Skip to main content

BlogVault Backup CVE-2026-19718

| EUVDEUVD-2026-66276 HIGH
Improper Authentication (CWE-287)
2026-08-26 WPScan GHSA-63pv-w3j7-r654
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: WPScan
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Fingerprint target WordPress site running vulnerable plugin
  2. Delivery
    Send unauthenticated requests to leak binding-secret derived data
  3. Exploit
    Reverse weak PRNG to reconstruct original site secret
  4. Execution
    Authenticate to remote management service using recovered secret
  5. Impact
    Achieve full WordPress administrative control

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Authentication mechanism validation
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Defense Evasion, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target WordPress site has at least one of the three affected plugins (BlogVault Backup & Staging, MalCare WordPress Security Plugin, or WP Remote WordPress Plugin) installed, activated, and running a version between 5.16 and 6.64 inclusive. No authentication is required and no victim interaction is needed - the unauthenticated data-leakage endpoint is accessible to any network client that can reach the WordPress installation, which for internet-facing sites means any internet user. The key limiting factor reflected in AC:H is operational: the attacker must observe enough derived-secret responses from the specific target site to reconstruct the secret via PRNG reversal, meaning exploitation is site-specific and requires a targeted collection phase rather than a single-packet trigger. Sites that have never installed these plugins are entirely unaffected. Sites running version 6.65 or later have the PRNG and leakage issues resolved and are not vulnerable.

Impact

The CVSS 8.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately captures the dual nature of the risk: the attack is network-reachable with no authentication or user interaction required, but AC:H correctly reflects that exploitation is not trivial - the attacker must collect sufficient derived-secret data from the target and then invest computational effort to reverse the weak PRNG, making this a targeted rather than spray-and-pray attack. The EPSS score of 0.17% (6th percentile) is notably low despite the public POC, consistent with this complexity barrier; mass automated exploitation has not materialized as of analysis time. No CISA KEV listing exists, confirming no authoritative source has observed active in-the-wild exploitation. That said, the public exploit code lowers the skill threshold for targeted attacks, and the full C:H/I:H/A:H impact - resulting in complete administrative control - means the business consequence of a successful hit is severe; even a mid-sized municipal IT team in mielec managing dozens of client WordPress sites through these plugins should treat this as an urgent patch, since the per-site exploitation effort is non-zero but the payout per site is total. No conflicting signals are present: CVSS, EPSS, and KEV status are mutually consistent in indicating real but non-trivial targeted risk.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker identifies an internet-facing WordPress site running a vulnerable version of BlogVault Backup & Staging by fingerprinting plugin files or HTTP response headers. Using the publicly available proof-of-concept, the attacker sends a series of unauthenticated HTTP requests that elicit responses containing data derived from the site's remote management binding secret, then applies the documented weak PRNG reversal algorithm to recover the original secret and authenticates to the remote management service with full administrative privileges, gaining the ability to install backdoors, exfiltrate content, or redirect the site.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 26, 2026

Remote unauthenticated administrative compromise is possible across three WordPress plugins - BlogVault Backup & Staging, MalCare WordPress Security Plugin, and WP Remote WordPress Plugin - in versions 5.16 through 6.64, due to the combination of a weak pseudo-random number generator used to create site-binding secrets and unauthenticated endpoints leaking data derived from those secrets. An attacker who can observe the leaked derived values can reverse the weak PRNG to reconstruct the original secret, then authenticate to the remote management service with administrative privileges and achieve full site takeover. A publicly available proof-of-concept exists; no CISA KEV listing is present, and EPSS sits at 0.17%, indicating limited observed mass exploitation despite the public exploit.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to update all three plugins to version 6.65 or later, which addresses both the weak PRNG used during secret generation and the unauthenticated data leakage. Updates are available through the WordPress plugin repository and can be applied via the WordPress dashboard or WP-CLI. After updating, administrators should consider regenerating the site binding secret if the plugin interface exposes that option, since secrets generated prior to 6.65 may have been recoverable. Where immediate patching is not feasible, temporarily deactivating the affected plugins will eliminate the vulnerable attack surface entirely, though this will suspend remote backup scheduling and security monitoring services for the duration - weigh that operational trade-off against exposure window. Web application firewall rules blocking unauthenticated requests to the specific plugin endpoints that leak derived-secret data may provide partial mitigation but should not substitute for patching. The WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/68892d43-912d-421f-9376-8dc6e2e906bc/ provides additional remediation context.

Affected VersionsENISA

MalCare WordPress Security Plugin 5.16 <6.65
The WP Remote WordPress Plugin 5.16 <6.65
BlogVault Backup & Staging 5.16 <6.65

Affected Packages

euvd blogvault_backup_staging fix: 6.65
euvd malcare_wordpress_security_plugin fix: 6.65
euvd the_wp_remote_wordpress_plugin fix: 6.65

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

All three plugins share a common architecture in which a WordPress site is cryptographically bound to the BlogVault/MalCare/WP Remote remote management platform via a shared secret key. Two independent design weaknesses combine to create the vulnerability: first, the secret is generated using a cryptographically inadequate PRNG, reducing the effective entropy of the keyspace and making the secret predictable given sufficient observable state; second, unauthenticated HTTP endpoints return responses that include data mathematically derived from the secret, providing an attacker with an oracle from which to reconstruct it. The root cause is CWE-287 (Improper Authentication) - the authentication mechanism protecting the remote management binding is defeatable because the secret can be recovered from public information. Affected CPEs include cpe:2.3:a:unknown:blogvault_backup_&_staging:*, cpe:2.3:a:unknown:malcare_wordpress_security_plugin:*, and cpe:2.3:a:unknown:the_wp_remote_wordpress_plugin:*, all prior to version 6.65. The vulnerability was reported by WPScan and catalogued as EUVD-2026-66276.

Know when Malcare Wordpress Security Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (WPScan) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable with no authentication, but AC:H reflects multi-step PRNG reversal; full C/I/A warranted by resulting unrestricted administrative compromise.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).

CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Aug 26, 2026 - 15:52 NVD
8.1 (HIGH)
Patch available
Aug 26, 2026 - 08:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 26, 2026 - 06:00 cve.org
HIGH 8.1
CVE Published
Aug 26, 2026 - 06:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

The BlogVault Backup & Staging WordPress plugin before 6.65, MalCare WordPress Security Plugin WordPress plugin before 6.65, The WP Remote WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 6.65 do not prevent unauthenticated users from obtaining data derived from the secret that binds a site to its remote management service, and generate that secret with a weak pseudo-random number generator, allowing attackers to recover it and gain administrative access to the site.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Three WordPress security and backup plugins (BlogVault, MalCare, WP Remote) in versions 5.16-6.64 allow unauthenticated remote administrative takeover. Publicly available exploit code exists for this vulnerability, and affected organizations risk complete site compromise and data theft. Current observed exploitation remains limited.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 94% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular WordPress backup and security plugins, not universally deployed
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

60
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy