Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessInstall or run low-privilege app on device
-
ExploitInvoke flawed permission-check code path
-
ExecutionBypass privilege boundary via logic error
-
ImpactGain elevated privileges (total compromise)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker to already hold low-level privileges on the device - i.e., the ability to run local code such as a pre-installed malicious or compromised app or a local shell (CVSS PR:L, AV:L). From that position, the flaw is triggered automatically by invoking the vulnerable permission-check logic, needing no user interaction (UI:N) and no additional execution privileges. Limiting factors: no remote network vector exists, the attacker must first achieve local low-privilege execution, and the device must run an affected version (Android 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, or 17); note the specific vulnerable component is described only as 'multiple locations,' and the sole reference is the Android Automotive OS bulletin, so general-handset applicability should be confirmed with the vendor. |
| Impact | Signals are largely consistent and point to a genuine but not emergency-grade issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a local, low-complexity privilege escalation requiring pre-existing low-level privileges (e.g., an already-installed app or local shell), with total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) - matching CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) and the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating. However, the exploitation-likelihood signals are low across the board: SSVC reports Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code is referenced. EPSS was not supplied in the input. In short, this is a high-severity-by-impact flaw with currently low real-world exploitation pressure - a solid patch-cycle priority rather than a drop-everything emergency, consistent with how most monthly Android Security Bulletin local EoP bugs behave. One caveat to verify: the sole substantive reference is the Android Automotive OS (AAOS) bulletin, while the CPE is the generic google:android - confirm with the vendor whether this affects general Android handsets, AAOS, or both, as that materially changes the exposed population. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A malicious or compromised low-privilege app already present on an affected Android 14-17 device abuses a logic error in permission checking to bypass intended privilege boundaries and escalate to higher privileges without any user interaction. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires prior local code execution at low privilege. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Android 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, and 17 allows an attacker with low-level local code execution - such as a pre-installed malicious or compromised app - to bypass permission checks and gain elevated privileges without user interaction, rated CVSS 7.8 (AV:L/PR:L/UI:N). The flaw is a logic error in permission management (CWE-269) tracked as CVE-2026-28625; no public exploit or active exploitation is identified at time of analysis. The only vendor reference is the Android Automotive OS security bulletin, so applicability to general Android handsets should be confirmed.
RemediationAI
Apply the Android security patch from the Android Automotive OS security bulletin dated 2026-10-01 at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/aaos/2026/2026-10-01; the bulletin lists fixes for the affected Android versions, but because the exact patch level is not specified in the available data, confirm the appropriate build with the vendor. Until patching, restrict local code execution by limiting app installs to trusted sources, disabling developer options and ADB where not needed, and using enterprise mobility management to control sideloading; these reduce attack surface but do not fix the permission bypass and may hinder legitimate development or user workflows. Since exploitation requires an already-installed malicious app or local shell, strong app vetting and integrity monitoring are compensating controls with operational overhead. No vendor-released patch version is identified in the provided data beyond the vendor advisory.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), specifically a logic error in permission-check code that appears in 'multiple locations' within Android. The vulnerability is local (AV:L) and requires an attacker to already hold low-level execution privileges (PR:L), such as through a malicious or compromised pre-installed app or a local shell; no user interaction (UI:N) is needed to trigger the bypass. Successful exploitation yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) because the attacker can escalate to higher privileges and bypass access controls. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:android:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates the Android platform, while the reference to the Android Automotive OS bulletin (2026-10-01) points to the specific update vehicle for this fix. SSVC indicates exploitation: none, and no EPSS or KEV data is provided.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local privilege escalation from an already-installed low-privilege app, so AV:L and PR:L; low complexity and no user interaction with total impact yield C:H/I:H/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (google_android).
CVSS VectorVendor: google_android
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Executive ViewAI
Google Android 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, and 17-including Android Automotive OS-contain a local privilege-escalation flaw that could let a pre-installed or compromised app bypass permission checks and gain elevated device access without user interaction. This creates organizational risk where mobile or automotive fleets carry sensitive data or control functions, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Leadership should validate affected device exposure, enforce tighter app controls, and plan for patching once Google releases a fix.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include enforcing mobile device management app allowlisting, disabling sideloading, restricting installation of untrusted pre-installed or compromised apps, monitoring for abnormal permission escalation on Android 14, 15, 16, 16-qpr2, 17, and Android Automotive OS, isolating affected devices from high-value networks and sensitive data, and applying Google Play Protect and any available security updates.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-92626
GHSA-m4gw-f8px-7rh3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB