Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessInstall or execute low-privilege app on device
-
DeliveryIdentify exposed privileged system service accepting caller-controlled file paths
-
ExploitSend crafted IPC request to confused deputy service
-
ExecutionPrivileged deputy accesses restricted file using its own elevated credentials
-
PersistRead sensitive data or write attacker-controlled content to protected file
-
ImpactAchieve local privilege escalation
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service Proxy/intermediary controls
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the attacker already has a low-privileged process executing on the target Android device - equivalent to a normally installed application granted standard permissions (PR:L per CVSS). The attacker must be able to invoke the specific vulnerable system service(s) that improperly proxy file operations; these service identities are not enumerated in the available advisory. No network access is required during the exploit itself and no user interaction is needed once the malicious process is running. Limiting factors: the attacker must first achieve application installation or execution via a separate vector (social engineering, a prior vulnerability, or physical device access); SSVC Automatable: no confirms the exploit cannot be delivered at scale over the network; and the specific file paths or service interfaces involved are not disclosed, requiring reverse engineering of the patch to identify precise trigger conditions. |
| Impact | The CVSS 7.8 score with AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N accurately reflects the exploitation prerequisites: the attacker must already have code executing on the device at low-privilege application level, limiting the realistic attack surface to post-installation scenarios. EPSS of 0.11% (2nd percentile) and SSVC Exploitation: none indicate no active exploitation observed at time of analysis, and SSVC Automatable: no confirms that mass network-level exploitation is not feasible given the local-access requirement. Despite SSVC Technical Impact: total and full C:H/I:H/A:H CVSS impact, the real-world urgency is moderate for most environments because an attacker must first obtain app execution on the target device. The 'multiple locations' framing suggests bundled fixes for a broad architectural pattern, which may complicate complete remediation if OEM vendors carry delayed patch integration. No conflicting signals between available data sources - all indicators consistently point to a locally-exploited, non-automated, high-impact but not imminently weaponized vulnerability. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A malicious application already installed on an affected Android 16 or 17 device calls into a vulnerable privileged system service, crafting requests that cause the service to access restricted file paths using its own elevated credentials rather than the application's. The confused deputy writes attacker-controlled data to a protected system file or reads sensitive credential material outside the application's declared permissions, granting the attacker effective privilege escalation. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, but the local-access requirement and absence of user interaction make this viable for targeted attacks following initial device compromise. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 10, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Android 16 and 17 exploits a confused deputy (CWE-441) vulnerability present across multiple system locations, allowing a low-privileged local process to read and write files it is not authorized to access. An attacker with basic application execution on the device can trigger a privileged system intermediary to operate on restricted files using its own elevated credentials, achieving full local privilege escalation without any user interaction. No public exploit exists at time of analysis, and CISA SSVC assessment confirms no observed active exploitation.
RemediationAI
Apply the September 2026 Android Security Bulletin patches distributed by Google and device OEMs through Android's standard monthly security update mechanism; consult the bulletin at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2026/2026-09-01 for the precise patched build identifiers, as an exact fix version was not independently confirmed in the available data (patch is available per vendor advisory). Organizations managing Android fleets should prioritize update deployment through MDM/EMM solutions. As a compensating control prior to patching, enforcing strict application allowlisting and preventing installation of untrusted applications reduces the attack surface, since exploitation requires a local low-privileged process to already be executing on the device; note that this control limits the initial access vector but does not address the underlying file-permission bypass.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-441 (Unintended Proxy or Intermediary) describes the confused deputy problem: a privileged component acts on behalf of a less-privileged caller without adequately verifying whether the caller is actually authorized for the requested operation. Android's multi-process architecture relies on system services running with elevated privileges to mediate resource access for sandboxed applications. When one or more of these services fails to enforce caller-identity checks before performing file operations, a low-privileged application can effectively borrow the service's credentials to read or write files outside its own permission boundary. The advisory language 'multiple locations' indicates this is a systemic pattern across more than one service or code path rather than a single isolated defect. Affected versions are Android 16, Android 16 QPR2, and Android 17 per EUVD-2026-73971; no CPE string is provided in the available data.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local access with low app-level privileges (PR:L) required; confused deputy enables full file read/write yielding C:H/I:H/A:H with no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (android).
CVSS VectorVendor: android
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In multiple locations, there is a possible read/write access to files without the proper permissions due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Executive ViewAI
Android 16 and 17 devices contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability allowing installed applications to access restricted system files. While the technical severity is high, no public exploit or active exploitation has been identified at this time; however, with no vendor patch available, this represents a persistent risk requiring proactive mitigation across your device fleet.
Without an available vendor patch, implement the following interim controls: (1) restrict app installation to Google Play and trusted sources; (2) enforce MDM policies with app allowlisting; (3) disable installation from unknown sources; (4) monitor device logs for unauthorized file access; (5) plan and stage upgrade path to Android 18+ versions; (6) educate users on risks of third-party app installation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-73971
GHSA-h95p-pg4c-vh73
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB