MantisBT CVE-2026-34390
MEDIUMAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as project manager
-
DeliveryCraft forged access_level parameter exceeding actor's role
-
ExploitSubmit to REST API PUT /project/{id}/users
-
ExecutionBackend writes unenforced administrator role
-
ImpactActor or accomplice holds project-administrator access
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated session with at least manage_project_threshold access (manager role by default) on the target MantisBT project - this is a non-trivial prerequisite. The attack targets the REST API endpoint PUT /project/{id}/users or the web form manage_proj_user_add.php by submitting a forged access_level parameter value exceeding the actor's own project role. No special non-default configuration is required; any default MantisBT deployment with at least one project manager user is affected on versions <= 2.28.1. Exploitation is limited to projects the attacking account already manages - a manager cannot escalate privileges on projects where they have no existing role. The elevated result is project-level administrator only, which does not unlock instance-wide administrative functions (user management, plugin management, custom fields, etc.). |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 score of 5.1 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N) accurately reflects the constrained impact: exploitation requires prior authentication as a project manager, and the resulting privilege gain is scoped to project-level administrator - a role the advisory explicitly notes is 'not very different from manager' in terms of actual capability. EPSS at 0.04% (11th percentile) confirms very low opportunistic exploitation probability, consistent with the high-privilege prerequisite. SSVC flags the issue as automatable with a POC, which is notable: a malicious manager could script bulk privilege escalations across all projects they manage without manual steps. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, indicating no confirmed active exploitation in the wild. The combination of PR:H and limited real-world impact delta (manager vs. project-admin) makes this a medium-low priority for most organizations, though environments with strict project-level RBAC boundaries should treat it as higher priority. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated MantisBT project manager intercepts or crafts a PUT /project/{id}/users REST API request and replaces the access_level field with the project-administrator value, bypassing the UI-enforced restriction. The backend accepts and writes the elevated role without validation, promoting the actor or a chosen accomplice to project administrator on any project the attacker manages. A proof-of-concept for this technique exists per SSVC data, making the attack repeatable and scriptable. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026
Privilege escalation in MantisBT allows authenticated project managers to grant project-level administrator access to any user - including themselves - by submitting a forged access_level value to the ProjectUsersAddCommand handler via manage_proj_user_add.php or the REST API endpoint PUT /project/{id}/users. The frontend form correctly restricts selectable access levels to the actor's own role or below, but the backend command (versions <= 2.28.1) performs no equivalent server-side enforcement, accepting and persisting the elevated value. A proof-of-concept exists per SSVC data; however, real-world impact is bounded to project-scoped privilege elevation and does not confer instance-wide administrative capabilities such as managing users, plugins, or custom fields globally.
RemediationAI
Upgrade MantisBT to version 2.28.2, which contains the server-side access_level validation added in commit 69e0180f180ed5acf48a8d281a73683a7bf32461 (https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/commit/69e0180f180ed5acf48a8d281a73683a7bf32461). The vendor advisory explicitly lists no workarounds. If immediate upgrade is not possible, organizations can reduce risk by auditing the project manager role assignments and restricting which users hold manage_project_threshold access, thereby limiting the pool of accounts that could exploit this path. Additionally, network-level restrictions on the REST API endpoint PUT /project/{id}/users (e.g., WAF rules blocking unexpected access_level values) may reduce automated exploitation risk, though this is not a complete mitigation. The full advisory is at https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/security/advisories/GHSA-frf7-jhp9-jxm6.
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in composer
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
MantisBT is a PHP-based open-source bug-tracking system distributed via Composer (pkg:composer/mantisbt/mantisbt). The flaw is rooted in CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): the ProjectUsersAddCommand class, shared between the web form handler manage_proj_user_add.php and the REST API, trusted the client-supplied access_level field without comparing it against the authenticated actor's own project role. The commit diff (69e0180f) shows the fix adds a single server-side guard - access_get_project_level() compared against the submitted value - confirming that the validation gap was entirely absent in the pre-patch code. The REST API surface (PUT /project/{id}/users) makes the attack scriptable and repeatable without any UI interaction.
Know when PHP gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-accessible via REST API; PR:H because manager-level project authentication is required; S:U and limited C:L/I:L since impact is bounded to project-scope role modification only.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Insufficient access control checks in _ProjectUsersAddCommand_ (used in *manage_proj_user_add.php* and REST API endpoint PUT /project/{id}/users) allows users having *manage_project_threshold* access level (*manager* by default) to grant project-level *administrator* access to any user (including themselves) in any Project they have *manager* rights in.
The normal project-user add form does restrict the selectable access levels to the actor's own project role or below. However, the backend handler still accepts a forged higher access_level value and writes it.
Impact
Privilege escalation.
The consequences of the privilege escalation are not as bad as it may sound, because having *administrator* access at Project level is effectively not very different from being *manager*, it does not actually give administrator privileges on the whole MantisBT instance. In particular, it does not let the upgraded user delete the Project or grant them any access to global administrative functions such as managing Users, Projects, Plugins, Custom Fields, etc.
Patches
- 69e0180f180ed5acf48a8d281a73683a7bf32461
Workarounds
None
Credits
Thanks to the following security researchers for independently discovering and responsibly reporting the issue:
- Dracosec Research Limited (Siu Nam Tang, Chris Chan, Krecendo Hui, William Lam)
- Vishal Shukla
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
In PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.33, 7.2.x below 7.2.24 and 7.3.x below 7.3.11 in certain configurations of FPM setup it
sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c in PHP before 5.3.12 and 5.4.x before 5.4.2, when configured as a CGI script (aka php-cgi), does not
(1) boardData102.php, (2) boardData103.php, (3) boardDataJP.php, (4) boardDataNA.php, and (5) boardDataWW.php in Netgear
The '/common/download_agent_installer.php' script in the Quest KACE System Management Appliance 8.0.318 is accessible by
ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Rated critical severity (C
Roundcube Webmail contains a critical PHP object deserialization vulnerability (CVE-2025-49113, CVSS 9.9) that allows au
Util/PHP/eval-stdin.php in PHPUnit before 4.8.28 and 5.x before 5.6.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP c
Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management web interface contains an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers
Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re
Nagios XI version xi-5.7.5 is affected by OS command injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is re
The get_referers function in /opt/ws/bin/sblistpack in Sophos Web Appliance before 3.7.9.1 and 3.8 before 3.8.1.1 allows
The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
GHSA-frf7-jhp9-jxm6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB