Skip to main content

CCure 9000 CVE-2026-21653

| EUVDEUVD-2026-48425 HIGH
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-07-23 jci GHSA-v48g-g9wj-ffhr
7.2
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: jci
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with high-privilege account
  2. Delivery
    Reach server-side request feature
  3. Exploit
    Submit crafted internal/external URL
  4. Execution
    Server issues forged request
  5. Impact
    Access internal systems and exfiltrate data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated high-privilege account on the CCure 9000 or victor application server (CVSS PR:H) plus a specific attack requirement (AT:P) that is not detailed in the description - verify the exact triggering condition against the vendor advisory. The attacker must be able to reach the application server over the network (AV:N) and supply an attacker-controlled destination to a server-side request feature. Limiting factors: the need for high privileges sharply narrows the realistic attacker set to insiders or those who have already compromised a privileged credential, and the AT:P condition means default or arbitrary deployments may not be exploitable without that specific state; no user interaction is required (UI:N).

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score is 7.2 (High) with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L, meaning the attack is network-reachable and low-complexity but requires high privileges (PR:H) and a specific attack requirement/condition (AT:P) to succeed. There is no EPSS score provided, no POC referenced, and no CISA KEV listing, so real-world exploitation appears unproven and gated behind existing privileged access - this lowers practical urgency relative to the raw High score. The most significant risk driver is the scope/subsequent-system impact (SC:H/SI:H): an SSRF from a physical-security management server can breach network segmentation. Net assessment: a genuine but conditional risk best treated as an internal-threat / lateral-movement concern rather than a mass-exploitation emergency, given PR:H and AT:P. Note the AT:P attack requirement is not detailed in the description - verify the exact triggering condition with the vendor advisory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds a high-privileged operator or administrative account on the CCure 9000 / victor application server (or who has compromised such an account) submits a crafted request whose target address the server then contacts on the attacker's behalf. The server issues requests to internal systems the attacker cannot reach directly - internal APIs, databases, or metadata services - enabling reconnaissance and data disclosure across network segments. No public POC is referenced, and the AT:P attack requirement means a specific configuration or condition must also be met.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026

Server-Side Request Forgery in Johnson Controls CCure 9000 and the victor application server (versions 2.9 through 3.0) allows a high-privileged authenticated attacker to coerce the server into issuing crafted requests to internal or external systems. Exploitation can expose internal network resources and pivot into otherwise unreachable back-end services, with high confidentiality impact and a scope change that affects downstream systems. This is a vendor-reported (jci) issue with no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing.

RemediationAI

No exact fixed version is provided in the available data, so consult the Johnson Controls Trust Center advisory (https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories) for the specific patched release covering CCure 9000 and victor application server and upgrade beyond the affected 2.9-3.0 range; patch status: patch available per vendor advisory, with no independently confirmed fix version. As compensating controls until patching, restrict network access to the application server management interface to a dedicated administrative VLAN and trusted operator hosts only, apply strict egress filtering / an allow-list so the server can only reach the specific internal systems it legitimately needs (blocking SSRF pivots to arbitrary internal addresses and cloud metadata endpoints), and tightly limit and audit the high-privilege accounts required to reach the vulnerable function since exploitation needs PR:H. The trade-off of aggressive egress filtering is potential disruption to legitimate integrations (video servers, directory services, controllers), so validate the allow-list against documented dependencies before enforcing.

Affected VersionsENISA

CCure 9000 and victor application server 2.9 ≤3.0

Affected Packages

euvd ccure_9000_and_victor_application_server no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CCure 9000 is Johnson Controls' enterprise physical access control and security management platform, and the victor application server is the companion video/event management application server. The flaw is a Server-Side Request Forgery weakness (CWE-918 class, though the input lists CWE as N/A) in which the application server takes an attacker-influenced URL or address and performs a request to it without sufficient validation of the destination. Because these servers typically sit inside a trusted management network with connectivity to controllers, databases, and other appliances, an SSRF primitive lets the server act as a proxy into that trusted zone. The CVSS 4.0 subsequent-system metrics (SC:H/SI:H) reflect that the coerced requests reach systems beyond the vulnerable application itself.

Know when Ccure 9000 And Victor Application Server gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (jci) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Network-reachable SSRF needing high privileges (PR:H) and a specific condition (AC:H mapping the 4.0 AT:P), with scope change (S:C) since forged requests hit other systems; high confidentiality, limited integrity/availability.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (jci).

CVSS VectorVendor: jci

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Victor SSRF vulnerability in Johnson Controls CCure 9000 and victor application server allows Server Side Request Forgery.

This issue affects CCure 9000 and victor application server: from 2.9 through 3.0.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Johnson Controls CCure 9000 and victor application server versions 2.9-3.0 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability that enables attackers to coerce these servers into issuing requests to internal network resources, potentially exposing sensitive infrastructure and enabling lateral movement into backend systems. With no vendor patch currently available and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, organizations using affected versions face direct risk to the integrity of physical security infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Network segmentation to restrict outbound connections from affected servers to only necessary destinations; egress filtering and deep packet inspection to detect and block internal resource targeting; enhanced logging of administrative access and server activities; limiting access to administrative functions; disabling SSRF-vulnerable features where available per vendor documentation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise physical access control platform, common in large facilities but not ubiquitous
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA (public domain), CISA Vulnrichment

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy