Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionGitHub Advisory
Summary
Bugsink’s webhook URL validation in versions 2.1.2 and earlier could be (partially) bypassed because of a mismatch in URL parsing.
In some malformed URLs, Python’s standard URL parser (urllib) and the HTTP client stack (requests / urllib3) do not agree on which host is actually being targeted. That could allow a webhook URL to pass Bugsink’s outbound-host checks while the actual HTTP request is sent somewhere else.
Impact
This issue affects Bugsink’s outbound webhook integrations.
An attacker who can supply or influence a webhook URL may be able to make Bugsink send an outbound HTTP POST request to a host that should have been blocked by the webhook validation logic, including loopback, private, or otherwise non-allowlisted destinations.
The practical impact is limited:
- this is an outbound webhook SSRF issue, not a general-purpose proxy
- Bugsink does not follow redirects for these webhook requests
- the request shape is constrained by how the malformed URL is normalized by the HTTP client
- this does not give arbitrary control over every possible request path
In other words, this is a real validation bypass, but it is narrower than a full arbitrary-request primitive.
Technical Details
The original validation logic parsed webhook URLs with Python’s urllib.parse.urlparse, then sent the request with requests.post.
For malformed inputs involving backslashes and @, those components can disagree about where the authority ends and which hostname is the real target. A URL may therefore appear to target an allowlisted public hostname during validation, while the HTTP client actually connects to a different host.
Fix
The fix has two parts:
- Bugsink now normalizes webhook URLs using the same HTTP client stack that will later send them, and applies validation to that normalized form.
- Bugsink now outright rejects raw webhook URLs containing characters outside the RFC URL character set, rather than relying on downstream normalization of malformed input.
Together, these changes remove the parser discrepancy and make webhook URL handling stricter and more predictable.
Workarounds
If users cannot upgrade immediately:
- restrict who can configure or modify webhook URLs
- review existing webhook configurations for malformed or unusual URLs
- prefer tightly controlled outbound network policy at the deployment level
AnalysisAI
Bugsink versions 2.1.2 and earlier contain a webhook URL validation bypass (SSRF) where malformed URLs with backslashes and @ symbols pass validation checks but are interpreted differently by Python's urllib parser versus the requests HTTP client, allowing attackers with webhook configuration access to direct outbound POST requests to blocked hosts including loopback and private addresses. The vulnerability is narrower than full SSRF because requests do not follow redirects, the request shape is constrained by URL normalization, and this only affects webhook integrations, not arbitrary outbound proxying.
Technical ContextAI
The vulnerability stems from a parser discrepancy between Python's standard urllib.parse.urlparse (used for validation) and the requests/urllib3 HTTP client library (used for actual requests). When processing malformed URLs containing backslashes and @ symbols in the authority section, these two components disagree on the actual target hostname. The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), specifically a validation-execution mismatch where security checks operate on a different canonical form than the actual HTTP client. The fix normalizes URLs using the same urllib3 parser that requests uses, and rejects non-RFC-3986 characters to eliminate the discrepancy. CPE: pkg:pip/bugsink.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Upgrade Bugsink to version 2.1.3 or later, which hardens webhook URL validation by normalizing URLs using the requests/urllib3 parser before validation and rejecting any webhook URLs containing non-RFC-3986 characters. For organizations unable to patch immediately: restrict administrative access to webhook configuration settings (requires PR:L privilege to exploit), conduct a security review of existing webhook URLs to identify and remove malformed or unusual URLs (especially those containing backslashes, non-ASCII characters, or suspicious @ symbols), and implement strict outbound network policies at the deployment level to deny connections to RFC-1918 private ranges and loopback addresses (127.0.0.0/8, ::1). The network-policy control is the most robust compensating control but requires coordination with network/infrastructure teams and may impact legitimate webhook destinations.
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
Cross-user flow execution in Langflow (< 1.9.1) lets any authenticated API-key holder run another user's flow by passing
Same weakness CWE-918 – Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-31855
GHSA-fp53-qcf8-2xx2