CVSS VectorNVD
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionNVD
Summary
An attacker with push access to gittuf's Reference State Log (RSL) can roll back the current policy to any previous policy trusted by the current set of root keys.
Impact
gittuf determines the policy to load by inspecting the RSL. Except for the very first policy (which is automatically trusted given gittuf's TOFU model, or verified against manually specified keys), whenever an RSL entry that points to a new policy is encountered, gittuf validates that this policy is trusted. This is done by checking that the new policy’s root metadata is signed by the required threshold of the current policy's root keys.
Because of this, an attacker with push access to the RSL may create a new entry that references an old policy (that is trusted by the most recent policy's set of root keys), thereby rolling back gittuf's policy to the attacker's chosen state.
Note that the attacker cannot roll back the policy to one that would no longer be trusted by the most recent policy's root keys. As an example, say that Policy A's root keys were for Alice and Bob with a threshold of two, and then Policy B replaced Bob with Carol, with a threshold of two required. An attacker would not be able to roll back the policy to policy A, because it was signed by Alice and Bob, not Alice and Carol.
If you host your repository on a forge such as GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc., and only certain people are allowed to push to the RSL (e.g. only maintainers of your project have push access to the repository, and all other contributions must be done via pull request), then only those users with push access can perform the attack, or the forge itself.
Fix
gittuf version v0.14.0 introduces a monotonically increasing number to all policy metadata (not to be confused with the metadata version, which dictates the features supported by the metadata). This number is incremented whenever a gittuf client of version v0.14.0 or greater updates the metadata or invokes a patch command to add this field.
During policy verification, gittuf compares the monotonically increasing number of the new policy it encounters in the RSL to the current policy. If any file in the policy (e.g. root of trust, primary policy file, or delegated policy file) has this number, gittuf will check that it increases by one any time the respective file is changed.
Resolution
Upgrade gittuf and Apply Metadata Patch
gittuf strongly recommends users upgrade to the latest version to remediate this vulnerability. Specifically, gittuf version v0.14.0 (and above) are patched with respect to this vulnerability. All users who use gittuf to verify the repository or update its policy metadata must upgrade to prevent this attack.
After a consuming application applies the upgrade, a root of trust user or policy administrator must run:
gittuf trust increment-versionor:
gittuf policy increment-versionto add the monotonically increasing number field to the metadata (see [Fix](#fix) above).
Check for Rollback Attack Attempts
Because this attack requires the attacker to add an entry to the RSL, and because gittuf stores the RSL inside the repository, this attack cannot be performed without leaving evidence behind (in this case, the malicious RSL entry). To check for whether this attack was performed on your repository, run:
gittuf rsl log --ref refs/gittuf/policyAll RSL entries that record new policy states for gittuf should be displayed. There should be one RSL entry every time a legitimate, new policy was applied. Should users find an RSL entry which points to an older policy state, their repository has been compromised.
Credits
gittuf thanks Andrew Nesbitt (@andrew) for finding and responsibly disclosing this vulnerability.
AnalysisAI
Policy rollback vulnerability in gittuf versions up to 0.13.1 allows attackers with push access to the Reference State Log (RSL) to downgrade repository policies to previously signed versions, bypassing security controls. An attacker cannot roll back to policies that would be unsigned by the current root keys, but can selectively choose any valid prior policy state. …
Sign in for full analysis, threat intelligence, and remediation guidance.
More from same product – last 7 days
Command injection in Prefect 3.6.18's GitHub integration allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary git commands th
Incorrect authorization enforcement in GitLab CE/EE permits a blocked Project Access Token to continue reading private p
Identity confusion in GitLab EE's Duo AI workflow runners lets an authenticated, low-privileged user cause specific Duo
Denial of service in GitLab CE/EE affects all versions from 17.1 through those prior to 18.10.7, 18.11.4, and 19.0.1, al
Unauthorized private project enumeration in GitLab CE/EE exposes confidential project metadata to unauthenticated networ
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-30348
GHSA-vxvc-cg7j-rwqj