not require any specific non-default Splunk configuration beyond the 'power' role being assigned; any default Splunk Web deployment with auto-tours enabled is susceptible once the precondition of attacker role access is met. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N scores 7.3 (High). The most significant limiting signal is the dual-actor requirement: the attacker must hold the Splunk 'power' role (PR:L) to write the malicious object, AND a second authenticated victim must visit a relevant Splunk Web page (UI:R). This is not an unauthenticated or opportunistic attack - it requires insider access or a compromised 'power' account as a precondition. However, once staged, the attack is passive and persistent: any authenticated user who navigates to the poisoned page will execute the payload without further attacker interaction, and the JavaScript runs under the victim's session permissions (C:H, I:H). There is no EPSS score in the provided data, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept identified. The risk is highest in environments where 'power' role is broadly granted or where Splunk is used by high-privilege users (SOC analysts, incident responders) whose session tokens would be especially valuable. The absence of availability impact (A:N) and the scoped impact (S:U) limit blast radius to the victim's own session context. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a 'power' role account - either a malicious insider or a threat actor who has compromised such an account - crafts a ui-tour knowledge object containing a JavaScript payload, names it to match an existing auto-tour page (such as a default Splunk dashboard page), and shares it at the app level. When a SOC analyst or administrator with higher permissions subsequently visits that Splunk Web page in the course of normal operations, the malicious tour content is resolved from the app namespace and the JavaScript executes silently in their browser, potentially exfiltrating session tokens, search results, or Splunk configuration data within the scope of the victim's permissions. No public proof-of-concept has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Splunk Enterprise allows a 'power' role user to persist a malicious ui-tour knowledge object that executes arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of any authenticated user who visits an affected Splunk Web page. Affected are all Splunk Enterprise deployments running versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, or 9.4.14, a broad multi-branch footprint reported via Cisco and confirmed by Splunk advisory SVD-2026-0801. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 7.3 rating and high confidentiality and integrity impact scores reflect meaningful lateral risk within an enterprise's Splunk deployment.
RemediationAI
The primary fix is to upgrade Splunk Enterprise to a patched release: 10.4.2 for the 10.4 branch, 10.2.6 for the 10.2 branch, 10.0.9 for the 10.0 branch, or 9.4.14 for the 9.4 branch, as confirmed by Splunk advisory SVD-2026-0801 (https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0801). If immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should audit and restrict assignment of the 'power' Splunk role to the minimum set of trusted users, as this role is required for the attack precondition - reducing its assignment surface shrinks the attacker pool. Additionally, reviewing existing ui-tour knowledge objects shared at the app level for suspicious or unexpected content can identify pre-staged payloads. Content Security Policy headers, if configurable in the Splunk Web environment, can reduce the impact of XSS payloads by restricting script execution sources, though this is a defense-in-depth measure and not a substitute for patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Splunk Enterprise's ui-tour knowledge object system allows users to create guided walkthrough tours attached to specific Splunk Web pages via named auto-tour entries. The flaw (CWE-79, Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) arises because Splunk Web resolves auto-tour entries from the app namespace without sanitizing user-supplied tour content before rendering it in the browser. A 'power' role user can craft a knowledge object whose name collides with a legitimate auto-tour page name, share it at the app level, and thereby inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript into the tour rendering pipeline. Affected products are identified via CPE cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_enterprise:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* across the 9.4, 10.0, 10.2, and 10.4 release branches. The root cause is classic stored XSS: untrusted data from the knowledge object store is used verbatim when building tour images rendered client-side.
Know when Splunk gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
PR:L reflects mandatory 'power' role for attack setup; UI:R reflects victim must visit the page; C:H/I:H reflect full session-scoped data exposure and integrity impact; A:N as no availability impact is described.
Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).
CVSS VectorVendor: cisco
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could store a malicious ui-tour knowledge object that matches an auto-tour page name and share the object at the app level. The object can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of another authenticated user who visits a standard Splunk Web page. The JavaScript could expose all relevant data and affect system integrity within the second user permissions. The Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability is possible because Splunk Web resolves auto-tour entries from the app namespace and uses untrusted tour content when building the tour image.
Executive ViewAI
A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Splunk Enterprise (CVE-2026-76325) allows privileged users to inject malicious code that executes in the browsers of any authenticated user viewing affected deployments, creating lateral risk across the organization. While no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, the vulnerability affects multiple versions across all branches, and any compromised 'power' user could compromise all employees using Splunk Web. Vendor patches are available and must be deployed immediately.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe
Unauthenticated arbitrary file write in Splunk Enterprise (below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7) and Splunk Cloud Platform (below 10.
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when
curl < 7.84.0 supports "chained" HTTP compression algorithms, meaning that a serverresponse can be compressed multiple t
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.2.2, 9.1.5, and 9.0.10, a low-privileged user that does not hold the admin or powe
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.0.7 and 9.1.2, Splunk Enterprise does not safely sanitize extensible stylesheet la
In versions of Splunk Enterprise below 9.0.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.14, and Splunk Cloud Platform below version 9.0.2303.100,
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9, 8.1.12, and 9.0.2, an authenticated user can execute arbitrary code through t
When curl < 7.84.0 saves cookies, alt-svc and hsts data to local files, it makes the operation atomic by finalizing the
SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a
A vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0 HSTS check that could be bypassed to trick it to keep using HTTP. Rated high seve
When doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data t
EUVD-2026-63132
GHSA-rfg9-gqjm-mw9x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB