Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Airflow as any team member
-
DeliveryIdentify asset linked to a cross-team DAG
-
ExploitPOST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize with custom conf
-
ExecutionAuth check omits team_name, evaluates global DAG permission
-
PersistCross-team DAG run authorized and triggered
-
ImpactPoll wait_dag_run_until_finished to read cross-team XCom values
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires all of the following: (1) the Airflow deployment must be running in multi-team mode; (2) a team-aware auth manager must be configured - the vulnerability description explicitly names the Keycloak auth manager as an example, and confirms FAB auth manager deployments are entirely unaffected; (3) the attacker must hold a valid authenticated session in Airflow (any team membership suffices); (4) the target DAG must be team-scoped (i.e., have a non-null team_name). If any of these conditions is absent - particularly the team-aware auth manager requirement - the vulnerability cannot be triggered. Exploitation is limited to the two specific API endpoints: POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize and the XCom check within GET /dags/{dag_id}/dagRuns/{dag_run_id}/wait. |
| Impact | Real-world risk is conditional: exploitation requires an authenticated session, a non-default multi-team deployment, and a team-aware auth manager - FAB deployments (the default for most Airflow installations) are completely unaffected. For environments that DO meet these conditions, the practical impact is significant: an attacker with any Airflow account can pivot across team boundaries, trigger arbitrary DAG runs with attacker-controlled conf payloads, and exfiltrate sensitive inter-task data stored in XCom. The CVSS score was not provided by NVD at time of analysis; this assessment independently assigns the vector as AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - high complexity because the exploitation window is limited to the specific multi-team-plus-team-aware-auth configuration. No EPSS score is available. No KEV listing and no public POC have been identified, suggesting exploitation has not yet been observed in the wild. The net priority is elevated for Airflow deployments using Keycloak or similar team-aware auth managers in multi-tenant environments, but negligible for the broader population of FAB-based deployments. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Airflow user on Team A, with no permissions on Team B's DAGs, sends a POST request to /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize where the asset is associated with a Team B DAG, supplying a custom dag_run_id and conf payload. Because the authorization check omits the team_name, the Keycloak auth manager approves the request as if the DAG were global, and the DAG run is triggered under Team B's context with the attacker's conf. The attacker then polls the wait_dag_run_until_finished endpoint to read Team B's XCom output values, exfiltrating inter-task data. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, but the fix diff and advisory provide sufficient implementation detail for a technically capable attacker to reproduce the condition. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 12, 2026
Cross-team DAG authorization bypass in Apache Airflow versions prior to 3.3.1 allows authenticated users in one team to trigger DAG runs and read XCom values belonging to other teams. The asset materialization endpoint (POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize) and the XCom check in wait_dag_run_until_finished both passed DagDetails without resolving the DAG's team_name, causing team-aware auth managers (e.g., Keycloak) to evaluate the permission against the global DAG resource instead of the team-scoped DAG:<team> resource. This is a missing authorization flaw (CWE-862) affecting only deployments running multi-team mode with a team-aware auth manager; FAB auth manager deployments are explicitly unaffected. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Apache Airflow to version 3.3.1 or later, which resolves the DAG's team at both affected authorization sites by calling DagModel.get_team_name() before constructing the DagDetails object. The upstream fix is available at https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70893 and the vendor advisory is at https://lists.apache.org/thread/kfxqqwgojdjdnt6bxg3ord4y41y334fo. If an immediate upgrade is not feasible, a targeted compensating control is to restrict access to the POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize endpoint and the GET /dags/{dag_id}/dagRuns/{dag_run_id}/wait endpoint at the API gateway or reverse-proxy layer for non-administrative roles - this limits lateral movement across teams at the cost of disabling asset materialization functionality for affected users. Alternatively, temporarily disabling multi-team mode eliminates the exploit path entirely but removes team isolation for all users. Neither workaround addresses the underlying authorization flaw; upgrade to 3.3.1 is the only complete remediation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in pypi
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Apache Airflow 3.x introduced a pluggable auth manager interface with optional multi-team mode. Team-aware auth managers such as the Keycloak integration distinguish team-scoped DAGs from global ones by consulting the team_name field of the DagDetails object passed to is_authorized_dag(). When team_name is None (absent), the auth manager evaluates the generic DAG resource permission rather than the team-specific DAG:<team> permission. The affected code paths - the asset materialization route in airflow-core/src/airflow/api_fastapi/core_api/routes/public/assets.py and the XCom wait route in dag_run.py - both constructed DagDetails(id=dag_id) without resolving and supplying the team_name. This omission meant the team-scoped permission gate was never evaluated, silently granting cross-team access. The root cause maps to CWE-862 (Missing Authorization): the authorization check executes, but it checks the wrong resource scope. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:apache_software_foundation:apache_airflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all versions prior to 3.3.1.
Know when Apache Airflow gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network vector (API endpoint), high complexity (requires multi-team mode plus team-aware auth manager), low privilege (any authenticated user), no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (apache).
CVSS VectorVendor: apache
DescriptionCVE.org
Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize) and the XCom result check on wait_dag_run_until_finished authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other authorization site. A team-aware auth manager distinguishes a team-scoped Dag from a global one by that field -- the Keycloak auth manager, for example, checks the DAG resource instead of DAG:<team> -- so the team-scoped permission that should gate the request was never consulted. In a deployment running multi-team mode with a team-aware auth manager, an authenticated user in one team could trigger Dag runs belonging to another team, supplying their own dag_run_id and conf, and could read another team's XCom values. Deployments using the FAB auth manager are unaffected, as it has no multi-team support. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which resolves the Dag's team at both sites.
Blast Radius
ecosystem impact- 12 pypi packages depend on apache-airflow (1 direct, 11 indirect)
Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 3.3.1.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Apache Airflow
View allRemote code execution in Apache Airflow before 3.3.0 lets a DAG author embed a malicious trigger whose attacker-controll
Unsafe deserialization in Apache Airflow 3.3.0's Task SDK allows an authenticated DAG author to cause arbitrary module i
Unsafe deserialization in Apache Airflow 3.0.0 through 3.3.0 allows any DAG author to achieve arbitrary code execution i
Remote code execution in Apache Airflow 3.1.x allows authenticated DAG Authors to execute arbitrary code in the webserve
Command injection in Apache Airflow's BashOperator documentation example allows authenticated attackers to escalate priv
Unsafe XCom templating in Apache Airflow's documented example DAG (`example_xcom.py`) allowed an authenticated UI user w
CVE-2026-30911 is a security vulnerability (CVSS 8.1) that allows any authenticated task instance. High severity vulnera
Authorization bypass in Apache Airflow's Backfill API (all versions prior to 3.3.1) allows any authenticated user holdin
Information disclosure in Apache Airflow 3.0.0 through 3.1.x stems from incomplete secret masking and under-documented w
Apache Airflow 3.0.0 through 3.1.x exposes JWT authentication tokens in application logs, allowing any authenticated UI
CVE-2026-28779 is a security vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) that allows any application co-hosted under the same domain. High
Apache Airflow before 3.2.0 exposes SQL exception stack traces through API responses despite api/expose_stack_traces=fal
EUVD-2026-57268
GHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB