Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconDistribute malicious app via third-party channel
-
DeliveryVictim installs app with user-level permissions
-
ExploitApp crafts malicious Intent targeting privileged component
-
InstallTrigger resolveActivity logic error
-
C2Intent redirected to attacker-controlled component
-
ExecutePrivileges escalated to targeted component level
-
ImpactFull device C/I/A compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must achieve installation of a malicious application on the target Android device; the app requires only standard user-level privileges (PR:L) - no root, device administrator rights, or special permissions are needed prior to exploitation. No non-default configuration or specific hardware state is required beyond the presence of the malicious app and a vulnerable Android version (16, 16-QPR2, or 17). After installation, no further user interaction is needed (UI:N), meaning the exploit can execute autonomously. Exploitation is bounded to the local attack surface (AV:L); the vulnerability cannot be triggered remotely over a network without a pre-existing foothold. Devices running Android versions prior to 16 or patched to the 2026-09-01 SPL or later are not affected by this specific flaw. |
| Impact | The CVSS 7.8 score with vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N accurately characterizes the attack surface: a local malicious application with standard user privileges can exploit the flaw without any post-installation user interaction, achieving full C:H/I:H/A:H impact. The low EPSS score of 0.12% (2nd percentile) reflects very limited observed exploitation activity, which is consistent with the local attack vector constraining mass Internet-based targeting. No CISA KEV listing and no known public POC have been identified, further signaling that exploitation is not currently widespread. Despite the low exploitation signals, the AV:L/AC:L/UI:N combination means the attack is mechanically straightforward once the malicious app is present on a device - any organization managing a mobile device fleet running Android 16 or 17 without enforced minimum security patch levels should prioritize remediation, as the absence of user interaction after installation makes this difficult to detect or prevent at the endpoint layer alone. The S:U scope indicates no cross-device or cross-account amplification, keeping the blast radius contained to the individual device. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker distributes a malicious Android application through a third-party app store, phishing link, or enterprise sideloading channel and convinces a user to install it. Once installed and granted standard user permissions, the app exploits the logic error in resolveActivity to redirect a privileged system Intent to its own component, bypassing Android's inter-component access controls without any further user interaction. This grants the malicious app elevated privileges equivalent to the targeted privileged component, enabling access to sensitive device data, credential stores, or system services. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 10, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Android 16, 16-QPR2, and 17 is possible via Intent Redirection by exploiting a logic error in ActivityStarter.java's resolveActivity method. A locally-installed malicious application with basic user privileges can craft or intercept Intents to gain unauthorized access to protected system components, achieving full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise of the device without requiring any user interaction after installation. EPSS is 0.12% (2nd percentile) and no active exploitation or public POC has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply the Android Security Patch Level (SPL) 2026-09-01 or later as detailed in the Android Security Bulletin at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2026/2026-09-01. Device manufacturers (OEMs) typically distribute these fixes via monthly over-the-air (OTA) updates; fleet administrators should enforce a minimum SPL of 2026-09-01 via Mobile Device Management (MDM) policy on all managed devices running Android 16 or 17. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, disable the installation of applications from unknown sources (the 'Install unknown apps' permission) to limit the initial foothold vector - this does not eliminate risk from apps distributed through managed channels but significantly reduces exposure from opportunistic or social-engineering-based delivery. MDM enrollment with app allowlisting can further constrain which applications may be installed, reducing the attack surface until the patch is applied.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerable code resides in ActivityStarter.java within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) framework, specifically in the resolveActivity method that determines which application component should handle an incoming Intent. Intent Redirection is a well-documented Android attack class where a flaw in the intent resolution logic enables a malicious app to intercept protected inter-component communications or route Intents to privileged destinations not intended by the originating component. CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) identifies the root cause: the protection mechanism responsible for enforcing per-component access controls or validating the resolved target activity contains a logic error that can be bypassed. Affected versions per EUVD-2026-73962 are Android 16, Android 16-QPR2, and Android 17 - all maintained branches of AOSP at the time of disclosure. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms that exploitation is local (requires a malicious application to be installed), requires only basic user-level privileges, imposes no additional complexity, and needs no further user interaction once the app is running.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local attack requiring installed malicious app (AV:L/PR:L); no user interaction after installation (UI:N); full triad impact from successful privilege escalation.
Primary rating from Vendor (android).
CVSS VectorVendor: android
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In resolveActivity of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible way to perform Intent Redirection attacks due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Executive ViewAI
Android 16, 16-QPR2, and 17 devices face a local privilege escalation risk via Intent redirection that could permit an installed malicious app to gain complete device control. With an exceptionally low exploitation likelihood (0.12th percentile) and no known attacks in the wild, the threat is currently contained to organizations where users install applications from untrusted sources.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce MDM policies disabling installation from unknown sources, disable USB debugging and developer mode, restrict sideloading via device configuration, require app stores as sole installation method on managed devices, and monitor application behavior through Mobile Threat Defense tools for suspicious privilege-escalation patterns.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-73962
GHSA-rgmj-ggp9-rhgf
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB