Skip to main content

Oracle Siebel CRM CVE-2026-46925

| EUVDEUVD-2026-37241 HIGH
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-06-16 oracle
8.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: oracle
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Gain foothold on adjacent network segment
  2. Delivery
    Enumerate Siebel Cloud Manager service
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted adjacent-network traffic
  4. Install
    Bypass high-complexity preconditions
  5. C2
    Compromise Cloud Manager process
  6. Execute
    Pivot via scope change to integrated products
  7. Impact
    Take over Siebel CRM Cloud Applications

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Attacker must have access to the physical (or layer-2 logical) communication segment attached to the hardware running Siebel CRM Cloud Applications - typically the same VLAN, virtual switch, or broadcast domain as the Siebel Cloud Manager host - and must operate against a supported version between 17.0 and 26.5. Authentication is not required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N), but the high attack complexity (AC:H) indicates exploitation depends on specific timing, configuration, or other conditions outside the attacker's direct control, which materially limits opportunistic abuse. Internet-only attackers without adjacent-segment presence cannot reach this flaw.

Impact

Signals are mixed: CVSS 3.1 is High (8.3) due to full C/I/A impact and scope change, but the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A) and attack complexity is High (AC:H), meaning the attacker must be on the same physical/logical communication segment and overcome non-trivial conditions to succeed. There is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score provided, no SSVC data, and no public POC indicator in the input, so real-world exploitation pressure currently appears low despite the severe impact. The most notable risk amplifier is the scope change to 'additional products,' which means a successful exploit could compromise integrated systems beyond Siebel itself - defenders running Siebel in flat or poorly segmented cloud networks should treat this as a meaningful priority, while those with strict tenant isolation can reasonably schedule it in the normal Oracle CPU patch cycle.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has gained a foothold on a virtual machine, container, or hardware node sharing the same layer-2 communication segment as a Siebel Cloud Manager host crafts adjacent-network traffic targeting the manager, overcoming the high-complexity preconditions to coerce it into a state that yields full control. Because the vulnerability produces a scope change, the attacker then leverages the compromised Cloud Manager to reach and impact additional integrated products such as backend databases, identity services, or other Oracle cloud components colocated on the same trust boundary. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 16, 2026

Adjacent-network takeover of Oracle Siebel CRM Cloud Applications (versions 17.0 through 26.5) is possible via the Siebel Cloud Manager component, where an unauthenticated attacker on the same physical communication segment can fully compromise the application and pivot to other products through a scope change. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.3 with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but high attack complexity. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the fixes from the Oracle June 2026 Siebel Cloud Patch Update at https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cspujun2026.html, which addresses all supported releases in the 17.0-26.5 range. Because the attack vector is adjacent-network, compensating controls until patching is possible include placing the Siebel Cloud Manager management interfaces on a dedicated, access-controlled VLAN or management network, enforcing layer-2 isolation between tenant workloads and management traffic, and blocking unsolicited traffic from untrusted hosts that share the same broadcast domain - be aware that aggressive segmentation can disrupt Siebel administrative tooling and clustered communications, so changes should be staged.

Affected VersionsENISA

Siebel CRM Cloud Applications 17.0 ≤26.5

Affected Packages

euvd siebel_crm_cloud_applications no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the Siebel Cloud Manager subcomponent of Oracle Siebel CRM Cloud Applications, the orchestration layer responsible for provisioning and managing Siebel CRM cloud-hosted instances. The CPE 'cpe:2.3:a:oracle_corporation:siebel_crm_cloud_applications' confirms the affected stack is the SaaS-oriented Siebel CRM platform rather than the on-premises Siebel Server installations. No CWE is assigned, but the CVSS vector (AV:A, S:C) indicates a network-protocol or shared-segment weakness whose exploitation crosses a security boundary, suggesting that the Cloud Manager exposes a service on a layer-2 adjacent interface that, when manipulated, allows control of resources outside its own security scope.

Know when Siebel Crm Cloud Applications gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (oracle) PRIMARY 8.3 HIGH
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.3 HIGH

Adjacent layer-2 access required (AV:A), high complexity preconditions (AC:H), unauthenticated and no user interaction, with scope change enabling full C/I/A compromise of Siebel and integrated products.

3.1 AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (oracle).

CVSS VectorVendor: oracle

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Cloud Applications product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Cloud Manager). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with access to the physical communication segment attached to the hardware where the Siebel CRM Cloud Applications executes to compromise Siebel CRM Cloud Applications. While the vulnerability is in Siebel CRM Cloud Applications, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Cloud Applications. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Oracle Siebel CRM Cloud Applications versions 17.0-26.5 are vulnerable to complete remote compromise and lateral movement to connected systems through the Siebel Cloud Manager component. Attackers with network access to the same physical segment can bypass authentication and gain full control of customer data and system integrity. Organizations running these versions must immediately assess network exposure and implement isolation controls.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict network access to Siebel Cloud Manager component via firewall rules to authorized administrative networks only; (2) Implement network segmentation to isolate affected Siebel instances from general network traffic; (3) Deploy network-based intrusion detection on Siebel network segments to identify exploitation attempts; (4) Maintain comprehensive audit logs of connections and configuration changes; (5) If risk assessment indicates high exposure, consider temporary air-gapping critical Siebel instances until patch validation is complete.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy