Snipe-IT CVE-2026-55482
MEDIUM
GHSA-33g4-646g-qwmm
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Integrity rated High because unauthorized cross-tenant asset reassignment is a severe data isolation violation; availability is unimpacted as no data is deleted or service disrupted.
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionGitHub Advisory
Impact
The BulkAssetsController::update() method accepts company_id directly from user input without calling Company::getIdForCurrentUser(), the standard company-scoping function used by every other controller in the codebase. A non-superadmin user can move assets across company boundaries, breaking multi-tenancy isolation.
Patches
Patched in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/d58fda626e8febfeff4cabbc20ba03edfc411e18
AnalysisAI
Multi-tenancy isolation is broken in Snipe-IT versions through 8.4.1, allowing authenticated non-superadmin users to reassign assets across company boundaries via the bulk asset update endpoint. The root cause is that BulkAssetsController::update() accepts company_id directly from HTTP request input without applying the Company::getIdForCurrentUser() scoping guard used by every other controller in the codebase. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Exploitation requires an authenticated Snipe-IT user account; PR:L in the CVSS vector confirms at least low-privilege authentication is necessary. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | The NVD CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) understates the integrity impact for multi-tenant deployments: unauthorized cross-tenant asset reassignment is a significant authorization failure, not merely a low-integrity modification. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An authenticated low-privilege user in Company A sends a POST request to the bulk asset update endpoint with `company_id` set to the identifier of Company B. Because `BulkAssetsController::update()` applies the raw input value without scoping, the selected assets are silently reassigned to Company B's inventory - exfiltrating asset records from Company A and contaminating Company B's data. … |
| Remediation | Vendor-released patch: 8.4.2. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Same technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today