Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged local user
-
ExploitAbuse StateRepository API access-control flaw
-
ImpactExecute code with SYSTEM privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization verification
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated, low-privileged code execution on an affected Windows 11 host (builds: 24H2 <10.0.26100.9711, 25H2 <10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 <10.0.28000.3231, 26H2 <10.0.26300.9711) and to invoke the Windows StateRepository API, whose access controls lack sufficient granularity. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: it is NOT remotely exploitable (AV:L), it cannot be triggered against default configurations from the network, it requires existing authenticated access (PR:L), and SSVC rates it non-automatable - so it functions only as a post-access escalation step, not an initial-access vector. No special non-default feature toggle is named in the description; the flaw appears inherent to the StateRepository API's authorization model. |
| Impact | This is a credible but not emergency-level priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw: the attacker must already have authenticated, low-privileged code execution on the host, but once there, exploitation is low-complexity, needs no user interaction, and yields total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) - consistent with escalation to SYSTEM. These signals align well and reinforce each other: CISA's SSVC decision framework rates Technical Impact as 'total,' matching the C/I/A:H impact. The mitigating signals are strong, however: SSVC marks Exploitation as 'none' (no observed exploitation) and Automatable as 'no' (it cannot be reliably mass-exploited, fitting a local-only EoP that must be chained after initial access). There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC identified, and no EPSS probability was provided in the input, so widespread opportunistic exploitation is currently unlikely. The realistic role of this bug is as a post-compromise escalation link in an attack chain (e.g., after phishing or a browser exploit), not an internet-facing entry point. Note one metadata inconsistency to verify: the input tag labels this an 'Authentication Bypass,' but the CWE-285 (Improper Authorization) mapping and the description ('insufficient granularity of access control... elevate privileges locally') describe a local authorization/privilege-escalation defect, not a network authentication bypass - treat the tag with caution. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a foothold as a standard (low-privileged) user on a Windows 11 host - for example via a phishing payload or a browser/application compromise - invokes the Windows StateRepository API and abuses its insufficiently granular access control to perform actions reserved for higher-privileged accounts, escalating to SYSTEM. No user interaction is required and attack complexity is low, but local authenticated access is a prerequisite. No public exploit identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Windows StateRepository API allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already has code execution on a Windows 11 host to gain SYSTEM-level rights, because the API's access controls lack sufficient granularity to separate callers by privilege. Affected builds are Windows 11 24H2 below 10.0.26100.9711, 25H2 below 10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 below 10.0.28000.3231, and 26H2 below 10.0.26300.9711. The flaw is not remotely reachable (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N) and CISA's SSVC framework rates it non-automatable with exploitation observed as none, so it functions as a post-compromise escalation step rather than an initial-access vector; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the current Microsoft cumulative update for the relevant Windows 11 branch so the build reaches or exceeds 10.0.26100.9711 (24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (26H1), or 10.0.26300.9711 (26H2), which places the host outside the affected ranges; the exact KB number should be confirmed from the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70218, and enterprise fleets should stage the update through their normal ring-based or patch-management workflow. Because exploitation requires the attacker to already hold local, authenticated, low-privileged execution, the highest-value compensating control is denying that foothold: enforce WDAC or AppLocker in enforced mode to block unsigned or user-writable-path executables, apply least privilege so interactive users are not local administrators, and remove unnecessary local administrative group memberships - the trade-off being real application compatibility testing and potential blocking of legitimate line-of-business tools. Additional hardening includes restricting untrusted code via Smart App Control or Windows Defender Application Control where supported, monitoring for suspicious StateRepository-related activity and unexpected SYSTEM-level child processes spawned from medium-integrity parents, and segmenting endpoints so a single escalation does not yield broader domain reach; these are detective or containment measures with no direct effect on the vulnerable code path, unlike installing the vendor update.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 4 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is an improper authorization weakness (CWE-285) in the Windows StateRepository API, the programmatic interface Windows uses to read and write application and system state data that underpins UWP/modern app lifecycle behavior and related OS state bookkeeping. Because the API's authorization checks are not granular enough to distinguish a standard user's calling context from a higher-integrity one, a process running with only low privileges can invoke state operations that should be reserved for privileged callers, and then leverage the resulting write access to elevate to SYSTEM. The assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms the exploitation prerequisites precisely: local access, low complexity, an attacker who already holds authenticated low-privileged execution, no user interaction, and full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected host. CISA's SSVC decision data (Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, Technical Impact: total) reinforces that impact is severe once triggered but that the flaw is not mass-exploitable and is not a viable remote or pre-access route; no non-default configuration toggle is implicated, as the insufficient granularity appears inherent to the API's authorization model.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local authenticated low-privileged user (AV:L/PR:L) abuses the API with no interaction (AC:L/UI:N) to gain SYSTEM, giving total C/I/A impact within the same host (S:U).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Insufficient granularity of access control in Windows StateRepository API allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
Windows 11 endpoints across the organization (24H2, 25H2, 26H1, and 26H2 builds) are affected by a high-severity local privilege-escalation flaw in the StateRepository API that allows an attacker who has already gained a foothold on a machine to elevate to full SYSTEM-level control. Because the flaw requires prior code execution, it is a post-compromise escalation step rather than an entry point, but it materially shortens the path from a single compromised workstation to full endpoint control, credential theft, and lateral movement. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and a vendor patch is available, so the principal exposure is limited to devices still sitting below the fixed build levels.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-99197
GHSA-hgjx-258m-79p3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB