Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach OLE-processing endpoint over network
  2. Delivery
    Deliver crafted OLE compound-document object
  3. Exploit
    Trigger type confusion in OLE (CWE-843)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory and hijack control flow
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on target

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Type safety enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target to process an attacker-crafted OLE object over a network-reachable path (AV:N), such as a client or service that parses OLE/compound-document or structured-storage data; the CVSS marks PR:N and UI:N, meaning no authentication and, as scored, no user interaction. The key LIMITING factor is AC:H (high attack complexity): the attacker must win a specific, not-easily-controlled condition - likely a particular heap/memory layout or timing state in the OLE type-handling code - so reliable exploitation is difficult rather than trivial. All currently supported Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 R2-2025 builds are in scope per the CPE data. Note the input's UI:N conflicts with the typical OLE requirement that a user open or preview crafted content, so defenders should verify the exact trigger path against the Microsoft advisory before assuming zero-interaction exploitation.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.1 High) signals a network-reachable, unauthenticated code-execution flaw with full CIA impact but a mitigating high attack complexity, meaning the attacker must satisfy a non-trivial condition (e.g., a specific heap layout or race) rather than firing a single deterministic request. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here. The vulnerability is NOT listed in CISA KEV and no public POC was provided, so this is a serious but not confirmed-exploited issue: a genuine patch priority given the ubiquitous Windows footprint and RCE potential, but the AC:H and lack of in-the-wild evidence place it a notch below drop-everything zero-day status. One data tension is worth verifying: the CVSS marks UI:N (no user interaction) and PR:N, yet OLE RCE historically depends on a victim opening or previewing crafted content - the vendor advisory should be checked to confirm whether truly no interaction is needed. The 'Authentication Bypass' tag in the source data is not reflected in the CVSS vector and appears to be a generic tag rather than a confirmed characteristic.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious OLE object - for example embedded in a document, delivered over a network share, or served through a client application that parses OLE/structured-storage data - that forces Windows OLE to treat a memory object as an incompatible type. When the target system processes the object, the type confusion corrupts memory and lets the attacker hijack control flow to execute arbitrary code in the affected process context. No public POC was provided in the input, and the high attack complexity means the attacker must reliably achieve the required memory state.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026

Remote code execution in Microsoft Windows OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) allows an unauthorized network attacker to run arbitrary code by triggering a type-confusion condition (CWE-843) in the OLE component. The flaw affects a broad range of client and server SKUs from Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 26H1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 through Server 2025, and carries a CVSS 8.1 (High) rating. No privileges or authentication are required per the CVSS vector, though the high attack complexity (AC:H) means exploitation depends on winning a specific timing or memory-state condition; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not on CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-50686 for your specific Windows/Windows Server build; the input confirms a vendor-released patch is available, so treat the monthly cumulative/security update referenced at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686 as the primary and authoritative fix (exact fixed build numbers are listed there and were not provided in this input, so do not assume a version). Because OLE is exploited via crafted content, interim compensating controls until patching include blocking or stripping risky attachments and embedded-object file types at the mail gateway and web proxy, enabling Office Protected View and disabling automatic OLE object activation / packager objects via Group Policy (trade-off: may break legitimate embedded-document workflows), and using attack-surface-reduction rules plus network segmentation to limit exposure of unpatched servers. These mitigations reduce but do not eliminate risk and can disrupt document interoperability, so patching remains the only complete remedy.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8875
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.9020, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2525 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2525
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23291 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23291, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23291
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9339, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.9020, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5386 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5386
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_33158 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33158, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 29 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) is a core Windows COM-based technology that lets applications embed and link objects (documents, images, structured storage) across processes and file formats; it underpins compound documents, drag-and-drop, and clipboard object transfer used throughout Office, Explorer, and countless third-party apps. The root cause is CWE-843, access of a resource using an incompatible type ('type confusion'): OLE interprets a memory object as one type when it is actually another, so operations valid for the assumed type corrupt memory when applied to the real object. This typically arises when a maliciously crafted OLE object or structured-storage stream declares or is coerced into a type that OLE's marshalling/deserialization logic mishandles, allowing an attacker to control a pointer or vtable and redirect execution. The affected CPE set spans the Windows OLE stack shipped in Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 R2 through 2025.

Know when Windows Server 2016 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CIRCL (temporal) 7.1 HIGH
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-delivered crafted OLE object with no auth (PR:N) but a hard-to-control memory state (AC:H) yielding full code execution (C:H/I:H/A:H).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows OLE allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity vulnerability in Windows OLE affects client and server systems across your infrastructure, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication. This exposes Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server environments to potential data compromise, ransomware, or system takeover. Although no active attacks have been observed and a patch is available, the broad scope of affected systems demands rapid deployment to minimize organizational risk.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 52% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
OLE is a core component of every supported Windows and Windows Server release
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy