Skip to main content

Apple macOS CVE-2026-28853

| EUVDEUVD-2026-104697 HIGH
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-10-20 apple GHSA-3pjr-9287-h6cc
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: apple
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local unprivileged app execution
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable privileged operation
  3. Exploit
    Bypass improper privilege checks
  4. Execution
    Elevate to higher privileges
  5. Impact
    Full control of host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local code execution as an unprivileged app on the macOS host (AV:L, PR:L), i.e. the ability to run a malicious or compromised application; it is not remotely reachable. No additional user interaction is needed for the escalation (UI:N). Exploitation is limited to macOS versions before Sequoia 15.8 and Tahoe 26.7 - patched systems are not affected, and the flaw cannot be triggered without the prior foothold, making it a post-compromise escalation step rather than an initial-access vector. Apple's description ('An app may be able to elevate privileges') and the fix via 'improved checks' indicate the condition is invoking the privileged operation whose checks were insufficient.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw (CWE-269, Improper Privilege Management): an attacker needs low-level local access (PR:L) and no user interaction, with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the host once exploited. This is consistent with Apple's own terse summary ('An app may be able to elevate privileges') - the attacker already runs code as an unprivileged app and leverages the flaw to gain higher privileges. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV listing, or POC was provided in the input, so there is no signal of active exploitation or weaponization; this is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because exploitation requires prior local code execution (PR:L, AV:L), this is a second-stage/chaining vulnerability rather than a remote entry point, which lowers its standalone urgency relative to a network-facing CRITICAL. That said, privilege escalation on a widely deployed OS is a valuable post-compromise primitive, so it remains a meaningful patch priority, especially for multi-user or managed Mac fleets. No conflicting signals were detected: the local vector matches the 'an app' description. Key missing data: EPSS probability and POC status are absent, so widespread-vs-targeted exploitation cannot be assessed from the input.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A user is tricked into installing or running a malicious or trojanized app on macOS; the app runs with normal user privileges but exploits the improper privilege-management flaw to elevate to a higher privilege level on the system. No separate user interaction is required for the escalation step itself (UI:N), and no public exploit code is known at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 20, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Apple macOS Sequoia before 15.8 and Tahoe before 26.7 allows an app already running on the host to gain elevated privileges, rated CVSS 3.1 7.8 (CWE-269, Improper Privilege Management). Exploitation requires local code execution as an unprivileged app (AV:L, PR:L) and no user interaction; it is not remotely reachable and patched systems are unaffected. No public exploit code or CISA KEV entry was identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to macOS Sequoia 15.8 or macOS Tahoe 26.7, which Apple states fixes the issue via improved checks (advisories https://support.apple.com/en-us/149042 and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149043). Until patched, reduce exposure by preventing execution of untrusted or unsigned applications and enforcing application allowlisting, accepting possible compatibility and administrative overhead; alternatively, run sensitive workloads under lower-privilege accounts and monitor for anomalous privilege transitions, though these controls do not remove the underlying flaw.

Affected VersionsENISA

macOS 0 <15.8
macOS 0 <26.7

Affected Packages

euvd macos fix: 15.8, 26.7

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is an improper privilege management issue (CWE-269) in macOS, where Apple addressed the problem with 'improved checks' in a privileged operation. An app running as a low-privileged local user can invoke that operation and, because the checks were insufficient, obtain elevated privileges; the CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms a local, low-complexity attack requiring prior local execution and no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the host. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* matches macOS releases, and EUVD lists affected ranges as macOS 0 <15.8 and macOS 0 <26.7; no remote vector, public exploit, or KEV entry is indicated.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (apple) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Requires a locally running unprivileged app (AV:L, PR:L) with no user interaction; successful escalation yields full host control, so C/I/A all High.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (apple).

CVSS VectorVendor: apple

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Oct 20, 2026 - 11:22 NVD
7.8 (HIGH)
Patch available
Oct 20, 2026 - 02:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 20, 2026 - 00:50 cve.org
HIGH 7.8
CVE Published
Oct 20, 2026 - 00:50 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to elevate privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Apple macOS Sequoia (prior to 15.8) and macOS Tahoe (prior to 26.7) contain a local privilege-escalation flaw that would let software already running on a Mac elevate itself to administrative control. The exposure is concentrated in our Mac fleet - engineering, design, and executive laptops - where a compromised or malicious application could use this to gain persistence and disable the endpoint protections leadership relies on for data confidentiality. Exploitation requires an attacker to already have a foothold on the device, and no public exploit has been observed, so this is a manageable patching obligation rather than an active incident.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Vendor-released patch: macOS Sequoia 15.8 and macOS Tahoe 26.7

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
High
macOS is a widely deployed desktop OS across enterprise and consumer fleets
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy