Skip to main content

.NET CVE-2026-70161

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99692 HIGH
Path Traversal (CWE-22)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com
7.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-privileged local access
  2. Delivery
    Plant crafted traversal path/artifact
  3. Exploit
    Induce privileged .NET/VS operation to process it (UI:R)
  4. Execution
    Path resolves outside restricted directory
  5. Impact
    Elevate privileges locally

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires local access as an already-authorized user (PR:L) and user interaction (UI:R) - a higher-privileged user or process must be induced to act on the attacker-influenced path, so this is not remotely triggerable. The attacker must be able to supply or influence a pathname processed by vulnerable .NET components or Visual Studio. Affected and unpatched builds are required: .NET 9.0 (<9.0.319/9.0.122), .NET 10.0 (<10.0.402), .NET 11.0 (<11.0.100-rc.2), Visual Studio 2022 17.14 (<17.14.42), and Visual Studio 2026 18.10 (<18.10.4); updating to the fixed versions removes the condition. Limiting factors: local-only vector, prior authenticated foothold, and the required interaction by a privileged party substantially narrow realistic exploitation to developer/build environments.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority local privilege-escalation issue rather than an urgent, widely-exploitable threat. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 7.3) describes a local attack requiring an already-authorized user (PR:L) and user interaction (UI:R), which materially limits remote mass-exploitation despite the 'total' technical impact (full C/I/A compromise within the unchanged scope). CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a lower urgency: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=total - i.e., high damage potential but no observed exploitation and no automated/wormable path. There is no KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so per precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' EPSS is not provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The signals are internally consistent (local vector + no exploitation + not automatable all point to a developer-workstation/build-time EoP), so this is a genuine but patch-on-normal-cycle issue, not a high-CVSS-but-illusory one. Note the impact fields (C:H/I:H/A:H) are elevated while the vector is local and interaction-gated - verify the realistic blast radius against the vendor advisory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local, already-authenticated attacker on a developer workstation or build server places or manipulates a crafted path/artifact so that a .NET or Visual Studio operation resolves it outside the intended restricted directory; when a higher-privileged user or process is induced to act on it (UI:R), the traversal writes or overwrites files in a privileged location, elevating the attacker's privileges. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Path traversal in .NET (CWE-22) allows an authenticated local attacker to escape an intended restricted directory and elevate privileges on the host, with the same flaw reaching users through the Visual Studio 2022 17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.10 toolchains. Successful exploitation requires a local, already-authenticated foothold (PR:L) plus user interaction (UI:R), meaning a higher-privileged user or process must be induced to act on an attacker-influenced pathname; it is therefore not remotely triggerable, and CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, with total technical impact if it does succeed. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, so this rates as a moderate-priority local privilege-escalation issue rather than an urgent, widely exploitable threat. Vendor patches are available.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patches address this issue: update .NET to 9.0.319 (9.0.122 servicing), 10.0.402, or 11.0.100-rc.2 as applicable, Visual Studio 2022 17.14 to 17.14.42, and Visual Studio 2026 18.10 to 18.10.4 - see the MSRC Update Guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70161 for the exact per-product download links (third-party guidance at https://www.herodevs.com/vulnerability-directory/cve-2026-70161). Because exploitation requires a local authenticated user plus interaction by a privileged party, the highest-value compensating controls are procedural and environmental rather than network-based: restrict local logon and interactive access on build servers and developer workstations to trusted personnel, so that an unprivileged insider cannot plant the attacker-influenced path the privileged build process later consumes; treat untrusted project files, repo content, and package/build inputs as hostile and avoid opening or building them with an account that holds elevated rights (the trade-off is reduced developer convenience and a stricter review burden for build pipelines); and run builds under a low-privilege service account with filesystem ACLs that confine writes to a dedicated build directory, which limits what a successful traversal can reach but can break tooling that expects broader write access. There is no meaningful network-level workaround, since the vector is local (AV:L) and user-interaction dependent (UI:R); disabling or removing the affected .NET SDK/Visual Studio versions is only appropriate where those toolchains are not required. Where EOL .NET lines are in use and a supported patch is unavailable, plan migration to a supported version, as unpatched runtimes cannot be remediated by configuration alone.

Affected VersionsENISA

Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 17.14.0 <17.14.42
Microsoft Visual Studio 2026 version 18.10 18.10.0 <18.10.4
.NET 10.0 10.0.0 <10.0.402
.NET 11.0 11.0.0 <11.0.100-rc.2
.NET 9.0 9.0.0 <9.0.319, 9.0.122

Affected Packages

euvd microsoft_visual_studio_2022_version_17_14 fix: 17.14.42
euvd microsoft_visual_studio_2026_version_18_10 fix: 18.10.4
euvd net_10_0 fix: 10.0.402
euvd net_11_0 fix: 11.0.100-rc.2

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 4 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-22, improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory, in .NET components that consume file or directory paths - the code fails to canonicalize or confine a supplied path before using it, so traversal sequences or absolute paths can resolve outside the intended directory tree. Because the vulnerable code runs inside the .NET runtime/SDK and build tooling, an attacker who can influence a path processed by that tooling - for example a project, restore, build, or package path - can cause the process to read or write files outside its sandbox. The assessed vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms three gating conditions: the attacker must already hold local authorized access, must be able to supply or influence a pathname handled by the vulnerable .NET/Visual Studio components, and must get a privileged user or process to act on that path. Confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are all High if the traversal succeeds, and scope is Unchanged (U), so the impact is confined to the same security authority. CPE/version data ties the flaw to .NET 9.0, .NET 10.0, .NET 11.0 (RC), and the .NET-based Visual Studio installers, which is consistent with a defect in shared path-handling code rather than in Visual Studio itself.

Know when .NET gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.3 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
ENISA EUVD HIGH
vuln.today AI 7.3 HIGH

Local path-traversal EoP by an authorized user needing a privileged party to act on the path, so AV:L/PR:L/UI:R; full local compromise gives C:H/I:H/A:H, scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.3

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') in .NET allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A path-traversal flaw in .NET, reaching users through the Visual Studio 2022 17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.10 toolchains, lets someone who already holds a local account on a machine escalate to higher privileges on that host once a user is induced to act on a crafted path. The practical exposure is therefore concentrated in developer workstations, shared build servers, and CI/CD agents rather than customer-facing systems, but those hosts often hold source code, build credentials, and signing material, making them attractive pivot points. Leadership should treat this as a targeted, moderate-priority local privilege-escalation issue requiring prompt but not emergency patching.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 62% exploitable
Prevalence
High
.NET SDK/runtime and Visual Studio are widely deployed enterprise developer platforms
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5

Attack Technique

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

More in .NET

View all
CVE-2026-87697 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Remote code execution affects Windows desktop applications built on the Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime (WPF) compo

CVE-2023-7334 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 15

Changjetong T+ (through 16.x) has .NET deserialization RCE in an AjaxPro endpoint. Attacker-controlled JSON triggers des

CVE-2026-75513 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Sep 16

SQL injection (CWE-89) in Marten, the .NET transactional document DB and event store for PostgreSQL, affects versions 7.

CVE-2026-100369 HIGH POC
8.4 Sep 25

Argument injection in the CliInvoke .NET process-wrapping library (and its former identity, AlastairLundy.CliInvoke) all

CVE-2019-25359 HIGH POC
8.2 Feb 18

SD.NET RIM versions before 4.7.3c contain a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL st

CVE-2026-25925 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 09

PowerDocu versions prior to 2.4.0 allow arbitrary .NET object instantiation and code execution through unsafe deserializ

CVE-2025-24070 HIGH POC
7.0 Mar 11

Weak authentication in ASP.NET Core &amp; Visual Studio allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a net

CVE-2026-26282 MEDIUM POC
6.6 Feb 19

NanaZip versions 5.0.1252.0 through 6.0.1629.0 contain an out-of-bounds heap read in the .NET Single File bundle parser

CVE-2026-27709 MEDIUM POC
6.6 Feb 26

Out-of-bounds memory read in NanaZip versions 5.0.1252.0 through 6.0.1637.x allows local authenticated attackers to disc

CVE-2020-37103 MEDIUM POC
6.4 Feb 03

DotNetNuke 9.5 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows normal users to upload malicious XML

CVE-2026-3263 MEDIUM POC
6.3 Feb 26

Asp.Net-Core-Inventory-Order-Management-System versions up to 9.20250118. contains a security vulnerability (CVSS 6.3).

CVE-2025-54539 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 16

Remote code execution in the ActiveMQ NMS AMQP .NET client affects all releases up to and including 2.3.0 when the clien

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy