Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain physical access to Fortinet appliance
-
DeliveryAuthenticate with high-privilege credentials
-
ExploitSubmit crafted path traversal payload via local interface
-
ExecutionEscape restricted directory boundary
-
PersistExecute unauthorized code or commands
-
ImpactCorrupt system integrity or disrupt availability
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Physical access to the device (AV:P) is required - remote exploitation over a network is not possible based on the vendor-supplied CVSS vector. Additionally, high-privilege credentials (PR:H) must be held by the attacker, meaning the exploiting party must already be an authenticated administrator or operator-level user on the affected appliance. The specific feature, protocol, or configuration setting through which the path traversal is triggered is not disclosed in available data (the description's attack vector field is a template placeholder). Exploitation is limited by: (1) requirement for physical presence at the device, (2) requirement for high-level credentials, and (3) no confidentiality impact (C:N), meaning data exfiltration is not a direct outcome - integrity and availability of the affected system are the primary impacts. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 5.0 (Medium) reflects the severe access constraints encoded in the vector: AV:P requires the attacker to have physical proximity to the device, and PR:H requires high-level credentials, meaning the attacker must already be a privileged operator. Despite the I:H and A:H impact ratings - which indicate full integrity and availability compromise of the affected system - these prerequisites drastically limit the real-world attacker population. No CISA KEV listing exists, meaning active exploitation has not been confirmed at scale. The temporal indicator E:P confirms a proof-of-concept exploit exists, but the RL:O (Official Fix) indicator shows Fortinet has already released a patch, reducing exposure for patched environments. The EPSS score is not provided in the input data, leaving probabilistic exploitation likelihood unquantifiable from this dataset. The primary real-world risk scenario is an insider threat or a physically-present authorized user abusing path traversal to elevate impact beyond their intended role - not an external remote attacker. CVSS signals and description are consistent: both indicate a physically-local, high-privilege requirement. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A privileged administrator or malicious insider with physical or console access to an affected Fortinet appliance crafts a path traversal payload (e.g., a filename or parameter containing '../' sequences) through a locally-accessible management interface. The application fails to canonicalize or restrict the path, allowing the attacker to reference files or execute commands outside the intended directory. A proof-of-concept for this technique is confirmed by the CVSS temporal indicator E:P, meaning the attack mechanics are likely documented in researcher tooling. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
Path traversal (CWE-22) in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiPAM enables a highly-privileged, physically-present attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands by escaping restricted directory boundaries. The vendor-supplied CVSS vector (AV:P/PR:H) constrains exploitation to scenarios requiring both physical device access and high-level credentials, making opportunistic or remote mass exploitation implausible. A proof-of-concept exists per the CVSS temporal indicator (E:P), and Fortinet has released an official fix per PSIRT advisory FG-IR-26-151; this vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory (FG-IR-26-151) - consult https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-151 for exact fixed versions for each affected product branch, as the specific patched release numbers are not independently confirmed from available input data. The CVSS temporal indicator RL:O confirms an official fix has been released. As a compensating control pending patching, restrict physical access to FortiOS, FortiPAM, and FortiProxy appliances by enforcing datacenter physical security controls (locked racks, access logs) and reducing the number of accounts with high-privilege access to management interfaces - this directly addresses the AV:P/PR:H exploitation prerequisites. Review privileged user accounts on affected appliances and audit console/CLI session logs for anomalous path references. Note that restricting physical access does not eliminate the vulnerability but raises the bar for exploitation to a level most threat actors cannot realistically meet.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory) describes a class of flaw where unsanitized user-supplied path components - such as '../' sequences - allow traversal outside the intended filesystem boundary, potentially enabling reads, writes, or command execution in privileged directories. The affected products span three distinct Fortinet platforms: FortiOS (the core operating system for Fortinet firewalls and NGFW appliances), FortiProxy (secure web gateway/proxy appliance), and FortiPAM (privileged access management solution). CPE strings confirm all three product families under the fortinet vendor namespace. The CVSS vector specifies AV:P (physical access vector), meaning the path traversal is reachable only through a locally-present interface - likely a management console, CLI, or local filesystem operation - rather than via a network-exposed API. The specific attack vector disclosed in the description is a placeholder ('<insert attack vector here>'), meaning the precise delivery mechanism has not been publicly documented in available input data.
Know when Fortios gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:P/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Physical access vector and high privileges are consistent with a local management console path traversal; no confidentiality impact as described.
Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).
CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.8.0, FortiPAM 1.7.0 through 1.7.2, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiProxy 7.4 through 7.4.13, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi
FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0
Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiOS (6.4 through 7.6.3) and FortiSwitchManager (7.0.x/7.2.x) lets an attacker run
Path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM, and FortiSwitchManager allows authenticated admi
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sslvpn login page in Fortinet FortiOS 5.2.x before 5.2.3 allows remote a
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers with knowledge of upstream/do
An Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability [CWE-200] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS
EUVD-2026-43717
GHSA-c97x-2x9j-68c3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB