Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privilege SAP user
-
DeliveryEstablish RFC session to ICM module
-
ExploitCall remote-enabled function without authorization check
-
ExecutionExecute unauthorized table update
-
PersistModify commission or incentive data
-
ImpactTrigger downstream business logic errors
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Attacker must possess valid authenticated credentials for the SAP system (CVSS PR:L). The vulnerable remote-enabled function modules must be accessible via RFC protocol from the attacker's authenticated session. Exploitation is limited to environments where low-privilege users are not restricted from invoking function modules in Incentive and Commission Management (non-default but common in loosely configured SAP landscapes). No special feature enablement, configuration, or user interaction is required beyond normal SAP authentication. |
| Impact | CVSS 4.3 with PR:L (requires low-privilege user) and AV:N (network-accessible) indicates realistic but contained risk. The low score accurately reflects limited scope: integrity-only impact, no confidentiality or availability harm. EPSS score not provided, limiting quantification of real-world exploitation likelihood. No KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation suggests this is not yet weaponized at scale. However, in SAP environments, authorization bypass vulnerabilities in function modules are operationally significant because: (1) authenticated access is often broadly granted to SAP systems, (2) table update operations can corrupt critical business data (commission calculations, incentive records), and (3) the attack requires no special complexity (AC:L). Real risk is MODERATE for organizations with lax user access controls, LOW for those enforcing strict segregation of duties. The lack of confidentiality/availability impact limits this from being a critical priority, but any organization allowing low-privilege users to interact with ICM modules should treat this as timely. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated SAP user with low-privilege access (e.g., junior analyst or contractor account) logs into the SAP system and, either intentionally or via social engineering, invokes a remote-enabled function module in Incentive and Commission Management that performs table updates without proper authorization checks. The user modifies commission records, incentive master data, or calculation parameters, corrupting business data. The attack requires valid credentials and network access to the SAP system but no exploitation complexity. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 12, 2026
Insufficient authorization checks in SAP Incentive and Commission Management allow authenticated users to invoke remote-enabled function modules and perform unauthorized table update operations, compromising data integrity. The vulnerability requires valid user credentials and network access but has limited scope - no confidentiality or availability impact. CVSS 4.3 (low) reflects the authentication requirement and integrity-only impact; no active exploitation or public POC identified at analysis time.
RemediationAI
Apply the security patch released by SAP on the designated security patch day (referenced in https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday and SAP Note 3718508); exact patched version numbers not specified in available data - verify patch details in the SAP advisory. Interim mitigation: restrict user access controls to limit who can invoke remote-enabled function modules in Incentive and Commission Management (audit profiles for RFC authorization object S_RFC); disable unnecessary RFC connectivity to ICM modules if not operationally required; implement segregation of duties to prevent low-privilege users from accessing sensitive table update functions. Trade-offs: restricting RFC access may impact integrated ERP workflows; verify downstream processes before applying. No patch version data was independently confirmed from the references provided - consult SAP directly for exact remediation steps.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
SAP Incentive and Commission Management uses remote-enabled function modules (RFMs) as callable interfaces in the ABAP environment. Remote-enabled functions can be invoked via RFC (Remote Function Call) protocol from authenticated sessions. The vulnerability stems from CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) - the application fails to validate that an authenticated user has explicit permission to call specific function modules or perform table updates through them. This is distinct from authentication (which is present) and represents a privilege escalation or lateral movement risk within authenticated SAP environments. The CPE indicates all versions of the product may be affected.
Know when Sap Incentive And Commission Management gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (sap) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: sap
DescriptionCVE.org
Due to insufficient authorization checks in the SAP Incentive and Commission Management application, authenticated users could invoke a remote-enabled function module to perform table update operations. This vulnerability has a low impact on integrity with no impact on confidentiality and availability of the application.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-29363
GHSA-vxmw-hcjw-h6q2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB