Skip to main content

SonicWall GMS CVE-2026-66154

| EUVDEUVD-2026-56943 HIGH
Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)
2026-08-11 sonicwall GHSA-5h7r-wrwv-5rj5
8.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: sonicwall
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (sonicwall) PRIMARY
8.3 HIGH
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI
8.3 HIGH

Adjacent vector and high complexity reflect the required MitM positioning on the management segment; scope change captures total impact on managed appliances beyond the GMS host.

3.1 AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (sonicwall).

CVSS VectorVendor: sonicwall

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Analysis Generated
Aug 11, 2026 - 23:37 vuln.today
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 20:12 cve.org
HIGH 8.3

DescriptionCVE.org

An insufficient certificate validation in a privileged communication workflow, was identified in a GMS application 9.5.1 (Build 9510.1044) and earlier versions which, under a successful MitM attack and controlled network conditions, could permit unauthorized changes.

AnalysisAI

Insufficient certificate validation in SonicWall Global Management System (GMS) 9.5.1 (Build 9510.1044) and earlier exposes a privileged internal communication workflow to man-in-the-middle interception, enabling an attacker with adjacent network access to present a fraudulent certificate the application accepts without proper verification. Under controlled network conditions allowing a successful MitM position, an unauthenticated attacker (per CVSS PR:N) can read, modify, or inject data into what GMS treats as a trusted management channel, resulting in unauthorized configuration changes that propagate to managed SonicWall infrastructure. No active exploitation has been confirmed (SSVC exploitation: none) and no public exploit is identified at time of analysis, though the S:C scope change elevates potential downstream impact across the full managed appliance fleet.

Technical ContextAI

SonicWall Global Management System (GMS) is an enterprise centralized management and analytics platform for SonicWall firewall and security appliances, identified via CPE cpe:2.3:a:sonicwall:gms:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The root cause is CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation): during a specific privileged internal communication workflow, the application fails to rigorously verify the server certificate presented to it, meaning an attacker who intercepts adjacent-network traffic can substitute a forged certificate that GMS accepts as legitimate. This class of flaw collapses the trust model of a channel the application treats as authenticated and confidential, enabling the Authentication Bypass behavior reflected in the vulnerability tags - the attacker effectively inherits the trust level of the compromised workflow without possessing valid credentials. The flaw is scoped to specific privileged workflows within GMS rather than all application communication.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to upgrade SonicWall GMS to a version beyond 9.5.1 (Build 9510.1044) per SonicWall PSIRT advisory SNWLID-2026-0011, available at https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2026-0011; the advisory should be consulted directly for the specific patched release version, as an exact fix version number is not independently confirmed in currently available intelligence. As a compensating control pending upgrade, administrators should enforce strict network segmentation to ensure the GMS management network is isolated from untrusted hosts, directly reducing an attacker's ability to achieve the adjacent-network MitM position required for exploitation - this does not remediate the certificate validation flaw itself but meaningfully raises the barrier for exploitation. Deploying 802.1X or similar port-based network access control on the management VLAN can further prevent unauthorized devices from intercepting GMS privileged traffic, though this introduces additional operational overhead for device onboarding. Monitoring the management segment for anomalous ARP activity, duplicate MAC addresses, or unexpected certificate subjects in TLS sessions can provide early warning of attempted MitM interception.

Share

CVE-2026-66154 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy