Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify target RT 6.0.x instance
-
DeliveryCraft URL with reflected XSS payload in vulnerable parameter
-
ExploitDeliver URL to authenticated RT user via phishing
-
ExecutionVictim clicks link while logged into RT
-
PersistReflected payload executes in victim browser context
-
ImpactExfiltrate session token or perform privileged RT actions as victim
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The victim must be an authenticated RT user (any privilege level) at the time they visit the crafted URL - the CVSS PR:N indicates the attacker themselves requires no credentials, but UI:R confirms active victim interaction is mandatory. No special RT server configuration, module, or feature flag is required beyond running an unpatched RT 6.0.0-6.0.2 instance; the vulnerability is present in the default installation. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the attacker must successfully deliver the malicious URL and socially engineer the victim into clicking it while authenticated, (2) browser-level mitigations such as Content-Security-Policy headers, if configured by the RT deployment, may partially reduce JavaScript execution scope, and (3) HttpOnly cookie flags on RT session cookies would prevent direct cookie exfiltration via document.cookie, though DOM-based actions as the victim would still be possible. |
| Impact | The NVD CVSS 6.1 (Medium) score is consistent with a reflected XSS carrying a scope change but constrained by required user interaction (UI:R) and limited confidentiality/integrity impacts (C:L/I:L). The most significant risk amplifier is the S:C (scope change), which elevates reflected XSS above typical low-severity web bugs: session hijacking or privilege escalation within RT is plausible if an attacker targets a high-privilege RT user such as an administrator. No CISA KEV listing and no POC availability have been identified in the provided data, which tempers urgency compared to actively exploited XSS flaws. The attack complexity is low (AC:L), meaning no race conditions or specialized knowledge are required beyond crafting a URL - the primary barrier is social engineering an authenticated user. EPSS data was not provided; exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from available signals. Real-world priority is moderate: organizations with externally accessible RT instances or those where RT administrators receive untrusted external communications face elevated risk and should prioritize patching. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker identifies an organization running RT 6.0.x with an internet-facing or intranet-accessible URL, then crafts a URL embedding a JavaScript payload in a vulnerable reflected parameter. The attacker sends this URL to an authenticated RT user - an administrator or privileged agent - via phishing email or social channel; when the victim clicks the link while logged in, the script executes in their browser, exfiltrating their RT session cookie or issuing authenticated API requests to RT (e.g., creating admin accounts, reading sensitive tickets) on the attacker's behalf. No public POC has been identified, but reflected XSS payloads of this class are trivially constructable by any competent attacker. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 20, 2026
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in RT (Request Tracker) 6.0.0 through 6.0.2 allows an unauthenticated network attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser session by inducing that user to visit a crafted URL. The CVSS:3.1 scope-change flag (S:C) confirms the payload crosses from the RT application context into the victim's browser, enabling session token theft or unauthorized RT actions on behalf of the victim. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis; the vendor-released fix is RT 6.0.3, published 2026-05-20.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to RT 6.0.3, released 2026-05-20 and available at https://download.bestpractical.com/pub/rt/release/rt-6.0.3.tar.gz (SHA-256: 117b53e7a46e82ade662050d98920f1255865ca873d6bec80036085b17dd3dc6). The vendor security advisory is at https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/security/advisories/GHSA-7742-fhq7-ggv9 and the release tag is at https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/releases/tag/rt-6.0.3. The vendor explicitly states there are no effective workarounds for this vulnerability; the only vendor-endorsed mitigation is to avoid clicking untrusted RT URLs, which is a user-behavior control rather than a technical one. Separately, RT 6.0.3 users should also apply the out-of-band patch for CVE-2026-41073 (TSV export header injection, inadvertently omitted from 6.0.3) at https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/525547751b76cc422015960bae3056f4e8d4351f.patch, which will be bundled into the forthcoming RT 6.0.4.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
RT (Request Tracker) is an open-source, enterprise-grade issue and ticket tracking system developed by Best Practical Solutions (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:rt:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*). CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) describes the root cause: user-controlled input - in this case, URL parameters - is incorporated into HTTP responses and rendered by the browser without adequate output encoding or sanitization. The 'reflected' variant means the payload is not persisted server-side; it must be delivered via a crafted link in each attack attempt. The CVSS scope change (S:C) is technically significant: it signals that successful exploitation extends impact beyond the RT web application security domain into the victim's browser context, which may include access to session cookies, local storage, and the ability to make authenticated requests to RT on the victim's behalf.
Know when Rt gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Network-delivered reflected XSS requiring victim click (UI:R, PR:N); scope change (S:C) reflects browser context execution; C:L/I:L captures limited session and DOM impact with no server availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
RT is an open source, enterprise-grade issue and ticket tracking system. Versions 6.0.0 and above, prior to 6.0.3 contain a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker who can induce an authenticated RT user to visit a crafted URL can execute arbitrary JavaScript in that user's browser session. There are no effective workarounds. Avoid following untrusted RT URLs. This issue has been fixed in version 6.0.3.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Privilege escalation and information disclosure in Best Practical's Request Tracker (RT) 6.0.0-6.0.2 and versions before
Authenticated SQL injection in Best Practical's Request Tracker (RT) ticketing system affects versions 5.0.0-5.0.9 and 6
Authentication bypass in Best Practical's Request Tracker (RT) versions 5.0.9 and prior, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.2, allows
Cross-site request forgery in Best Practical Request Tracker (RT) versions 6.0.0 through 6.0.2 allows remote attackers t
Request Tracker (RT) 3.8.x before 3.8.17 and 4.0.x before 4.0.13 does not properly restrict access to private callback c
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Request Tracker (RT) 3.8.12 and other versions before 3.8.15, and 4.0
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Best Practical RT versions 5.0.4-5.0.9 and 6.0.0-6.0.2 allows an unauthenticated attac
Request Tracker (RT) 3.8.x before 3.8.17 and 4.0.x before 4.0.13 allows remote authenticated users with the permissions
Request Tracker (RT) 4.x before 4.0.13 does not properly enforce the DeleteTicket and "custom lifecycle transition" perm
Stored XSS in Best Practical RT (versions 5.0.0-5.0.9 and 6.0.0-6.0.2) allows any authenticated user with file upload pe
Stored Cross-Site Scripting in Best Practical RT versions 6.0.0 through 6.0.2 allows an authenticated attacker with writ
Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in Email::Address::List before 0.02, as used in RT 4.2.0 through 4.2.2, allows remo
EUVD-2026-46045
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
VulDB
Exploit-DB