Skip to main content

NanoClaw CVE-2026-19005

| EUVDEUVD-2026-53717 LOW
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-08-06 VulDB GHSA-grxx-9qr2-2q6v
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid low-privilege NanoClaw credentials
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted agent creation request to API
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper privilege check in handleCreateAgent
  4. Execution
    Spawn child agent with unauthorized elevated permissions
  5. Impact
    Execute privileged platform actions beyond authorization scope

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid NanoClaw account with at least low-privilege access (PR:L per CVSS 4.0 vector) - unauthenticated external attackers cannot exploit this directly. The vulnerability is specifically triggered through the Child-Agent Creation workflow via the handleCreateAgent function; the attacker must be able to invoke this endpoint. No victim interaction is required (UI:N), and the attack is conducted remotely over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no specific attack preconditions (AT:N). Exploitation is bounded by the absence of a scope change (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N), meaning the attacker's elevated impact is confined to the NanoClaw system itself and does not directly enable lateral movement to other infrastructure. The primary limiting factor is the authentication requirement - attackers must first obtain or possess valid platform credentials before exploiting the privilege escalation.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score of 5.3 with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L reflects moderate, bounded impact - confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are each low and confined to the vulnerable system (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). The E:P (Proof of Concept) exploit maturity modifier confirms a public POC is incorporated into the vector and lowers the barrier to exploitation. This is not a KEV-listed vulnerability, meaning CISA has not confirmed active in-the-wild exploitation at time of analysis. EPSS data was not provided in available intelligence, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The key risk driver is the combination of: a public POC, no vendor patch, low complexity, and no user interaction required. However, PR:L bounds opportunistic mass exploitation - an attacker must first possess valid credentials. For organizations running NanoClaw, this represents a meaningful lateral privilege escalation risk from insider threats or compromised low-privilege accounts, rather than a perimeter-breach vector.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a valid low-privilege NanoClaw account sends a crafted HTTP request to the agent-to-agent creation endpoint, manipulating parameters processed by handleCreateAgent to assign elevated permissions to a newly created child agent beyond what the caller is authorized to grant. A public POC exists at GitHub issue #2807, providing a concrete template for exploitation. The attacker's spawned child agent can then perform privileged actions within the NanoClaw platform on behalf of the attacker, effectively escalating their operational capabilities.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 06, 2026

Improper privilege management in NanoClaw (versions up to 2.0.64) allows authenticated remote attackers to abuse the handleCreateAgent function within the agent-to-agent creation module to escalate privileges beyond their authorization level. A public proof-of-concept exploit is available via a GitHub issue report, and the vendor has not responded to the coordinated disclosure, leaving deployments unpatched. No public exploit identified as actively exploited in CISA KEV, but the public POC and absence of a vendor patch materially elevate near-term exploitation risk.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - the nanocoai project had not responded to the coordinated disclosure as of the report date. Monitor the NanoClaw GitHub repository (https://github.com/nanocoai/nanoclaw/) and VulDB entry (https://vuldb.com/vuln/386386) for patch releases. As a compensating control, restrict access to the agent-to-agent creation API endpoints (those routed through handleCreateAgent in src/modules/agent-to-agent/create-agent.ts) to only the highest-privilege roles or service accounts, accepting the trade-off that lower-privileged users will lose the ability to create child agents. If network segmentation is feasible, limit the NanoClaw API surface to trusted internal networks or VPN-authenticated clients only, reducing the effective attack population despite PR:L not requiring full admin access. Organizations with high-sensitivity deployments should evaluate temporarily disabling the Child-Agent Creation feature entirely until an official fix is released.

Affected VersionsENISA

NanoClaw 2.0.5
NanoClaw 2.0.31
NanoClaw 2.0.6
NanoClaw 2.0.9
NanoClaw 2.0.42
NanoClaw 2.0.0
NanoClaw 2.0.33
NanoClaw 2.0.64
NanoClaw 2.0.15
NanoClaw 2.0.16
NanoClaw 2.0.48
NanoClaw 2.0.51
NanoClaw 2.0.18
NanoClaw 2.0.45
NanoClaw 2.0.43
NanoClaw 2.0.22
NanoClaw 2.0.35
NanoClaw 2.0.36
NanoClaw 2.0.20
NanoClaw 2.0.1
NanoClaw 2.0.14
NanoClaw 2.0.47
NanoClaw 2.0.29
NanoClaw 2.0.10
NanoClaw 2.0.38
NanoClaw 2.0.17
NanoClaw 2.0.52
NanoClaw 2.0.23
NanoClaw 2.0.34
NanoClaw 2.0.4
NanoClaw 2.0.57
NanoClaw 2.0.32
NanoClaw 2.0.12
NanoClaw 2.0.40
NanoClaw 2.0.41
NanoClaw 2.0.24
NanoClaw 2.0.27
NanoClaw 2.0.39
NanoClaw 2.0.26
NanoClaw 2.0.63
NanoClaw 2.0.13
NanoClaw 2.0.59
NanoClaw 2.0.19
NanoClaw 2.0.28
NanoClaw 2.0.30
NanoClaw 2.0.11
NanoClaw 2.0.58
NanoClaw 2.0.56
NanoClaw 2.0.54
NanoClaw 2.0.50
NanoClaw 2.0.3
NanoClaw 2.0.44
NanoClaw 2.0.2
NanoClaw 2.0.46
NanoClaw 2.0.37
NanoClaw 2.0.61
NanoClaw 2.0.21
NanoClaw 2.0.62
NanoClaw 2.0.8
NanoClaw 2.0.25
NanoClaw 2.0.55
NanoClaw 2.0.7
NanoClaw 2.0.49
NanoClaw 2.0.60
NanoClaw 2.0.53

Affected Packages

euvd nanoclaw no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

NanoClaw (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:nanocoai:nanoclaw:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is an AI agent orchestration platform developed by nanocoai that implements agent-to-agent (A2A) workflows. The vulnerability resides specifically in the handleCreateAgent function within src/modules/agent-to-agent/create-agent.ts, the component responsible for spawning child agents. CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) identifies the root cause as a failure to correctly enforce authorization boundaries during child agent instantiation - the function likely does not validate whether the calling user or agent is permitted to grant specific permission levels to newly created child agents, enabling privilege inheritance or direct privilege assignment beyond what the caller is entitled to. The CVSS 4.0 vector confirms the attack is network-delivered (AV:N), requires low complexity (AC:L), no specific attack prerequisites (AT:N), and only low existing privileges (PR:L).

Know when Nanoclaw gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 2.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 6.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable with low privilege required; scope unchanged and all CIA impacts are partial, consistent with bounded privilege escalation within the platform.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Aug 06, 2026 - 07:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Aug 06, 2026 - 07:22 NVD
5.3 (MEDIUM) 2.1 (LOW)
CVE Published
Aug 06, 2026 - 05:45 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.3

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was detected in nanocoai NanoClaw up to 2.0.64. Affected is the function handleCreateAgent of the file src/modules/agent-to-agent/create-agent.ts of the component Child-Agent Creation. Performing a manipulation results in improper privilege management. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
niche AI agent orchestration platform, limited known enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy