Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization verification
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Impact | The CVSS v3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N) indicates network-accessible attack surface with low complexity, requiring authenticated low-privilege credentials, and no user interaction. The moderate confidentiality and integrity impact reflects data exposure and modification capability without availability impact. The authentication requirement (PR:L) significantly narrows the threat model to insider actors or compromised Editor-level accounts. The CVSS score of 5.4 (medium severity) aligns with this profile: real-world risk depends on organizational deployment patterns and whether Editor role accounts are broadly distributed or tightly controlled. Unlike zero-day authorization bypasses, this is a specific API-level privilege escalation with predictable exploitation mechanics and no reported active exploitation or public POC as of analysis. The low attack complexity and lack of user interaction increase automatable exploitation likelihood. However, the requirement for authenticated access and the limited impact scope (notification redirection only, not full system compromise) place this below critical priority for most organizations, though security-sensitive deployments with strict notification integrity requirements should treat this as high priority. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a compromised or insider Editor-level account authenticates to the Grafana instance and sends a PUT or POST request directly to the provisioning contact points API endpoint with a modified webhook URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server. Because the API fails to validate the alert.notifications.receivers.protected:write permission, the request succeeds, and subsequent alert notifications are sent to the attacker's endpoint instead of the intended recipient. The attacker observes sensitive alert data (system metrics, security events) in real time and can suppress legitimate notifications to the security team, masking incident response activity. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Mar 26, 2026
Grafana OSS provisioning contact points API fails to enforce the alert.notifications.receivers.protected:write permission, allowing users with the Editor role to modify protected webhook URLs and bypass intended authorization controls. This affects Grafana OSS versions 11.6.9 through 11.6.14, 12.1.5 through 12.1.10, 12.2.2 through 12.2.8, and 12.3.1 through 12.3.6. Authenticated Editor-level users can exploit this to reconfigure webhook destinations, potentially redirecting alert notifications to attacker-controlled endpoints. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Grafana OSS to patched versions above the affected ranges: version 11.6.14 or later for the 11.6.x line, version 12.1.10 or later for the 12.1.x line, version 12.2.8 or later for the 12.2.x line, and version 12.3.6 or later for the 12.3.x line. Consult the vendor security advisory at https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-21724 for definitive patched versions and release dates. Until patching is feasible, restrict the Editor role assignment to trusted users only, audit current Editor role membership, and implement network-level access controls limiting provisioning API endpoints to administrative networks. Additionally, review webhook URL configurations in provisioning contact points to detect any unauthorized modifications and consider implementing API request logging to monitor contact point changes for anomalies.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in go
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability resides in Grafana OSS (cpe:2.3:a:grafana:grafana_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) provisioning API layer, which manages contact point configurations for alerting and notification workflows. The root cause is an authorization bypass where the API endpoint responsible for modifying contact points-specifically protected webhook URLs-does not validate the alert.notifications.receivers.protected:write permission before processing requests. This represents a privilege escalation mechanism: the API fails to enforce fine-grained role-based access control (RBAC) rules and instead allows any user with the Editor role (a lower privilege tier) to perform administrative actions reserved for users with explicit notification receiver modification permissions. The vulnerability does not involve cryptographic failure or input validation flaws, but rather a control flow defect where permission checks are either absent or conditionally applied.
Know when Grafana gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability has been discovered in Grafana OSS where an authorization bypass in the provisioning contact points API allows users with Editor role to modify protected webhook URLs without the required alert.notifications.receivers.protected:write permission.
Executive ViewAI
Organizations using A vulnerability should be aware of moderate risk from CVE-2026-21724 rated CVSS 5.4. Exploitation could compromise the security of affected deployments. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and monitor for exploitation.
Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: restrict network access and enable monitoring.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Related Vulnerabilities in libssh Configuration and Protocol Flaws
View all 5The SQL Expressions experimental feature of Grafana allows for the evaluation of `duckdb` queries containing user input.
The `Release PR Merged` workflow in the github repo taosdata/grafanaplugin is subject to a command injection vulnerabili
An issue was discovered in Grafana through 7.3.4, when integrated with Zabbix. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this
A signature verification vulnerability exists in crewjam/saml. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is
Grafana 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x before 4.6.4 and 5.x before 5.2.3 allows authentication bypass because an attacker can generat
Authentication bypass in Grafana OnCall through 1.16.11 lets unauthenticated remote attackers mint a valid PluginAuthTok
Insertion of sensitive information in the centralized (Grafana) logging system in ProLion CryptoSpike 3.0.15P2 allows re
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Grafana caused by combining a client path traversal and open redire
The avatar feature in Grafana 3.0.1 through 7.0.1 has an SSRF Incorrect Access Control issue. Rated high severity (CVSS
Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability
Grafana 8.4.3 allows unauthenticated access via (for example) a /dashboard/snapshot/*?orgId=0 URI. Rated high severity (
Grafana 8.4.3 allows reading files via (for example) a /dashboard/snapshot/%7B%7Bconstructor.constructor'/.. Rated high
Same weakness CWE-285 – Improper Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Medium| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| SUSE Manager Client Tools 15 | Fixed |
| SUSE Manager Client Tools for SLE 15 | Fixed |
| SUSE Multi-Linux Manager Client Tools for SLE 15 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP4 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | Fixed |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Fixed |
| SUSE Multi Linux Manager Tools SLE-15 | Fixed |
EUVD-2026-16338
GHSA-7g92-g4vh-hp84
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB