Skip to main content

Rt Theme 18 Extensions CVE-2026-39710

| EUVDEUVD-2026-20417 MEDIUM
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (CWE-352)
2026-04-08 Patchstack GHSA-h4g3-j2wx-7hjc
5.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security Anti-CSRF tokens, SameSite cookies
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

This vulnerability presents a moderate real-world risk despite its low CVSS score and minimal EPSS exploitation probability. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) confirms network-accessible attack surface with low complexity and user interaction requirement; the partial integrity and availability impact (I:L/A:L) reflects limited scope-likely affecting plugin-specific functionality rather than full system compromise. SSVC assessment (Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, Technical Impact: partial) reinforces that exploitation requires manual crafting and user engagement, ruling out large-scale automated attacks. However, CSRF vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins are commonly exploited in targeted attacks against site administrators, and the absence of exploitability does not eliminate motivation for attackers targeting specific installations. The 0.01% EPSS score correctly reflects low likelihood of widespread weaponization but should not be misinterpreted as low severity in a targeted threat model. Organizations running this plugin in sensitive WordPress environments (e.g., multi-author blogs, content management systems) should prioritize patching despite the low EPSS signal.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a webpage embedding a hidden form or image request targeting the vulnerable plugin's administrative action endpoint (e.g., /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with a stmcan RT-Theme function). The attacker tricks a logged-in WordPress administrator into visiting the malicious page (via email, social engineering, or advertisement injection). The browser automatically includes the administrator's authentication cookies, and the hidden request executes unauthorized actions within the plugin's scope-such as modifying theme settings, deleting content, or altering plugin configuration-without the administrator's knowledge or consent. No exploit code is publicly available, and exploitation remains manual and targeted rather than automated or widespread.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Apr 08, 2026

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in stmcan RT-Theme 18 Extensions plugin version 2.5 and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to perform unintended actions on behalf of authenticated users through crafted requests, requiring user interaction. EPSS exploitation probability is minimal at 0.01%, and no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; however, the vulnerability carries real-world risk due to the low technical bar for CSRF attacks and the plugin's web-accessible attack surface.

RemediationAI

Upgrade stmcan RT-Theme 18 Extensions to a version later than 2.5 immediately upon availability. Consult the Patchstack vulnerability advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/rt18-extensions/vulnerability/wordpress-rt-theme-18-extensions-plugin-2-5-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve) for patched release notes and availability timelines. In the interim, if the plugin cannot be immediately updated, implement WordPress security hardening measures: enforce strong administrator passwords, enable two-factor authentication for all administrative accounts, and restrict plugin access to trusted IP addresses via .htaccess or Web Application Firewall rules. Additionally, audit WordPress user roles and remove unnecessary administrator accounts to reduce the attack surface for CSRF exploitation. Monitor WordPress security plugins (e.g., Wordfence) for CSRF-specific threat signatures targeting this plugin.

Affected VersionsENISA

RT-Theme 18 | Extensions 0 ≤2.5

Affected Packages

euvd rt_theme_18_extensions no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

RT-Theme 18 Extensions is a WordPress plugin providing theme extensions and functionality. The vulnerability stems from missing or insufficient CSRF token validation (CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery), a foundational web application security flaw. The plugin fails to verify cryptographic nonces on state-changing requests, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious webpage or email that, when visited by a logged-in WordPress administrator or user, silently executes unauthorized actions within the plugin's scope. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:stmcan:rt-theme_18_|_extensions:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) identifies all versions of the plugin; the vulnerability impacts versions from initial release through version 2.5.

Know when Rt Theme 18 Extensions gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 5.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in stmcan RT-Theme 18 | Extensions rt18-extensions allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RT-Theme 18 | Extensions: from n/a through <= 2.5.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 99% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

27
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +27
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.

Related Vulnerabilities in RT-Theme 18 Extensions CSRF and Data Exposure

View all 2

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy