Skip to main content

Best Payments Plugin CVE-2026-42655

| EUVDEUVD-2026-36820 MEDIUM
External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter (CWE-472)
2026-06-15 Patchstack GHSA-g7qv-r436-2gvc
5.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify WordPress site with vulnerable plugin
  2. Delivery
    Initiate checkout/payment flow as anonymous user
  3. Exploit
    Intercept outbound HTTP payment parameters via proxy
  4. Execution
    Modify parameters to assert successful payment status
  5. Persist
    Submit manipulated request to plugin endpoint
  6. Impact
    Plugin records order as paid without payment gateway confirmation

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Server-side parameter enforcement
Exploitation Conditions

The target WordPress site must have Best Payments Plugin for WP version 4.6.19 or earlier installed and active with at least one publicly accessible payment form or checkout flow. CVSS PR:N confirms exploitation requires no authentication - anonymous visitors who can reach the checkout page are potential attackers. CVSS AC:H limits exploitation to individuals with the technical ability to intercept and modify HTTP requests during an active payment session (requiring a tool such as Burp Suite or a browser developer console) and sufficient knowledge of the plugin's parameter naming and expected values. Exploitation is further constrained by the need to actively engage a payment flow rather than passively scanning endpoints. No non-default WordPress configuration is required beyond having the plugin installed and operational; any site running a vulnerable version with an active storefront is at risk during checkout sessions. The limiting factors for defenders to note are: AC:H eliminates script-kiddie mass exploitation; no public exploit reduces immediate threat surface; and C:N/A:N means the flaw cannot be leveraged for data exfiltration or service disruption.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.9 (Medium) with vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N. The network attack vector and absence of privilege requirements (PR:N, confirmed by CVSS) lower the bar for any attacker who can reach the checkout flow, but high attack complexity (AC:H) requires deliberate HTTP parameter manipulation and knowledge of the plugin's payment flow - ruling out trivial automated scanning. Integrity impact is high (I:H), meaning successful exploitation allows free acquisition of goods or services on affected stores; confidentiality and availability are entirely unaffected (C:N/A:N). No EPSS data was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV and no public exploit code has been identified, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. Given AC:H and the absence of public exploit tooling, SSVC automatable signal is low; however, motivated actors manually targeting specific high-value merchants represent a plausible threat. The business risk is meaningful for e-commerce operators but unlikely to manifest as mass-exploitation campaigns. No conflicting data signals are present in the available intelligence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker targeting a WordPress store initiates a legitimate checkout session, then uses an HTTP interception proxy (such as Burp Suite) to capture and modify the payment parameters submitted during the flow - for example, changing a payment status field or amount parameter to indicate a successful transaction before submitting the request. The vulnerable plugin accepts these client-supplied values without re-verifying against a server-side authoritative record or payment gateway callback, records the order as paid, and delivers goods or services without any funds being transferred. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, but the attack requires only standard HTTP interception skills and familiarity with the plugin's parameter structure.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 15, 2026

Payment bypass in Best Payments Plugin for WP (versions ≤ 4.6.19) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to circumvent payment verification by manipulating HTTP parameters the plugin incorrectly treats as immutable, enabling completion of purchases without actual payment. Rooted in CWE-472 (External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter), the flaw directly threatens the financial integrity of any WordPress e-commerce site relying on this plugin for order processing. No public exploit is identified and CVSS AC:H indicates exploitation requires deliberate parameter manipulation during an active payment flow, limiting mass-exploitation risk despite the unauthenticated attack vector.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is independently confirmed from available data; administrators should immediately consult the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-payment-form/vulnerability/wordpress-best-payments-plugin-for-wp-plugin-4-6-19-payment-bypass-vulnerability?_s_id=cve for the latest fix status and upgrade instructions. If a patched version has been released in the WordPress plugin repository, updating to it is the primary remediation. As a compensating control where patching is not immediately possible, temporarily deactivating the plugin eliminates exposure entirely but halts payment processing. Restricting checkout page access to authenticated users only, if the plugin supports such configuration, raises the exploitation bar from PR:N to at least PR:L. Deploying a WAF rule to flag or block anomalous parameter values in payment-related POST requests (e.g., unexpected payment status values not originating from the payment gateway callback endpoint) provides partial mitigation with minimal trade-offs. Server-side re-validation of all payment-state data against authoritative payment gateway records - rather than client-submitted fields - should be treated as a permanent architectural requirement for any replacement or updated plugin version.

Affected VersionsENISA

Best Payments Plugin for WP n/a ≤4.6.19

Affected Packages

euvd best_payments_plugin_for_wp no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-472 (External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter) describes a class of flaw where an application transmits state data to the client - such as hidden form fields, cookies, or query parameters encoding payment status, order amount, or verification tokens - and later trusts that data as authoritative when it is returned without cryptographic validation or server-side re-verification. The Best Payments Plugin for WP by wpmanageninja (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:wpmanageninja:best_payments_plugin_for_wp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) processes payments in WordPress environments and, based on the CWE and CVSS vector, appears to pass payment-state parameters client-side without signing or binding them to a server-authoritative record. When these parameters are submitted back by the client, the plugin accepts them at face value, treating a client-supplied 'payment successful' signal as legitimate. The CVSS AC:H metric confirms that successful exploitation requires understanding the plugin's specific parameter structure and the sequence of the payment flow, distinguishing this from a trivially automatable flaw.

Know when Best Payments Plugin For Wp gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 5.9 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Network-reachable unauthenticated flaw with AC:H for required parameter manipulation knowledge; I:H for payment bypass; C and A remain N as only financial integrity is impacted.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Jun 15, 2026 - 21:22 NVD
HIGH MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Jun 15, 2026 - 21:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 5.9 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated Bypass Vulnerability in Best Payments Plugin for WP <= 4.6.19 versions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy