Skip to main content

Apuslisting CVE-2026-57785

| EUVDEUVD-2026-48182 HIGH
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (CWE-352)
2026-07-23 Patchstack GHSA-2qrw-v6m9-cjjq
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026

Cross-Site Request Forgery in the ApusListing WordPress theme (versions 1.2.63 and earlier) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker forge privileged state-changing requests that a logged-in victim's browser executes, chaining into a broken-authentication condition that can lead to account or session compromise. Reported by Patchstack and rated CVSS 8.8, exploitation requires tricking an authenticated user into visiting attacker-controlled content (UI:R). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

Affected VersionsENISA

ApusListing n/a ≤1.2.63

Affected Packages

euvd apuslisting no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Know when Apuslisting gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ApusListing <= 1.2.63 versions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

ApusListing WordPress theme versions 1.2.63 and earlier contain a critical CSRF vulnerability that enables unauthenticated attackers to hijack authenticated user sessions and compromise accounts. Organizations deploying this theme face direct exposure to account takeover, unauthorized administrative actions, and potential data compromise without immediate remediation.

Recommended Action

Within 24 hours, inventory all WordPress installations using ApusListing versions 1.2.63 or earlier; restrict administrative access and disable the theme if not actively required in production. Over the next 7 days, deploy Web Application Firewall rules to block CSRF attack patterns, review authentication and access logs for exploitation indicators, and enforce anti-CSRF tokens and SameSite cookie policies on affected systems. Within 30 days, monitor Patchstack and WordPress.org for vendor patches; establish expedited deployment procedures for immediate application upon release, or evaluate and migrate to alternative maintained themes if no patch becomes available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Enforce CSRF token validation and SameSite cookie policies (Strict mode preferred); deploy WAF rules filtering cross-origin state-changing requests to administrative functions; implement Content Security Policy headers to restrict unauthorized script execution; require step-up authentication (re-login) for sensitive account or administrative actions; disable or isolate the theme from production where operationally feasible; monitor authentication logs and access patterns for indicators of account compromise or session hijacking.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 96% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy