Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain valid low-privilege NanoClaw credentials
-
DeliverySend crafted agent creation request to API
-
ExploitTrigger improper privilege check in handleCreateAgent
-
ExecutionSpawn child agent with unauthorized elevated permissions
-
ImpactExecute privileged platform actions beyond authorization scope
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid NanoClaw account with at least low-privilege access (PR:L per CVSS 4.0 vector) - unauthenticated external attackers cannot exploit this directly. The vulnerability is specifically triggered through the Child-Agent Creation workflow via the |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 base score of 5.3 with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L reflects moderate, bounded impact - confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are each low and confined to the vulnerable system (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). The E:P (Proof of Concept) exploit maturity modifier confirms a public POC is incorporated into the vector and lowers the barrier to exploitation. This is not a KEV-listed vulnerability, meaning CISA has not confirmed active in-the-wild exploitation at time of analysis. EPSS data was not provided in available intelligence, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The key risk driver is the combination of: a public POC, no vendor patch, low complexity, and no user interaction required. However, PR:L bounds opportunistic mass exploitation - an attacker must first possess valid credentials. For organizations running NanoClaw, this represents a meaningful lateral privilege escalation risk from insider threats or compromised low-privilege accounts, rather than a perimeter-breach vector. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a valid low-privilege NanoClaw account sends a crafted HTTP request to the agent-to-agent creation endpoint, manipulating parameters processed by |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 06, 2026
Improper privilege management in NanoClaw (versions up to 2.0.64) allows authenticated remote attackers to abuse the handleCreateAgent function within the agent-to-agent creation module to escalate privileges beyond their authorization level. A public proof-of-concept exploit is available via a GitHub issue report, and the vendor has not responded to the coordinated disclosure, leaving deployments unpatched. No public exploit identified as actively exploited in CISA KEV, but the public POC and absence of a vendor patch materially elevate near-term exploitation risk.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - the nanocoai project had not responded to the coordinated disclosure as of the report date. Monitor the NanoClaw GitHub repository (https://github.com/nanocoai/nanoclaw/) and VulDB entry (https://vuldb.com/vuln/386386) for patch releases. As a compensating control, restrict access to the agent-to-agent creation API endpoints (those routed through handleCreateAgent in src/modules/agent-to-agent/create-agent.ts) to only the highest-privilege roles or service accounts, accepting the trade-off that lower-privileged users will lose the ability to create child agents. If network segmentation is feasible, limit the NanoClaw API surface to trusted internal networks or VPN-authenticated clients only, reducing the effective attack population despite PR:L not requiring full admin access. Organizations with high-sensitivity deployments should evaluate temporarily disabling the Child-Agent Creation feature entirely until an official fix is released.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
NanoClaw (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:nanocoai:nanoclaw:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is an AI agent orchestration platform developed by nanocoai that implements agent-to-agent (A2A) workflows. The vulnerability resides specifically in the handleCreateAgent function within src/modules/agent-to-agent/create-agent.ts, the component responsible for spawning child agents. CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) identifies the root cause as a failure to correctly enforce authorization boundaries during child agent instantiation - the function likely does not validate whether the calling user or agent is permitted to grant specific permission levels to newly created child agents, enabling privilege inheritance or direct privilege assignment beyond what the caller is entitled to. The CVSS 4.0 vector confirms the attack is network-delivered (AV:N), requires low complexity (AC:L), no specific attack prerequisites (AT:N), and only low existing privileges (PR:L).
Know when Nanoclaw gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Network-reachable with low privilege required; scope unchanged and all CIA impacts are partial, consistent with bounded privilege escalation within the platform.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability was detected in nanocoai NanoClaw up to 2.0.64. Affected is the function handleCreateAgent of the file src/modules/agent-to-agent/create-agent.ts of the component Child-Agent Creation. Performing a manipulation results in improper privilege management. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Path traversal in NanoClaw's container filesystem boundary allows compromised containers or prompt-injected agents to es
Privilege escalation in NanoClaw before 2.1.17 lets remote attackers with a valid questionId approve or reject privilege
Symlink following in NanoClaw's agent-to-agent file forwarding exposes arbitrary host-readable files to container-contro
Privilege escalation in NanoClaw before 2.1.17 allows confined agent containers to bypass their architectural confinemen
Link-following (symlink) handling in NanoClaw's agent-to-agent attachment forwarding lets an authenticated, low-privileg
Improper authorization in nanocoai NanoClaw's add_mcp_server endpoint allows authenticated attackers with low privileges
Improper authorization in NanoClaw's MCP Server Approval component allows local attackers to bypass security controls by
Privilege escalation in NanoClaw before 2.1.0 lets scoped admins cross agent-group authorization boundaries by submittin
EUVD-2026-53717
GHSA-grxx-9qr2-2q6v
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB