Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with PermissionCreateTeam account
-
DeliveryCraft POST /api/v4/teams with allow_open_invite: true and/or allowed_domains
-
ExploitServer omits PermissionInviteUser check on creation path
-
ExecutionTeam provisioned with unauthorized invite configuration
-
PersistUnintended users discover and join open team
-
ImpactOrganizational access control boundary bypassed
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated Mattermost session with the PermissionCreateTeam permission explicitly granted to the user or role. The exploiting user must not hold PermissionInviteUser on the target team (a user who already holds both permissions is authorized to set these fields and is therefore not exploiting a flaw). The bypass is triggered exclusively through the team creation API endpoint POST /api/v4/teams by including allow_open_invite: true and/or a non-empty allowed_domains value in the request body. The PermissionInviteUser check IS correctly enforced on PATCH and PUT (update) paths for existing teams - the missing check is specific to the creation path only. Exploitation does not expose data, does not affect availability, and does not grant the attacker elevated read or administrative access; the sole impact is unauthorized configuration of team invite settings at creation time. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) accurately characterizes the risk: the vulnerability is network-accessible and low-complexity, but requires authenticated access with a specific permission (PR:L), and impacts only integrity at a low level. There is no confidentiality or availability impact. The CVSS correctly reflects a narrow, bounded privilege escalation within the authorization model rather than a broad compromise. No EPSS data was provided; however, the absence of KEV listing and the requirement for a specific authenticated permission set suggest opportunistic or targeted exploitation is unlikely compared to unauthenticated network vulnerabilities. The real-world risk is context-dependent: in organizations that rely on AllowedDomains or invite-only team controls as a security boundary (e.g., regulated industries, multi-tenant deployments, or environments where team visibility controls enforce data segregation), this flaw could undermine a meaningful access control. In loosely governed deployments where all authenticated users can create teams freely, the practical impact is minimal. No conflicting signals were identified between CVSS vector and description. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Mattermost user who holds PermissionCreateTeam but not PermissionInviteUser crafts a POST request to /api/v4/teams with the body fields allow_open_invite set to true and allowed_domains set to a target domain. Because the server does not invoke the PermissionInviteUser check on the creation path, the API accepts the request and provisions a team with open-invite and domain-restriction settings the user is not authorized to configure. The resulting team is publicly joinable by anyone matching the specified domain, bypassing the organization's intended membership control policy without any server-side rejection. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 12, 2026
Mattermost's team creation API endpoint (POST /api/v4/teams) fails to enforce the PermissionInviteUser authorization check, allowing authenticated users holding only PermissionCreateTeam to configure invite-controlled team settings - including making a team publicly joinable via open invite and restricting membership by allowed domains - that they are explicitly prohibited from setting on existing teams. Affected versions span the 10.11.x, 11.5.x, and 11.6.x release trains up to their respective latest builds. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw has not been listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Mattermost to a version beyond the affected ranges (past 11.6.1, 11.5.4, or 10.11.16 as applicable to the installed release train) per Mattermost advisory MMSA-2026-00655 at https://mattermost.com/security-updates. Exact patched release version numbers are not specified in the available advisory data and should be confirmed directly from the vendor before deployment. As a compensating control pending upgrade, administrators should audit and restrict the PermissionCreateTeam grant to only highly trusted users or dedicated service accounts - this shrinks the population of principals who could exploit the bypass, though it may constrain legitimate team creation workflows. Additionally, administrators should audit all teams created on affected versions to verify that AllowOpenInvite and AllowedDomains settings reflect intended organizational policy, as any team created during the vulnerable window by a user without PermissionInviteUser may have unauthorized invite settings.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 5 packages in go, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Mattermost is a self-hosted and cloud-deployed team collaboration platform with a granular, role-based permission system. The REST API exposes team management via POST /api/v4/teams (creation) and PATCH/PUT endpoints (update). The platform distinguishes PermissionCreateTeam, which governs the ability to instantiate a new team, from PermissionInviteUser, which governs the ability to configure how users may be invited or admitted to a team. The fields AllowOpenInvite (makes a team publicly discoverable and joinable without an explicit invitation) and AllowedDomains (restricts membership to specified email domains) are invite-related settings that should require PermissionInviteUser. The root cause is CWE-862 (Missing Authorization): the PermissionInviteUser check was implemented on the update/patch code path but was entirely omitted from the creation code path. This is a classic authorization inconsistency across alternate execution paths - the same business logic constraint was not uniformly enforced across all API surfaces that mutate the same data. CPE: cpe:2.3:a:mattermost:mattermost:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*.
Know when Mattermost gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Network-accessible API requiring low-privilege authentication (PR:L); integrity-only impact as only invite configuration is affected, with no data exposure or service disruption.
Primary rating from Vendor (Mattermost).
CVSS VectorVendor: Mattermost
DescriptionCVE.org
Mattermost versions 11.6.x <= 11.6.1, 11.5.x <= 11.5.4, 10.11.x <= 10.11.15, 10.11.x <= 10.11.16 Fail to enforce PermissionInviteUser when setting AllowOpenInvite or AllowedDomains during team creation (the check was only applied on update/patch), which allows an authenticated user holding PermissionCreateTeam but not PermissionInviteUser on the resulting team to configure invite-controlled team settings (make the team publicly joinable via open invite and/or constrain membership via allowed domains) that they are not permitted to set on an existing team via POST /api/v4/teams with allow_open_invite: true and/or a non-empty allowed_domains in the request body.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00655
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Mattermost
View allMattermost versions 10.4.x <= 10.4.1, 9.11.x <= 9.11.7, 10.3.x <= 10.3.2, 10.2.x <= 10.2.2 fail to properly validate boa
Denial of service in linkify-it (npm) through v5.0.0 lets remote unauthenticated attackers wedge a rendering worker by s
A denial-of-service vulnerability in Mattermost allows an authenticated user to crash the server via multiple large auto
Mattermost version 7.1.x and earlier fails to sufficiently process a specifically crafted GIF file when it is uploaded w
A remote code execution vulnerability (CVSS 9.9) that allows authenticated users. Critical severity with potential for s
Mattermost versions 10.4.x <= 10.4.1, 9.11.x <= 9.11.7, 10.3.x <= 10.3.2, 10.2.x <= 10.2.2 fail to properly validate inp
Privilege escalation to full administrative control in Mattermost self-hosted server (versions 11.6.0 and earlier in the
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that t
Mattermost versions 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12, 11.0.x <= 11.0.3 fail to properly validat
Mattermost webapp fails to validate route parameters in/<TEAM_NAME>/channels/<CHANNEL_NAME> allowing an attacker to perf
Fleet is an open source osquery manager. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable,
Mattermost versions 10.4.x <= 10.4.1, 9.11.x <= 9.11.7, 10.3.x <= 10.3.2, 10.2.x <= 10.2.2 fail to use prepared statemen
EUVD-2026-36501
GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB